Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
1. Name change service "sooner rather than later" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: We said, guy who in the future will be named "BOOberfly" Wow, you're really close, but I was thinking: BewborFly
- by UberFly - at 2015.03.27 13:31:05
|
2. Name change service "sooner rather than later" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I approve of this change. Being able to put a new name on a purchased character would be sweet! No more skipping on a nice toon because it's named "fluffyMcPuddinPop" or something even worse.
- by UberFly - at 2015.03.27 12:24:51
|
3. Take Control of Forum Whining | New Toggle in Tiamat - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The Newface wrote: This is why people like you want to remove attribute implants, skill training and ship cost . Could you provide links for these? I've seen the posts on attribute implants (which I'd happily toss along with remaps), but I'...
- by UberFly - at 2015.02.18 18:49:27
|
4. Take Control of Forum Whining | New Toggle in Tiamat - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Destiny Corrupted wrote: This will always be the case though, for any game ever made. This argument is akin to saying that a game such as EVE shouldn't exist at all, because the logical conclusion is to always cater to the carebear-oriented p...
- by UberFly - at 2015.02.18 18:43:28
|
5. Take Control of Forum Whining | New Toggle in Tiamat - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote: Sadly, all the new vegan paper-pants wearing pansies who drive hybrids are swarming into EvE online, and want it to become WoW or Trammel . What's frightening is no one is pushing back anymore. F We've been ...
- by UberFly - at 2015.02.18 18:19:25
|
6. Unidentified Structures. Still Unidentified, but a lot more Visible.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Milla Goodpussy wrote: yes this is very true.. a carrier pilot just lost his thanatos to 1... haha... ..... check zeeee kill board...... CCP you're gonna refund that right?? right??? I mean he sacrificed his ship to be the 1st one ever to lose ...
- by UberFly - at 2015.02.17 19:17:59
|
7. hi sec Gankers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Anthar Thebess wrote: Carrier rebalance ( aka no capital reps without triage) That has got to be one of the worst ideas I've ever read. Someone slow-cat you out of existence or you just really hate spider-tanking archons? I guess you'd be al...
- by UberFly - at 2015.02.17 17:44:49
|
8. hi sec Gankers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Scipio Artelius wrote: For the knockout punch, go check my killboard. You'll find I'm not a highsec ganker at all. But I certainly agree with them and anyone (like Jenn aside) that think that no play style is above any other and no play style ...
- by UberFly - at 2015.02.17 17:31:55
|
9. Nerfs, and the coming of the second shard - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
And WTF Ezwal?? You close this **** within 3 pages when a PVE bear posts it, yet leave up 20+ pages of gank-bear tears?? (that ought to get this ignorant crap locked)
- by UberFly - at 2015.02.12 23:29:46
|
10. Nerfs, and the coming of the second shard - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: Firs tof all, Meds, take them. Second of all, it's not surprising that you (as always) don't understand what is being said. Where did anyone say anything about the economy? The discussion is about the risk reward scheme, not...
- by UberFly - at 2015.02.12 23:28:05
|
11. Nerfs, and the coming of the second shard - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Scipio Artelius wrote: If the mechanics were changed to encourage all professions to work together and not provide easy solo play , I think those that are being bitched about in this thread would be cheering those changes, just in the way they...
- by UberFly - at 2015.02.12 23:23:55
|
12. Nerfs, and the coming of the second shard - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Scipio Artelius wrote: Who is the CEO of the Corp you are in? NPC or player? Silly argument that you know is flawed and is just posted for argument sake. It doesn't really help the discussion at all. Yes, your argument is silly and flawed, i...
- by UberFly - at 2015.02.12 23:20:55
|
13. Nerfs, and the coming of the second shard - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: That's right, and since i know who you rally are I know it's safe for the rest of us to ignore you lol. You never were capable of accepting a truth that contradicted when you really needed to believe. Further denials and th...
- by UberFly - at 2015.02.12 23:19:08
|
14. Nerfs, and the coming of the second shard - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cancel Align NOW wrote: Uberfly. I know you think you are winning this discussion but your ranting serves as confirmation bias. It couldn't possibly. I have no bias to the content, I'm just really tired of seeing Jenn *****-up every thread wi...
- by UberFly - at 2015.02.12 23:16:37
|
15. Nerfs, and the coming of the second shard - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: I can vouch for Jens numbers in this matter. Then, by all means, break them out. Lets see your figures on burner mission isk & LP and how it figures as a percentage of the Eve economy. Jenn has already pointed out that sh...
- by UberFly - at 2015.02.12 23:15:18
|
16. Nerfs, and the coming of the second shard - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
admiral root wrote: UberFly wrote: You are still... a liar. Jenn, I think this NPC just called you out. 5 cans of Quafe says he doesn't got any proof. Someone remind me again why NPCs are even allowed to post when all they seem to do is...
- by UberFly - at 2015.02.12 23:08:53
|
17. Nerfs, and the coming of the second shard - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: Which means gankers got nerfed, because you need to group up to do what you could have done solo before, where as miners don't have to do anything. Nerfing people who actually create the sense of danger and adventure in EVE ...
- by UberFly - at 2015.02.12 23:06:59
|
18. Nerfs, and the coming of the second shard - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: Nope, not guessing. I live off this. But we've been over the numbers over and over again. look up StoicFaux's fine work with his lvl3 blitzing machariel, that thing makes more isk in high sec than and Ishtar (or another mach) ...
- by UberFly - at 2015.02.12 23:00:04
|
19. Nerfs, and the coming of the second shard - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vic Jefferson wrote: I would spin an alternative hypothesis before accepting one you want to accept a-priori. It could be that there are less or the same number of attacks, but each attack is involving more pilots. You need like, what, 24+ cat...
- by UberFly - at 2015.02.12 22:49:54
|
20. Nerfs, and the coming of the second shard - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: The 2nd toon is docked, it's just for standings, it's a luxury not a necessity. But the rest of that? can't you see that you are rationalizing in order to deny the truth. You're trying (and failing), by bring up rally sensele...
- by UberFly - at 2015.02.12 22:40:43
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |