Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
vault22dweler
8lack Wing Southern Cross Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.03.02 22:53:00 -
[31]
NO
|
Axel Vindislaga
|
Posted - 2009.03.04 04:07:00 -
[32]
Originally by: Esmenet
Originally by: Treelox no fake pvp allowed, IMO
This.
ITS ALL FAKE WTF! This must be where I have been failing to understand all you "people".. you think its real
OMFG Sacre Bleu!! These Characters you are not "roleplaying" have access to computers millions of time more powerful that your crappy laptop and my awesome rig... don't you think they would USE that?
*installs new GPU and engages in Virtual Battle ground with crappy current technology and has fun*
MY Char would use his awesome high tech stuff for all sorts of awesome fun without turning valuable resources to space dust... Yours wouldn't because yours in a mindless reaver that should get told at a Jump gate that he/she cannot access concord installations any more.
|
Kitsumi
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2009.03.06 10:59:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Esmenet
Originally by: Treelox no fake pvp allowed, IMO
This.
I'm surprised at the resistance to this. I can think of one good use for it. Training. I mean those Neanderthals of Earth, 10,000 years prior to this whole New Eden fiasco were using computer simulations for training.... :P |
Skalet
|
Posted - 2009.03.06 13:01:00 -
[34]
well duh, the idea was pretty ******ed in the first place.
eve is amout risk, once you start to implement carebear death - free arenas you will start eve on the road to its death.
get rid of that idea for good!
|
The ChurchWarden
|
Posted - 2009.03.07 04:04:00 -
[35]
Edited by: The ChurchWarden on 07/03/2009 04:05:24 On a posting spree today it seems. I think the CCP panel got it right during the Q/A at fanfest. This isn't WoW, anyone who equates the possible new TOURNAMENT arena's to that obviously hasn't played EvE. If anything I have faith the dev team would fire anyone who suggested a battleground-isque feature in EvE. With that in mind this could possibly be part of the tool set they were developing to help run the alliance tournament? If that is the case then clearly Alliances could hold mini-tournaments internally or any amount of tournament // grudge matches etc etc could come about. Not to mention we'd be able to bet on the outcome. Now imagine we can bet a ship...
How about the ship we get virtually in the arena. Someone gets to blow up a 'fake' ship and gets I don't know your real Kronos for winning the bet. Sounds like pirates will quickly become highstakes gamblers much like underground racers who put up the title of their cars.
[On a side note what if you need to own the ship 'in eve reality' to use it in the simulation, and subsquently lose it in the bet?]
edit: fixed it to your real kronos
|
CommanderData211
|
Posted - 2009.03.07 11:50:00 -
[36]
I really disagree with implementing some sort of "arena" combat into EVE, but what about a contract system to engage in consensual combat?
There could be all sorts of conditions placed in the contract as to the terms of the battle. Things that come to mind are public/private, number of players involved, meeting point, and items to be wagered.
There could be many more options to select in the contract, but you could set them up with extremely minimal restrictions as well so as to not feel stifled.
Also potentially you could have the choice to rank the fight or not. If you're just messing around then set up the contract for non-ranked or never accept one that is ranked.
Now I realize that this might open a floodgate of suicide gankers, so mitigating that would be difficult, but would it really be that terrible for something like this to occur? I don't really know how this would work out so please no flame but definitely open up some criticism on this one because I think a contract battle system might be interesting.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |