| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 |
181. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: See, I agree with the first bit, but the underlined part is where you lose me. You don't see how mechanically reducing the risks for the mission runners and skewing the aggression mechanics more and more in their favour has h...
- by Tippia - at 2016.01.18 17:12:48
|
182. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Armand Razor wrote: It is called imersion. Or roleplaying. No. It's called being ******* insane. Get some help if you are that incapable of separating real life from a game.
- by Tippia - at 2016.01.18 16:50:55
|
183. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: I disagree. Make up your mind. The PvP part of missions has grown stale and terrible, as you correctly note, and this is in no small part due to the unnecessary added layers of protection that have been applied to the profes...
- by Tippia - at 2016.01.18 16:46:48
|
184. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: But you're only asking for proof because you are assuming the opposite to be generally accepted as true. No. I'm asking for proof because the claim doesn't seem to have any basis in reality. Or, in this case, I'm asking for p...
- by Tippia - at 2016.01.18 15:55:53
|
185. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Effort-post pt.2 We can do more fun stuff. Professionals spend a lot of time in-game; traditionalists do not. Is it really fair that the traditionalists score contribute as much as the professionals do, even though they're not around as much? Wha...
- by Tippia - at 2016.01.18 15:27:51
|
186. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Effort-post pt.1 The first problem with the graph Indahmawar uses is that it's for visual effect rather than precision. So if you'll permit, we'll use this one instead. It's supposed to be the same data, but less GÇ£prettyfiedGÇ...
- by Tippia - at 2016.01.18 15:27:02
|
187. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Of course there is No. Conventional wisdom is anything but. It is just a second-hand assumption. It is exactly why we're asking for proof: because without it, we have nothing, and conventional wisdom doesn't fill the gap. ...
- by Tippia - at 2016.01.18 15:19:39
|
188. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Tippia wrote: Compare and contrast: except it's more like: A: 62% of players are PvE:ers B: Do you have anything to support that? A: Yes! [shows something that even at a very superficial level disproves the claim]. I've in...
- by Tippia - at 2016.01.18 14:16:49
|
189. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: So what % would you consider valid? And what exactly is your problem with Indahmawar? Per the graph as Indahmawar interprets it? 100%. The graph also shows a 100% engagement in combat. And industry. And trading. See, this is...
- by Tippia - at 2016.01.18 13:42:41
|
190. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Ahh Tippia, why don;t you tell me how it does work. Compare and contrast: A: 62% of players are PvE:ers B: Do you have anything to support that? A: Yes! Here it is! -á-á-á-á-á-á-á alternatively A: No, sorry, I'm just guessin...
- by Tippia - at 2016.01.18 13:32:08
|
191. What in the world are they thinking? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Going by a lot of the evidence, they weren't.
- by Tippia - at 2016.01.18 00:19:35
|
192. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Leeluvv wrote: This game is mostly PvE, which is used to fund PvP by some players. So, yes, the game has a higher percentage of PvEing than PvPing. Percentage of what? And where are you getting those numbers? Scipio Artelius wrote: It can'...
- by Tippia - at 2016.01.17 23:27:37
|
193. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Poddington Bare wrote: Lan Wang wrote: well 62% pve - 100% pvp :) Confirming: Nobody has done both. Ever. Pretty much. That's only the beginning of why Indahmawar's number is cringeworthy in its level of wilful ignorance.
- by Tippia - at 2016.01.17 22:53:28
|
194. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: So prove that 62% aren't PvE'ers. It doesn't work that way. How about you (or he) offer support for your claim that 62% are, since that's what's in question? Quote: From all the stats I've ever seen, PvE is an absolutely ...
- by Tippia - at 2016.01.17 22:02:04
|
195. New ships: hulls you'd like in-game - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ISD Buldath wrote: Bumblefck wrote: ISD Buldath wrote: Polaris frigate needs more chrome. They should basically be removed from the game, which would stop people linking ridiculous fits in local. Well Then what am I going to fly? An...
- by Tippia - at 2016.01.16 19:24:29
|
196. did CCP removed ORE spawns ships in belts? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
There has never been any ORE spawns in the belts. In spite of having their own line of ships and living in null, ORE isn't a pirate faction.
- by Tippia - at 2016.01.16 19:01:57
|
197. i just see this...i couldn't belive it - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mike Adoulin wrote: *makes popcorn* Hey, who remembers Daikatana? *cloaks and warps out* That's unfair. At least Romero had some pedigree and a solid history of good games behind him. The best game Roberts put his name on was one that he ha...
- by Tippia - at 2016.01.16 16:11:52
|
198. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
gnshadowninja wrote: All i know without reading 192 pages is that afew years ago there used to be 70k+ online, now were down to 20 - 30k. That seems rapid enough to me. They've never been above GÇö or even close to GÇö 70k, so no.
- by Tippia - at 2016.01.16 00:40:33
|
199. HICs...whose idea was it - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tyberius Franklin wrote: Tippia wrote: Aiwha wrote: Infinite points are fine no I'm not biased stop asking. I'm definitely also possibly not biased maybe . I mean, proficiency rated as IV means exactly that (never mind that it counts w...
- by Tippia - at 2016.01.16 00:33:48
|
200. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
King Aires wrote: Are you willing to admit that on its face, the graph shows that alts are not being eliminated in mass? No, because it doesn't count alts and it also shows a clear dip in the number of estimated accounts per player. Quote: ...
- by Tippia - at 2016.01.16 00:29:04
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |