Pages: 1 2 [3] |
41. {Issue} Defensive ECM Bursts in High-Sec - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
If the proposal is "AOE weapons versus gates and other NPC structures don't cause a CONCORD response" then yes. ECM affects the outcome of combat so should ALWAYS be considered an offensive act when used against players.
- by mkmin - at 2010.06.07 22:41:00
|
42. Random Security Events - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Interesting in theory but broken. Now, if the sec status was to constantly fluctuate within the high/low/null groupings and on a longer cycle, including moon mins, belt rats, navy response, CONCORD response times, etc, that could be an interesting...
- by mkmin - at 2010.06.07 13:44:00
|
43. jumpgate Invulnerability - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Yeah everyone's talking about the gatecloak, but in a system like Rancer it's probably pretty useless. The gatecloak lasts 30 seconds, and Rancer grids are busy enough with smartbombs running 23/7 that a session change would easily take longer tha...
- by mkmin - at 2010.06.07 13:38:00
|
44. [Discussion] Incentives to PVP - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Tortugan Originally by: Rip Minner There's just no good way to do this. No one is going to stand and fight when there fairly confident there going to get there pods handed to them and there normaly right thats why th...
- by mkmin - at 2010.06.07 02:13:00
|
45. [Proposal] Forum gag to Jedi Picard - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Jedi Picard Edited by: Jedi Picard on 07/06/2010 01:44:48 Originally by: Alain Colcer Originally by: Jedi Picard This is outrageous. Nobody gagged Ankh when she said she wanted to ban highsec wars and she...
- by mkmin - at 2010.06.07 01:52:00
|
46. [Proposal] eBay-like ratings for players to reduce scamming - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
please stop posting ideas here already. Try the features and suggestion forums, see which ideas people like, and then maybe bring them here. You post tons of ideas and every single one of them bad.
- by mkmin - at 2010.06.07 01:40:00
|
47. [Proposal] Forum gag to Jedi Picard - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
sweet jeebus yes. It's a pain to have to avoid certain threads just because of the banal crap that a certain OP posts.
- by mkmin - at 2010.06.07 01:34:00
|
48. [Proposal] Prioritize walking in stations - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Herschel Yamamoto You're the online equivalent of the fat dude dancing with his shirt off at a wedding . Fixed
- by mkmin - at 2010.06.07 00:33:00
|
49. Bombs - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I'm not one to cry "troll", but seriously? Devs have stated that they aren't going to do bombs outside of 0.0 because of what calculating aggro/GCCs would involve. This is definitely in the category of "sounds good on paper until you realize it ...
- by mkmin - at 2010.06.06 21:30:00
|
50. ATTN CCP: Alliance Logos, or lack thereof - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
WTB dev alt so my alliance can have a logo too. Gotta cheat to get anything done in this game.
- by mkmin - at 2010.06.06 21:12:00
|
51. [Issue] The eve-online security - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I vote against, because the more CCP realizes that their cheap crappy facebook ripoff is a piece of **** the better. If a company loses all their customers because they fail to listen to the customers, they deserve the loss. CCP constantly ignores...
- by mkmin - at 2010.06.06 21:05:00
|
52. FOv slider - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Actually there is a FOV slider. CCP screwed us on Dominion and changed our FOV to this teeny tiny wedge so planets would look bigger (at the expense of being able to see what's going on, and causing sea sickness.) ctrl+Rightclick+leftclick-drag l...
- by mkmin - at 2010.06.06 15:57:00
|
53. [Proposal] Pay plex to double training speed. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
on the other hand, a bunch of noobs flying ships they don't know how to fly and can't afford to lose would mean a major buff to LP values and mineral values...
- by mkmin - at 2010.05.31 19:11:00
|
54. Mission Load Balancing Woes - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I'm supporting this, because as it is now it makes the game less fun. Also, I'm not particularly against lvl 5's in highsec. My attempts to get highsec lvl 5's resulted in 6 days of farming an agent and it only turning out a mission that requires ...
- by mkmin - at 2010.05.31 16:40:00
|
55. [Proposal] CCP, commit to excellence. No features left behind. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Dierdra Vaal It is important that old features are excellent before it is too late and we're covered in a huge pile of broken, half finished content. I canceled my account today because of the broken status on everyth...
- by mkmin - at 2010.05.30 21:59:00
|
56. [Proposal] Give us back address book/contact custom folders! - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
They won't do it. It'll go all vaporware on us because CCP cares more about marketing and sales at the expense of reduced functionality. To quote one of the devs in a different thread: Quote: "We're also looking at expanding the label system...
- by mkmin - at 2010.05.28 23:24:00
|
57. Fix the UI once and for all - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Considering CCP completely sucks noodles every time they touch the UI the general "UI revamp" proposal is not supported. Seriously, 1 out of 20 things they do with the UI is actually good, and it's never their own idea. The reason it needs to be r...
- by mkmin - at 2010.05.27 22:27:00
|
58. [Proposal] Give us back address book/contact custom folders! - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: RedSplat Edited by: RedSplat on 26/05/2010 21:28:02 I'm simply astonished someone thought that the removal of custom folders was a good idea. What possible benefit does the removal of custom folders have? Please explai...
- by mkmin - at 2010.05.27 14:36:00
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |