| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400 3500 3600 3700 3800 3900 4000 4100 4200 4300 4400 4500 4600 4700 4800 4900 5000 5100 |
30101. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Courthouse wrote: CCP Xhagen wrote: I don't see the engaged population of EVE as a problem. Far from it. What I want to try and achieve is a fair representation of all EVE players. It is however difficult to represent someone that doesn't w...
- by CCP Xhagen - at 2012.09.11 17:19:00
|
30102. Announcement:Mass test on Buckingham on Thursday, September 13th, at 16:30 UTC - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Hi! We will be holding a mass test on Buckingham on Thursday, September 13th, at 16:30 UTC (EVE Time). What exactly is being tested? EVE - DUST integration: Planet districts, planet effects, orbital strike
EVE - DUST integration: chat ...
- by CCP Habakuk - at 2012.09.11 16:50:00
|
30103. Sticky:Dev blog: Singularity, Duality ... Buckingham? - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Goliath wrote: War Kitten wrote: CCP Goliath wrote: Zarnak Wulf wrote: Can we get a hint on the ASB thoughts? I'll ask Superfriends. Any update on this? You side-stepped that part of my previous post :) Or are we waiting for...
- by CCP Goliath - at 2012.09.11 16:42:00
|
30104. Sticky:Dev blog: Singularity, Duality ... Buckingham? - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
War Kitten wrote: CCP Goliath wrote: Zarnak Wulf wrote: Can we get a hint on the ASB thoughts? I'll ask Superfriends. Any update on this? You side-stepped that part of my previous post :) Or are we waiting for the blog to come out?...
- by CCP Paradox - at 2012.09.11 16:42:00
|
30105. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
EvilweaselFinance wrote: CCP Xhagen wrote: Xolve wrote: I still maintain that the problem isn't with the voting system, but with the visibility that the CSM has among the player base. Increase player awareness and even give out little gim...
- by CCP Xhagen - at 2012.09.11 16:38:00
|
30106. Sticky:Dev blog: Singularity, Duality ... Buckingham? - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Tres Farmer wrote: @goliath.. I think you must be the first and only dev I can remember so far that keeps replying for so long and especially often in a thread following a blog. Superb work! - 'Dev of the month' if I were in charge. Cheers...
- by CCP Goliath - at 2012.09.11 16:38:00
|
30107. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
EvilweaselFinance wrote: CCP Xhagen wrote: I've also been thinking about the following scenario: Hold regular elections for CSM8, using current voting mechanics. Make that dictate the results. On the side run an experiment on a new voting s...
- by CCP Xhagen - at 2012.09.11 16:37:00
|
30108. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Courthouse wrote: Xhagen, why are you so afraid of players having to take responsibility for their votes? There's no greater reason to keep the system as it is than with the last election. If people choose to vote for a candidate that gets bann...
- by CCP Xhagen - at 2012.09.11 16:35:00
|
30109. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Sal Volatile wrote: A nice thing about regular polling of some kind leading up to the election is that, in addition to contributing to the drama/excitement and telling the public who's viable and who's not so viable, it is also valuable feedbac...
- by CCP Xhagen - at 2012.09.11 16:27:00
|
30110. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Vile rat wrote: You're a good man CCP Xhagen. I'm doing my best!! *hugz*!!
- by CCP Xhagen - at 2012.09.11 16:26:00
|
30111. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
The Groundskeeper wrote: CCP Xhagen wrote: So, putting Trebors idea aside for the moment, what election system would suit the CSM? Hint: a system which views engaged and motivated groups of voters as a problem is not fair nor is it demo...
- by CCP Xhagen - at 2012.09.11 16:24:00
|
30112. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Blawrf McTaggart wrote: How will you choose from the proffered voting methods, Xhagen & CSM? Will you vote? If so, what voting method will you use to choose from the voting methods in this thread? And how will you decide that method? The...
- by CCP Xhagen - at 2012.09.11 16:18:00
|
30113. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Xolve wrote: I still maintain that the problem isn't with the voting system, but with the visibility that the CSM has among the player base. Increase player awareness and even give out little gimmicky not game breaking rewards for pushing a but...
- by CCP Xhagen - at 2012.09.11 16:17:00
|
30114. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Alekseyev Karrde wrote: Sal Volatile wrote: Now, we could talk about civic virtue, or give people nag screens until they vote, or give them free mining implants for voting, or some other BS like that. We could say that we want to rise abov...
- by CCP Xhagen - at 2012.09.11 16:10:00
|
30115. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Dramaticus wrote: Good to see that someone will actually give us their opinion on the matter, thanks CCP Xhagen. I respect you guys enough to trust you to being able to talk about things in a civilized manner. But if I can ask for a favor, I...
- by CCP Xhagen - at 2012.09.11 16:08:00
|
30116. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Benny Ohu wrote: (Being able to search for CSM forum tags wouldn't hurt) We're having that looked at as apparently you cannot look for GM tags nor ISD tags - so we might just float on that boat when that is fixed.
- by CCP Xhagen - at 2012.09.11 16:01:00
|
30117. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
CliveWarren wrote: - Eve-mails to every character and E-mails to every account annoucing CSM landmark events, i.e. Candidacy period is opened, voting has started, here's the results, CSM summit is happening, CSM minutes are here. That sort of t...
- by CCP Xhagen - at 2012.09.11 16:00:00
|
30118. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Sjonkel Dunk wrote: I think the current system is fine, with a single vote for each account. Any problems with large organized blocks gaming the system or null-sec getting too high representation is easily remedied by increasing the amount of v...
- by CCP Xhagen - at 2012.09.11 15:51:00
|
30119. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
EvilweaselFinance wrote: CCP Xhagen wrote: Yes, we have to come up with a more powerful 'pre-election' mechanic. Me being a reformist rather than a revolutionist I wanted to take the small step first and evaluate the outcome. I believe the ...
- by CCP Xhagen - at 2012.09.11 15:49:00
|
30120. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: As of who you are and your work on the white paper (Still a lovely document) I will not just spew figures at you. Now the current voting system even if left as is has flaws but most of these are external to the system its se...
- by CCP Xhagen - at 2012.09.11 15:44:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400 3500 3600 3700 3800 3900 4000 4100 4200 4300 4400 4500 4600 4700 4800 4900 5000 5100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |
| Click here to find additional results using Google |