EVE Search - Forced expulsion of 1.0 players

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Forced expulsion of 1.0 players

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page]
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Miilla Hulkageddon Orphanage 252	Posted - 2012.04.25 21:16:00 - [1] - Quote New players in 1.0 "rookie" systems should be forced to leave 1.0 after they have either completed the tutorial or after a set amount of hours/days/weeks/after a month "actively" playing in there. After that condition has been met, nobody except rookies within that condition should be allowed back in. Push them out once they gain experience playing eve "Actively" (so many hours/days/weeks/first month playing online or tutorial and so many hours after).
Josef Djugashvilis 92	Posted - 2012.04.25 21:19:00 - [2] - Quote Unless said player is breaking CCP rules, let them stay where they want for as long as they want. Sandbox. You want fries with that?
Karn Dulake Souls Must Be Trampled The.Alliance 528	Posted - 2012.04.25 21:19:00 - [3] - Quote Translation "Why can't i can bait noobies. Its not fair so i want the game mechanics changed in my favour" I dont normally troll, but when i do i do it on General Discussion.
TWHC Assistant 3	Posted - 2012.04.25 21:19:00 - [4] - Quote If so then why are you still here? By your logic should you have left the forums a long time ago.
Gogela Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance 663	Posted - 2012.04.25 21:21:00 - [5] - Quote Miilla wrote: New players in 1.0 "rookie" systems should be forced to leave 1.0 after they have either completed the tutorial or after a set amount of hours/days/weeks/after a month "actively" playing in there. After that condition has been met, nobody except rookies within that condition should be allowed back in. Push them out once they gain experience playing eve "Actively" (so many hours/days/weeks/first month playing online or tutorial and so many hours after). /signed. ...actually to maintain the "single shard" sandbox experience what if players falling under the above criteria get a 'suspect' flag in rookie systems. We can adjust the sec to 2.0 or something. That might make the transition smooth. Gê¦Gê¦-áEvery Ship in GëíGêçGëí-áGê¦Gê¦ GëíGêçGëí-+ odd items
Miilla Hulkageddon Orphanage 252	Posted - 2012.04.25 21:21:00 - [6] - Quote Karn Dulake wrote: Translation "Why can't i can bait noobies. Its not fair so i want the game mechanics changed in my favour" Not at all, I just want them into my systems for more fun :) Anyway, it will help them by forcing them to explore more of eve sooner than hiding in 1.0. I am never in 1.0 lol.
Asuri Kinnes Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy 356	Posted - 2012.04.25 21:23:00 - [7] - Quote Miilla wrote: New players in 1.0 "rookie" systems should be forced to leave 1.0 after they have either completed the tutorial or after a set amount of hours/days/weeks/after a month "actively" playing in there. After that condition has been met, nobody except rookies within that condition should be allowed back in. Push them out once they gain experience playing eve "Actively" (so many hours/days/weeks/first month playing online or tutorial and so many hours after). I know this is a troll, but, wth, I'm bored. Because not everyone picks up the game at the same speed? Some people are out in 0.0 w/in a couple weeks (hours even, depending on their background/personality) - others never get that far. Why set an arbitrary number to an indefinable circumstance? Wormholes: The NEW end game of Eve - Online: No Local. No Lag. No Blues (No Intell Channesl). No Blobs. NEW FEATURE: NO INCARNA!
Miilla Hulkageddon Orphanage 252	Posted - 2012.04.25 21:24:00 - [8] - Quote Asuri Kinnes wrote: Miilla wrote: New players in 1.0 "rookie" systems should be forced to leave 1.0 after they have either completed the tutorial or after a set amount of hours/days/weeks/after a month "actively" playing in there. After that condition has been met, nobody except rookies within that condition should be allowed back in. Push them out once they gain experience playing eve "Actively" (so many hours/days/weeks/first month playing online or tutorial and so many hours after). I know this is a troll, but, wth, I'm bored. Because not everyone picks up the game at the same speed? Some people are out in 0.0 w/in a couple weeks (hours even, depending on their background/personality) - others never get that far. Why set an arbitrary number to an indefinable circumstance? That is why I said "actively" playing the game and "tutorial completed". Learn by doing... make them do it.
Ai Shun 741	Posted - 2012.04.25 21:25:00 - [9] - Quote Josef Djugashvilis wrote: Unless said player is breaking CCP rules, let them stay where they want for as long as they want. Sandbox. +1 Don't dictate how others should play. EVE Ambulation and Avatars as a separate game - see here
Roll Sizzle Beef Space Mutiny 274	Posted - 2012.04.25 21:26:00 - [10] - Quote And how will the tutorial make them jump systems in the intro missions unless there was a group of rookie systems separate from universe. And That would be a lonely place for rookies with only other rookies who don't know anything. Then you have alts making new characters to cause trouble anyway so they still have to ban people anyway for messing with rookies. Too much trouble for no gain. Sandbox does not need a one way slide to enter into it.
Miilla Hulkageddon Orphanage 252	Posted - 2012.04.25 21:26:00 - [11] - Quote Ai Shun wrote: Josef Djugashvilis wrote: Unless said player is breaking CCP rules, let them stay where they want for as long as they want. Sandbox. +1 Don't dictate how others should play. CCP already dictate how we should play.
Ai Shun 741	Posted - 2012.04.25 21:29:00 - [12] - Quote Miilla wrote: Ai Shun wrote: Josef Djugashvilis wrote: Unless said player is breaking CCP rules, let them stay where they want for as long as they want. Sandbox. +1 Don't dictate how others should play. CCP already dictate how we should play. Tell you what; add a PvP flag for Carebears. Then I'll agree with your idea because the two are essentially the same concept - heavy handed interference in a player's playing. EVE Ambulation and Avatars as a separate game - see here
Miilla Hulkageddon Orphanage 252	Posted - 2012.04.25 21:31:00 - [13] - Quote Ai Shun wrote: Miilla wrote: Ai Shun wrote: Josef Djugashvilis wrote: Unless said player is breaking CCP rules, let them stay where they want for as long as they want. Sandbox. +1 Don't dictate how others should play. CCP already dictate how we should play. Tell you what; add a PvP flag for Carebears. Then I'll agree with your idea because the two are essentially the same concept - heavy handed interference in a player's playing. CCP already are heavy handed in players playing. Eve isn't really the sandbox you think it is. That is just a buzzword thrown around for marketing.
Alavaria Fera GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 465	Posted - 2012.04.25 21:34:00 - [14] - Quote Ai Shun wrote: Miilla wrote: CCP already dictate how we should play. Tell you what; add a PvP flag for Carebears. Then I'll agree with your idea because the two are essentially the same concept - heavy handed interference in a player's playing. They would love that. But I guess we'd have to remove wardecs as well? Since otherwise someone might wardec you and blow you up... Take all the tech Build all the titans Drop all the POSes Bees incoming, nerf ERRYTHING ERRYDAY
hakkiew365 Aideron Robotics Darkmatter Initiative 1	Posted - 2012.04.25 21:36:00 - [15] - Quote Why on earth are you making all these pointless threads with not so subtle whines and means of fueling your epeen needs. Just stop.
Miilla Hulkageddon Orphanage 252	Posted - 2012.04.25 21:36:00 - [16] - Quote Alavaria Fera wrote: Ai Shun wrote: Miilla wrote: CCP already dictate how we should play. Tell you what; add a PvP flag for Carebears. Then I'll agree with your idea because the two are essentially the same concept - heavy handed interference in a player's playing. They would love that. But I guess we'd have to remove wardecs as well? Since otherwise someone might wardec you and blow you up... Wardecs in highsec have effectively been made "useless" anyway.
Ai Shun 741	Posted - 2012.04.25 21:37:00 - [17] - Quote Alavaria Fera wrote: Ai Shun wrote: Miilla wrote: CCP already dictate how we should play. Tell you what; add a PvP flag for Carebears. Then I'll agree with your idea because the two are essentially the same concept - heavy handed interference in a player's playing. They would love that. But I guess we'd have to remove wardecs as well? Since otherwise someone might wardec you and blow you up... Yeah, except it is a fundamentally ******** thing to do. Same as kicking players out of a system just because. EVE Ambulation and Avatars as a separate game - see here
Roll Sizzle Beef Space Mutiny 274	Posted - 2012.04.25 21:37:00 - [18] - Quote Miilla wrote: CCP already are heavy handed in players playing. Eve isn't really the sandbox you think it is. That is just a buzzword thrown around for marketing. Miilla wrote: CCP already dictate how we should play. Other than don't bait rookies who don't stand a chance against your game knowledge in these 1.0 systems. Its a really simple small tiny rule that does not need a group of systems separate from the universe. If you don't have the self control to keep yourself from baiting some Ibis in a 1.0 system and the rookie actually knows how to petition you, you deserve whatever you get. If a "rookie" is 1 hour old and in jita to trade out plex. kill them. why? because they are not in the 1.0 rookie system. Wow this stuff is hard.
Ai Shun 741	Posted - 2012.04.25 21:37:00 - [19] - Quote Miilla wrote: CCP already are heavy handed in players playing. Eve isn't really the sandbox you think it is. That is just a buzzword thrown around for marketing. If they are - I disagree - you want to make it worse. Congratulations. EVE Ambulation and Avatars as a separate game - see here
Miilla Hulkageddon Orphanage 252	Posted - 2012.04.25 21:38:00 - [20] - Quote Roll Sizzle Beef wrote: Miilla wrote: CCP already are heavy handed in players playing. Eve isn't really the sandbox you think it is. That is just a buzzword thrown around for marketing. Miilla wrote: CCP already dictate how we should play. Other than don't bait rookies who don't stand a chance against your game knowledge in these 1.0 systems. Its a really simple small tiny rule that does not need a group of systems separate from the universe. If you don't have the self control to keep yourself from baiting some Ibis in a 1.0 system and the rookie actually knows how to petition you, you deserve whatever you get. If a "rookie" is 1 hour old and in jita to trade out plex. kill them. why? because they are not in the 1.0 rookie system. Wow this stuff is hard. Again i will repeat, it isn't to go in and kill them, it is to get them further out into the eve universe sooner.
Montevius Williams Eclipse Industrial Inc Order of the Void 285	Posted - 2012.04.25 21:39:00 - [21] - Quote Miilla wrote: New players in 1.0 "rookie" systems should be forced to leave 1.0 after they have either completed the tutorial or after a set amount of hours/days/weeks/after a month "actively" playing in there. After that condition has been met, nobody except rookies within that condition should be allowed back in. Push them out once they gain experience playing eve "Actively" (so many hours/days/weeks/first month playing online or tutorial and so many hours after). -10/10 Sandbox Better idea: Give rookies a tag while in rookie systems. If they have that tag, dont do anything stupid or you get banned. If they dont have the tag, they are free game. "The American Government indoctrination system known as public education has been relentlessly churning out socialists for over 20 years". - TravisWB
Roll Sizzle Beef Space Mutiny 275	Posted - 2012.04.25 21:46:00 - [22] - Quote Miilla wrote: it is to get them further out into the eve universe sooner. There are no mission agents, there is a epic arch to send them kipping around empire. there are easy tickets into FW (which might mean something in inferno, but still, out of 1.0). People in rookie systems who like to take rookies into their corps to show them the game (majority suck, but still, user generated content of EvE). If people don't get how to leave the rookie system onto even the slightest upward scale such as onto lvl1 agents. Perhaps that's natural selection.
Sigurd Sig Hansen Hedion University Amarr Empire 34	Posted - 2012.04.25 21:50:00 - [23] - Quote Miilla wrote: New players in 1.0 "rookie" systems should be forced to leave 1.0 after they have either completed the tutorial or after a set amount of hours/days/weeks/after a month "actively" playing in there. After that condition has been met, nobody except rookies within that condition should be allowed back in. Push them out once they gain experience playing eve "Actively" (so many hours/days/weeks/first month playing online or tutorial and so many hours after). beating on players that barely know their asses from a hole in an asteroid.... like this game doesnt have a legendalrily high learning curve as it is. Wanting to beat on those players (bannable as it currently is, I SEVERELY doubt that'll ever change - nice troll tho) is yet another of those "why are we seen as sociopaths in space?" answers Montevius Williams wrote: Miilla wrote: New players in 1.0 "rookie" systems should be forced to leave 1.0 after they have either completed the tutorial or after a set amount of hours/days/weeks/after a month "actively" playing in there. After that condition has been met, nobody except rookies within that condition should be allowed back in. Push them out once they gain experience playing eve "Actively" (so many hours/days/weeks/first month playing online or tutorial and so many hours after). -10/10 Sandbox Better idea: Give rookies a tag while in rookie systems. If they have that tag, dont do anything stupid or you get banned. If they dont have the tag, they are free game. They already have that its called "being in those systems" See GM Homonia's clarification in the "clarification" thread. Mining is the "Deadliest Catch" in this game
Vyl Vit Cambio Enterprises 419	Posted - 2012.04.25 21:53:00 - [24] - Quote We'll kiss your butt on this as soon as you start adding IN your contracts the ships you're selling. Deal? Anyone with any sense has already left town.
Hamshoe School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State 13	Posted - 2012.04.25 22:03:00 - [25] - Quote Miilla wrote: Karn Dulake wrote: Translation "Why can't i can bait noobies. Its not fair so i want the game mechanics changed in my favour" Not at all, I just want them into my systems for more fun :) It's clear you're using a unique meaning of the phrase "Not at all...". Perhaps you could substitute "Precisely!" or "That's exactly what I meant,..." for clarity?
Sid Hudgens 32	Posted - 2012.04.25 23:42:00 - [26] - Quote Terrible pvpers in hisec "carebear" systems should be forced to leave hisec after they have either completed a gank or after a set amount of hours/days/weeks/after a month "actively" playing in there. After that condition has been met, nobody except real pvpers within that condition should be allowed back in. Push them out once they gain experience playing eve "Actively" (so many hours/days/weeks/first month playing online or tutorial and so many hours after). "....as if 10,058 Goon voices cried out and were suddenly silenced."
Sentinel Smith Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 54	Posted - 2012.04.25 23:46:00 - [27] - Quote Most "Rookie" systems are not even 1.0.. fyi. They range from 1.0 to 0.8.
Aggressive Nutmeg 203	Posted - 2012.04.25 23:57:00 - [28] - Quote Miilla wrote: New players in 1.0 "rookie" systems should be forced to leave 1.0 after they have either completed the tutorial or after a set amount of hours/days/weeks/after a month "actively" playing in there. After that condition has been met, nobody except rookies within that condition should be allowed back in. Push them out once they gain experience playing eve "Actively" (so many hours/days/weeks/first month playing online or tutorial and so many hours after). Strongly disagree. New players learn quickest by making mistakes. Getting ganked or can-flipped or whatever should be seen as part of your learning process. I remember 2 years ago, when I first started playing Eve, I deliberately took the bait of a can-flipper (knowing exactly what would happen) just to see exactly how the game mechanic worked. I've since done the same with a number of game mechanics for the sake of my personal learning. It's just pixels. It's just a game. Never make eye contact with someone while eating a banana.
Sigurd Sig Hansen Hedion University Amarr Empire 34	Posted - 2012.04.26 00:17:00 - [29] - Quote Aggressive Nutmeg wrote: Miilla wrote: New players in 1.0 "rookie" systems should be forced to leave 1.0 after they have either completed the tutorial or after a set amount of hours/days/weeks/after a month "actively" playing in there. After that condition has been met, nobody except rookies within that condition should be allowed back in. Push them out once they gain experience playing eve "Actively" (so many hours/days/weeks/first month playing online or tutorial and so many hours after). Strongly disagree. New players learn quickest by making mistakes. Getting ganked or can-flipped or whatever should be seen as part of your learning process. I remember 2 years ago, when I first started playing Eve, I deliberately took the bait of a can-flipper (knowing exactly what would happen) just to see exactly how the game mechanic worked. I've since done the same with a number of game mechanics for the sake of my personal learning. It's just pixels. It's just a game. no psycho/sociopathic personalities in this thread at all Mining is the "Deadliest Catch" in this game
Pok Nibin Viziam Amarr Empire 125	Posted - 2012.04.26 00:34:00 - [30] - Quote Posting in the How Stupid Can You Get? thread. Some people should be paid not to think. BINGO! Miilla's new money for nothing scam! Don't fight it.-á Rejoin your Amarrian patriarchs.-á You know you want to.
Just Alter Enlightened Industries Test Alliance Please Ignore 35	Posted - 2012.04.26 00:45:00 - [31] - Quote hakkiew365 wrote: Why on earth are you making all these pointless threads with not so subtle whines and means of fueling your epeen needs. Just stop. tl;dr for every single one of his thread: just stop poasting. Also: stop trying to ruin the sandbox.
Asuri Kinnes Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy 361	Posted - 2012.04.26 00:56:00 - [32] - Quote Miilla wrote: Asuri Kinnes wrote: Miilla wrote: New players in 1.0 "rookie" systems should be forced to leave 1.0 after they have either completed the tutorial or after a set amount of hours/days/weeks/after a month "actively" playing in there. After that condition has been met, nobody except rookies within that condition should be allowed back in. Push them out once they gain experience playing eve "Actively" (so many hours/days/weeks/first month playing online or tutorial and so many hours after). I know this is a troll, but, wth, I'm bored. Because not everyone picks up the game at the same speed? Some people are out in 0.0 w/in a couple weeks (hours even, depending on their background/personality) - others never get that far. Why set an arbitrary number to an indefinable circumstance? That is why I said "actively" playing the game and "tutorial completed". You learn better and faster by doing... make them do it. I can't believe your anywhere near serious.... Wormholes: The NEW end game of Eve - Online: No Local. No Lag. No Blues (No Intell Channesl). No Blobs. NEW FEATURE: NO INCARNA!
ELECTR0FREAK 4	Posted - 2012.04.26 01:00:00 - [33] - Quote Miilla wrote: New players in 1.0 "rookie" systems should be forced to leave 1.0 after they have either completed the tutorial or after a set amount of hours/days/weeks/after a month "actively" playing in there. After that condition has been met, nobody except rookies within that condition should be allowed back in. Push them out once they gain experience playing eve "Actively" (so many hours/days/weeks/first month playing online or tutorial and so many hours after). Hai. I have an idea!!!1one People who have lived in nullsec should be forced to move to high sec after a specific amount of time. Same with people that live in low sec, they should be forced to move to null sec. Sound good? No? You don't want to told where you have to live? Oh, well then lets just scratch the whole thing.
Alavaria Fera GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 472	Posted - 2012.04.26 01:15:00 - [34] - Quote ELECTR0FREAK wrote: People who have lived in nullsec should be forced to move to high sec after a specific amount of time. Same with people that live in low sec, they should be forced to move to null sec. Sound good? No? You don't want to told where you have to live? Oh, well then lets just scratch the whole thing. No possibility to joke about highsec incursions anymore. Ah crap. Well, lets just say, uh ... hm. I don't know ... oh right. We didn't want that sov that CCP just liquidated, after all. If you just want CCP to destry the concept of nullsec sov holding, just say so rather than try to sneakily talk about forcing the sov holders away from their sov. Take all the tech Build all the titans Drop all the POSes Bees incoming, nerf ERRYTHING ERRYDAY
ELECTR0FREAK 5	Posted - 2012.04.26 01:30:00 - [35] - Quote Alavaria Fera wrote: ELECTR0FREAK wrote: People who have lived in nullsec should be forced to move to high sec after a specific amount of time. Same with people that live in low sec, they should be forced to move to null sec. Sound good? No? You don't want to told where you have to live? Oh, well then lets just scratch the whole thing. No possibility to joke about highsec incursions anymore. Ah crap. Well, lets just say, uh ... hm. I don't know ... oh right. We didn't want that sov that CCP just liquidated, after all. If you just want CCP to destry the concept of nullsec sov holding, just say so rather than try to sneakily talk about forcing the sov holders away from their sov. What in hell are you talking about? I was being a sarcastic jerk towards the OP, my post had absolutely nothing to do with sov.
Alavaria Fera GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 472	Posted - 2012.04.26 01:32:00 - [36] - Quote ELECTR0FREAK wrote: Alavaria Fera wrote: ELECTR0FREAK wrote: People who have lived in nullsec should be forced to move to high sec after a specific amount of time. Same with people that live in low sec, they should be forced to move to null sec. Sound good? No? You don't want to told where you have to live? Oh, well then lets just scratch the whole thing. No possibility to joke about highsec incursions anymore. Ah crap. Well, lets just say, uh ... hm. I don't know ... oh right. We didn't want that sov that CCP just liquidated, after all. If you just want CCP to destry the concept of nullsec sov holding, just say so rather than try to sneakily talk about forcing the sov holders away from their sov. What in hell are you talking about? I was being a sarcastic jerk towards the OP, my post had absolutely nothing to do with sov. Well if we're forced into highsec, obviously no one is defending the sov. Just go with the flow ~ Take all the tech Build all the titans Drop all the POSes Bees incoming, nerf ERRYTHING ERRYDAY
Sigurd Sig Hansen Hedion University Amarr Empire 35	Posted - 2012.04.26 01:40:00 - [37] - Quote Asuri Kinnes wrote: Miilla wrote: Asuri Kinnes wrote: Miilla wrote: New players in 1.0 "rookie" systems should be forced to leave 1.0 after they have either completed the tutorial or after a set amount of hours/days/weeks/after a month "actively" playing in there. After that condition has been met, nobody except rookies within that condition should be allowed back in. Push them out once they gain experience playing eve "Actively" (so many hours/days/weeks/first month playing online or tutorial and so many hours after). I know this is a troll, but, wth, I'm bored. Because not everyone picks up the game at the same speed? Some people are out in 0.0 w/in a couple weeks (hours even, depending on their background/personality) - others never get that far. Why set an arbitrary number to an indefinable circumstance? That is why I said "actively" playing the game and "tutorial completed". You learn better and faster by doing... make them do it. I can't believe your anywhere near serious.... yeah theres a reason millia is on most ppl's ignore thingy caysehe/she/it isnt serious, just seriously deluded or seriously trollin Mining is the "Deadliest Catch" in this game
Kojach Baumherr State War Academy Caldari State 10	Posted - 2012.04.26 03:01:00 - [38] - Quote Miilla wrote: Karn Dulake wrote: Translation "Why can't i can bait noobies. Its not fair so i want the game mechanics changed in my favour" Not at all, I just want them into my systems for more fun :) Anyway, it will help them by forcing them to explore more of eve sooner than hiding in 1.0. I am never in 1.0 lol. WITIDE reading is hard, amirite?
Kestrix UV Heavy Industries 24	Posted - 2012.04.26 03:25:00 - [39] - Quote Quote: Again i will repeat, it isn't to go in and kill them, it is to get them further out into the eve universe sooner. They will come out when they are good and ready to come out. The thing here is you can't approach this problem without using the force them to do this, force them to do that line! If you want to get them further out into the eve universe sooner, creat a corp like eve uni that helps new players and show them what a wonderful place the eve universe is! You have a reputation Miilla, and the phrase lambs to the slaughter jumps to mind.
Simetraz State War Academy Caldari State 228	Posted - 2012.04.26 03:41:00 - [40] - Quote Miilla Why ? What purpose does this serve ?
Masamune Dekoro School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State 83	Posted - 2012.04.26 04:04:00 - [41] - Quote Miilla wrote: New players in 1.0 "rookie" systems should be forced to leave 1.0 after they have either completed the tutorial or after a set amount of hours/days/weeks/after a month "actively" playing in there. After that condition has been met, nobody except rookies within that condition should be allowed back in. Push them out once they gain experience playing eve "Actively" (so many hours/days/weeks/first month playing online or tutorial and so many hours after). You're on a role with these **** threads today.
Bohoba Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State 1	Posted - 2012.04.26 04:10:00 - [42] - Quote Miilla wrote: New players in 1.0 "rookie" systems should be forced to leave 1.0 after they have either completed the tutorial or after a set amount of hours/days/weeks/after a month "actively" playing in there. After that condition has been met, nobody except rookies within that condition should be allowed back in. Push them out once they gain experience playing eve "Actively" (so many hours/days/weeks/first month playing online or tutorial and so many hours after). got a better idea ban hulks and anything over a friget, and afk transport ships cracks me up to see orca and hulks in a 0.1 system that should not be allowed
Kestrix UV Heavy Industries 24	Posted - 2012.04.26 04:36:00 - [43] - Quote Bohoba wrote: Miilla wrote: New players in 1.0 "rookie" systems should be forced to leave 1.0 after they have either completed the tutorial or after a set amount of hours/days/weeks/after a month "actively" playing in there. After that condition has been met, nobody except rookies within that condition should be allowed back in. Push them out once they gain experience playing eve "Actively" (so many hours/days/weeks/first month playing online or tutorial and so many hours after). got a better idea ban hulks and anything over a friget, and afk transport ships cracks me up to see orca and hulks in a 0.1 system that should not be allowed I though that what was all these threads were about? Getting us out of high sec and into your sights?
Jandice Ymladris Perkone Caldari State 13	Posted - 2012.04.26 04:40:00 - [44] - Quote I would agree Miilla if you push the cascade system even further. Spend an amount in rookie systems --> Get booted to normal highsec Spend a certain amount in Highsec --> Get booted to Lowsec Spend a certain amount in Lowsec --> Get booted to NPC Nullsec Spend a certain amount in NPC Nullsec --> Get booted to Pure NUllsec Spend a certain amount in Pure NUllsec --> Get booted to WH space Spend a certain amount in WH Space --> Congratulations! You won the game! This would solve all existing populationproblems and assure players experience every part of Eve! (For those who's sarcasm-o-meter is broken, this post isn't serious, just an extrapolation of what OP desires and shows what a terrible idea it is)
Nephilius Knights of Athena Star Council 365	Posted - 2012.04.26 05:10:00 - [45] - Quote Miilla wrote: Roll Sizzle Beef wrote: Miilla wrote: CCP already are heavy handed in players playing. Eve isn't really the sandbox you think it is. That is just a buzzword thrown around for marketing. Miilla wrote: CCP already dictate how we should play. Other than don't bait rookies who don't stand a chance against your game knowledge in these 1.0 systems. Its a really simple small tiny rule that does not need a group of systems separate from the universe. If you don't have the self control to keep yourself from baiting some Ibis in a 1.0 system and the rookie actually knows how to petition you, you deserve whatever you get. If a "rookie" is 1 hour old and in jita to trade out plex. kill them. why? because they are not in the 1.0 rookie system. Wow this stuff is hard. Again i will repeat, it isn't to go in and kill them, it is to get them further out into the eve universe sooner. Why? I love flying titans in Jita, setting bubbles in Rens,-áor firing off bombs from my stealth bomber-áin Dodixie!-á Just think, if Eve wasn't a sandbox, none of this would be possible!
Shivus Tao Broski North Black Legion. 287	Posted - 2012.04.26 05:58:00 - [46] - Quote I didn't realize people staying in 1.0 systems was a problem. Back when I started eve in 2007 I stayed in 1.0 only until the tutorial sent me elsewhere, and then I went all around down to 0.5 because I understood lolconcord; and why worry about losing a cheap frig to a suicide gank when insurance payed for the whole ship and the T1 fit? Rather than inserting heavy handed rules to solve an invented problem, incentivize lower security space such that there's no reason to return to 1.0 unless you want to grab a skillbook from the nearest school station. Oh wait, the game is already set up that way, until you hit lowsec of course at which point it turns to a wasteland. But lowsec needing fixes has been a topic of many a discussion.
Oraac Ensor School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State 0	Posted - 2012.04.26 06:28:00 - [47] - Quote Miilla wrote: Again i will repeat, it isn't to go in and kill them, it is to get them further out into the eve universe sooner. To kill them there, presumably. Some people just never seem to stop thinking up new ways to kill those who can't fight back. Pathetic.
Ai Shun 764	Posted - 2012.04.26 06:32:00 - [48] - Quote Shivus Tao wrote: I didn't realize people staying in 1.0 systems was a problem. Back when I started eve in 2007 I stayed in 1.0 only until the tutorial sent me elsewhere, and then I went all around down to 0.5 because I understood lolconcord; and why worry about losing a cheap frig to a suicide gank when insurance payed for the whole ship and the T1 fit? Rather than inserting heavy handed rules to solve an invented problem, incentivize lower security space such that there's no reason to return to 1.0 unless you want to grab a skillbook from the nearest school station. Oh wait, the game is already set up that way, until you hit lowsec of course at which point it turns to a wasteland. But lowsec needing fixes has been a topic of many a discussion. Now that is a sensible way to approach the "problem". EVE Ambulation and Avatars as a separate game - see here
Tanya Powers Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 1157	Posted - 2012.04.26 06:35:00 - [49] - Quote TWHC Assistant wrote: If so then why are you still here? By your logic should you have left the forums a long time ago. First this, so Millia once again is either bad trolling or he really believes the crap he's saying. Secondly, what makes you think you have the right to be slacking and grieffing in high sec and noobs shouldn't be in 1.0 as long as they want? Griefer tears best tears, cry me a river.
Scien Inkunen School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State 31	Posted - 2012.04.26 06:40:00 - [50] - Quote If you are bored, quit the game and go harass the kids in your neighborhood. Read the "Fart file" and you will understand the meaning of life !
TWHC Assistant 12	Posted - 2012.04.26 07:01:00 - [51] - Quote Jandice Ymladris wrote: I would agree Miilla if you push the cascade system even further. Spend an amount in rookie systems --> Get booted to normal highsec Spend a certain amount in Highsec --> Get booted to Lowsec Spend a certain amount in Lowsec --> Get booted to NPC Nullsec Spend a certain amount in NPC Nullsec --> Get booted to Pure NUllsec Spend a certain amount in Pure NUllsec --> Get booted to WH space Spend a certain amount in WH Space --> Get booted to Goon space Fixed it.
Nick Bete The Scope Gallente Federation 89	Posted - 2012.04.26 07:10:00 - [52] - Quote This is damned hilarious coming from a notorious troll and scammer who sits and spams all day in Rens and never undocks.
ILikeMarkets Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 108	Posted - 2012.04.26 07:13:00 - [53] - Quote Trying to make the sandbox a little less sandbox with invisible walls and extra rules? Nice. The Mittani discussing, long before the alcohol, what his panel will be about. It is entitled "Goonswarm Hates You".-á Enjoy! Be sure to go re-read his "Apology" after listening to compare his claims. :) http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=SKC00a0ovTA#t=413s
Ciar Meara Virtus Vindice 635	Posted - 2012.04.26 09:06:00 - [54] - Quote TWHC Assistant wrote: If so then why are you still here? By your logic should you have left the forums a long time ago. If only it where so. - [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow]
Seleia O'Sinnor Drop of Honey 210	Posted - 2012.04.26 09:20:00 - [55] - Quote Why is this needed? Eve community: An angry mob of bright people hunting witches, more torches, more hay forks, growing and growing.
Thorn Galen Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact 464	Posted - 2012.04.26 10:05:00 - [56] - Quote Karn Dulake wrote: Translation "Why can't i can bait noobies. Its not fair so i want the game mechanics changed in my favour" Yup, 100% on that. The universe is an ancient desert, a vast wasteland with only occasional habitable planets as oases. We Fremen, comfortable with deserts, shall now venture into another. - STILGAR, From the Sietch to the Stars.
March rabbit Trojan Trolls Red Alliance 166	Posted - 2012.04.26 10:10:00 - [57] - Quote Miilla wrote: ... it is to get them further out into the eve universe sooner. what reason?
Alavaria Fera GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 472	Posted - 2012.04.26 10:22:00 - [58] - Quote The only amusing thing I rememberseeing in the rookie 1.0 systems was a couple of hulks eating all the veldspar there a few months ago, expecting to be left alone. I don't even think they were jetcanning (might have been non-manual miners, that just docked and dropped off the veldspar, who knows). I just hope they leave/left some for the newbies that are learning the game. Maybe they're not there anymore. Take all the tech Build all the titans Drop all the POSes Bees incoming, nerf ERRYTHING ERRYDAY
Rekon X School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State 13	Posted - 2012.04.26 11:56:00 - [59] - Quote OP gets my vote for stupidest player award. I don't care what you think, if you ever think at all.
Dark Drifter Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance 30	Posted - 2012.04.26 12:45:00 - [60] - Quote there are only 12 1.0 systems in this great gamescape that we call eve that are subject to the non interfearance rule set forward by CCP. the rest are all good for the ganking!!! anyhoo if you want to gank your noob friend then just wait till the tutorial agent sends him/*her to the career advancement agenst 2 systems away... they are 0.9 and not subject to this rule. again free for the ganking
Lfod Shi Lfod's Ratting and Salvage 14	Posted - 2012.04.26 13:03:00 - [61] - Quote Hope the newborn learn to make ammo fast... and don't get booted from the system before the job is done. Kiddies gotta eat! GÖ¬ They'll always be bloodclaws to me GÖ½
Ticarus Hellbrandt Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 12	Posted - 2012.04.26 13:12:00 - [62] - Quote stupid idea, i often pop into kisogo to buy skill books
Sable Moran Moran Light Industries 37	Posted - 2012.04.26 13:18:00 - [63] - Quote Miilla wrote: New players in 1.0 "rookie" systems should be forced to leave 1.0 after they have either completed the tutorial or after a set amount of hours/days/weeks/after a month "actively" playing in there. After that condition has been met, nobody except rookies within that condition should be allowed back in. Push them out once they gain experience playing eve "Actively" (so many hours/days/weeks/first month playing online or tutorial and so many hours after). Some of those noobie systems are right smack in the middle of busy traveling routes. So, another stillborn idea from Miilla. When will they stop? Sable's Ammo Shop at Alentene V - Moon 4 - Duvolle Laboratories Factory. Hybrid charges, Projectile ammo, Missiles, Drones, Ships, Need'em? We have'em, at affordable prices. Pop in at our Ammo Shop in sunny Alentene.
Lucas Schuyler Mortis Noir. Ineluctable. 13	Posted - 2012.04.26 13:21:00 - [64] - Quote Miilla wrote: New players in 1.0 "rookie" systems should be forced to leave 1.0 after they have either completed the tutorial or after a set amount of hours/days/weeks/after a month "actively" playing in there. After that condition has been met, nobody except rookies within that condition should be allowed back in. Push them out once they gain experience playing eve "Actively" (so many hours/days/weeks/first month playing online or tutorial and so many hours after). Really? Of all the issues in Eve, the fact that you have to wait a little while to gank new players is a concern worthy of a forum post?
Barakach R-ISK Shadow Operations. 57	Posted - 2012.04.26 13:36:00 - [65] - Quote Miilla wrote: Ai Shun wrote: Miilla wrote: Ai Shun wrote: Josef Djugashvilis wrote: Unless said player is breaking CCP rules, let them stay where they want for as long as they want. Sandbox. +1 Don't dictate how others should play. CCP already dictate how we should play. Tell you what; add a PvP flag for Carebears. Then I'll agree with your idea because the two are essentially the same concept - heavy handed interference in a player's playing. CCP already are heavy handed in players playing. Eve isn't really the sandbox you think it is. That is just a buzzword thrown around for marketing. The rules CCP makes are more like the laws of physics. You can't have a game with absolutely no rules at all. How would one decide if you took damage or avoided damage?... rules. CCP tries to make semi-fair rules. High sec has high sec rules, low sec has low sec rules, null sec has null sec rules. Go to which ever sec fits the kind of rules you want.
Kairos Antilles The Scope Gallente Federation 25	Posted - 2012.04.26 13:43:00 - [66] - Quote Miilla wrote: ...make them do it. Emphasis mine... You honestly can't see how that is antithetical to a 'sandbox'?

CCP Phantom C C P C C P Alliance 1243	Posted - 2012.04.27 23:00:00 - [67] - Quote Not relevant to EVE General Discussion. Thread locked. CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator


Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.