| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. All Rents tab - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
As long as you are adding new things that we can be charged for can you please put back the ALL RENTS tab that will allow us to have a list of the offices sov etc that we are paying for on a regular basis? You may not think it is useful but it is...
- by Wulfnor - at 2009.11.02 17:06:00
|
2. Current Soverignty Holders - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Wulfnor on 02/11/2009 15:54:50 If that is your view then I suggest you will have to wait and lobby CSM to get CCP to place blank 0.0 regions in Eve placed ASAP :)
- by Wulfnor - at 2009.11.02 15:54:00
|
3. Manufacturing time change needed for t2 processor components - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
It would seem to me that the two changes to the bpo were made for two different reasons. The time was changed to see how that would affect the large requirements and the amount differences were made to lower the need for two mid range metals chrom...
- by Wulfnor - at 2009.11.01 17:47:00
|
4. Current Soverignty Holders - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: HeliosGal the big stuff up in my book was retaining true sec status rather than flattening it and then making it depend on upgrades. Ah well maybe the large alliances have been screaming and ccp is listening to their howls o...
- by Wulfnor - at 2009.11.01 16:37:00
|
5. Sov concerns / questions - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
My hope is that all attacks on FLAGs, STOPs, Hubs and stations will generate alliance mails rather than corp mails but at present it is too early to tell. Making all these mails are at the corporate level would seem to make alliance level defense ...
- by Wulfnor - at 2009.11.01 16:23:00
|
6. Big over looked problem with new Sov System - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Incognito Edited by: CCP Incognito on 21/10/2009 13:09:29 What happens is the upgrades are destroyed when the infrastructure hub is destroyed or un-anchored. And the roles for determining who can unanchor or on...
- by Wulfnor - at 2009.10.21 14:06:00
|
7. Requsting Ban for Osiris Danoup - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Gin G who cairs apart from you I do. You want to change the rules so non consensual pvp is allowed knock yourself out. Until then its not allowed. Ban them and there will be less idiots who will do it.
- by Wulfnor - at 2009.08.15 04:36:00
|
8. CCP: Capital ship fuel bays? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
It would also seem to me that you could create a variant of a ship that could now be specialized for wacky things like salvage ops by placing salvage in their own cargo bay. Just a thought although off topic.
- by Wulfnor - at 2009.07.31 19:15:00
|
9. CCP: Capital ship fuel bays? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I am afraid until you actually increase the size of the carrier fuel bays on test most people will be focus on that. I think they are too low as well. I dont understand the rational for lower CV fuel bays than DN fuel bays. Perhaps if you explaine...
- by Wulfnor - at 2009.07.31 19:08:00
|
10. Tech 3 Ship Production Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Chronotis We are debating adding relatively expensive low sec station reverse engineering and manufacturing assembly lines (where the costs would be higher than equivalent starbase costs) and would like feedback on that ...
- by Wulfnor - at 2009.03.05 02:21:00
|
11. Tech 3 Ship Production Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Just so I am clear: The BPs for the polymer reactions will be seeded on the market with the patch. The BPCs for the components will be found in Hacking sites. The BPCs for the t3 Hulls and subsystems will be reversed engineered by consuming Artif...
- by Wulfnor - at 2009.02.27 01:17:00
|
12. LAB SLots ... a plee to the devs .. please post - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Neither would I Amin but whether the labs are in POS in empire or POS in 0.0 it will not solve the problem of limited lab space. They doubled the amount of lab space since release and all it did was delay haveing the shortage we presently have. ...
- by Wulfnor - at 2004.06.01 13:29:00
|
13. LAB SLots ... a plee to the devs .. please post - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Amin Making more labs wont solve the problem as they'll all be rented up in a day. The main problem is that you make make an alt that can use 4 lab slots with only 2 days training. I dont think CCP agrees with you Am...
- by Wulfnor - at 2004.05.29 14:59:00
|
14. Agent missions feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
One suggestion I would hope CCP would take seriously is putting a confirm on the refusal of a mission. The fact is that windows can come up all over the place and hide the agent window. This is not bad except that clicking on other windows can c...
- by Wulfnor - at 2004.01.03 22:46:00
|
15. Jump In Point fix on Chaos - Jump Changes MUST READ - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I think perhaps trying out your Scorpion setup on Chaos would convince people or perhaps posting the setup here. I am sure there are some who would would try it out and see if it is possible.
- by Wulfnor - at 2003.12.08 19:31:00
|
16. Deep Core Mining ??? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
TL3? The new minerals required for TL2 items can be mined without DCM?
- by Wulfnor - at 2003.12.08 19:11:00
|
17. level 3 agent people need to start over?-skills - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Wulfnor on 08/12/2003 19:05:15 You are correct if the NPC corps that have research agents on TQ are the same ones that have them now on Chaos there will be an advantage to those who have high standings with those corps on TQ now. H...
- by Wulfnor - at 2003.12.08 19:01:00
|
18. Agent missions feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Same mission I outlined above: Before the mission I had 13 RPs. I took the mission and have been unable to complete it. Still 18 minutes before i fail. Now I have 14 RPs. Looks like I earned RPs after takeing the mission but before completei...
- by Wulfnor - at 2003.12.08 14:38:00
|
19. Tech2 BPs and Items - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
So quickly looking over the BPs seems to indicate that in addition to high mineral requirements and high skill levels you will also need tools that will wear out over time. The tools seems to come from specific companies. Addtionally it seems t...
- by Wulfnor - at 2003.12.08 02:28:00
|
20. Tech2 BPs and Items - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Wulfnor on 08/12/2003 02:16:27 I am crushed. I am sitting on 13 RPs in hydromagnetics and my agent is silent:(. I am sure we will need more on TQ.
- by Wulfnor - at 2003.12.08 02:14:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |