| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Firebyrd
   |
Posted - 2004.08.12 13:48:00 -
[31]
bring it back, bad move to remove it, make it grantible, or just for player controlled corps
-----------------------------------------------
In the End , there can be only 1
Today we celebrate, for tomorrow we die
learn from yesterday, that u may be stronger tomorrow
May the force be with us all |
Firebyrd
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 13:48:00 -
[32]
bring it back, bad move to remove it, make it grantible, or just for player controlled corps
-----------------------------------------------
In the End , there can be only 1
Today we celebrate, for tomorrow we die
learn from yesterday, that u may be stronger tomorrow
May the force be with us all |
CT BadIronTree
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 13:56:00 -
[33]
 Originally by: Rod Blaine
CT Badirontree wants it restored
i am a director so i dont have problems mouhahahha
me the only spamer now :P
============================================
Colossus Technologies
The first and oldest corp in eve!
BadIronTree Head of Production
CSM Chat Log September 25, 2003:
Fuhry> Some things we simply cannot test, and therefore we just put it on Tranq. cross our fingers and then get into panic mode.
---------------------------------------
playing (or beta testing)since Sat, 2 Nov 2002 16:06 (beta 5)
---------------------------------------
|
CT BadIronTree
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 13:56:00 -
[34]
Originally by: Rod Blaine
CT Badirontree wants it restored
i am a director so i dont have problems mouhahahha
me the only spamer now :P
============================================
Colossus Technologies
The first and oldest corp in eve!
BadIronTree Head of Production
CSM Chat Log September 25, 2003:
Fuhry> Some things we simply cannot test, and therefore we just put it on Tranq. cross our fingers and then get into panic mode.
---------------------------------------
playing (or beta testing)since Sat, 2 Nov 2002 16:06 (beta 5)
---------------------------------------
|
DeathGrip
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 13:59:00 -
[35]
I would like to see it come back. I have a few corp members that run corp events, like lottery's and so forth, I don't want to give them access to everything, but now they have no way of emailing the entire corp to let us know who won, who purchased what tickets adn so forth. 
[i]Everyone needs to bring PVP to the table, Miners, Builders, Researchers, Get yourself a Frig, and help out some, You may even |
DeathGrip
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 13:59:00 -
[36]
I would like to see it come back. I have a few corp members that run corp events, like lottery's and so forth, I don't want to give them access to everything, but now they have no way of emailing the entire corp to let us know who won, who purchased what tickets adn so forth.
[i]Everyone needs to bring PVP to the table, Miners, Builders, Researchers, Get yourself a Frig, and help out some, You may even |
Dingo78
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 14:14:00 -
[37]
I would really like to get corp mails back..
(cause I can be a bit slow at forwarding mails. )
The idea of making it a grantable role is great.
Dingo78 - CEO and Founder of the IMAGINOS corporation |
Dingo78
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 14:14:00 -
[38]
I would really like to get corp mails back..
(cause I can be a bit slow at forwarding mails.)
The idea of making it a grantable role is great.
Dingo78 - CEO and Founder of the IMAGINOS corporation |
pshepherd
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 15:05:00 -
[39]
give back corp mails :D
|
pshepherd
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 15:05:00 -
[40]
give back corp mails :D
|
Lysender
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 15:16:00 -
[41]
I don't want it back. I'm glad it's gone. I would log online to 15 spam eve-mails. Now I log online to four important eve-mails. This was a good idea. 
|
Lysender
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 15:16:00 -
[42]
I don't want it back. I'm glad it's gone. I would log online to 15 spam eve-mails. Now I log online to four important eve-mails. This was a good idea.
|
Omniwar
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 15:52:00 -
[43]
Now here is what I see in this thread.
Almost everyone wants the feature back, some want it back as a grantable feature VIA corp menu like hanger access, so will we see it back or will it be ignored.
And coming back in a patch after say 2 months isnt really a solution because then people will have adapted and the change will be unneeded more or less.
Some fixes should happen via hotfix asap if they are intented to come in my opinion and as is clearly seen then the vast majority of people with opinions of the matter are against the change, will we be listened to by CCP? Only they know.
Spawn of the Devil
|
Omniwar
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 15:52:00 -
[44]
Now here is what I see in this thread.
Almost everyone wants the feature back, some want it back as a grantable feature VIA corp menu like hanger access, so will we see it back or will it be ignored.
And coming back in a patch after say 2 months isnt really a solution because then people will have adapted and the change will be unneeded more or less.
Some fixes should happen via hotfix asap if they are intented to come in my opinion and as is clearly seen then the vast majority of people with opinions of the matter are against the change, will we be listened to by CCP? Only they know.
Spawn of the Devil
|
Lomithrandra
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 17:35:00 -
[45]
I would like it back too for player controlled corporations only.
Therefore "spamming" from recruiters would not be an issue.
_____________________________
Lomithrandra
Lead Forum Moderator
[ Forum Rules ] |
Lomithrandra
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 17:35:00 -
[46]
I would like it back too for player controlled corporations only.
Therefore "spamming" from recruiters would not be an issue.
_____________________________
Lomithrandra
Lead Forum Moderator
[ Forum Rules ] |
Mr nStuff
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 18:48:00 -
[47]
Originally by: Lysender
I don't want it back. I'm glad it's gone. I would log online to 15 spam eve-mails. Now I log online to four important eve-mails. This was a good idea.
Maybe you need to ch-check your corp members and tell them to stop spamming.
Or maybe there should be a way for the CEO to determine whether or not corpmsg is allowed. Or like a security level, like All members are allowed, or you can specify which members are allowed..
áDunno though. it was probably just accidently removed.  Originally by: Lomithrandra
I would like it back too for player controlled corporations only.
Therefore "spamming" from recruiters would not be an issue.
Hmmm.. Well it should of never worked for NPC corporations. It's silly to remove it from player owned corporations to fix NPC corporation recruit spamming to.
5 R&D Agents, 10months, Zero BPO Offers..
Onboard navigational [Planetary Avoidance] computer.
My account will be suspended at the end of the current play period.
Expires on 19. September 2004 |
Mr nStuff
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 18:48:00 -
[48]
Originally by: Lysender
I don't want it back. I'm glad it's gone. I would log online to 15 spam eve-mails. Now I log online to four important eve-mails. This was a good idea.
Maybe you need to ch-check your corp members and tell them to stop spamming.
Or maybe there should be a way for the CEO to determine whether or not corpmsg is allowed. Or like a security level, like All members are allowed, or you can specify which members are allowed..
áDunno though. it was probably just accidently removed. Originally by: Lomithrandra
I would like it back too for player controlled corporations only.
Therefore "spamming" from recruiters would not be an issue.
Hmmm.. Well it should of never worked for NPC corporations. It's silly to remove it from player owned corporations to fix NPC corporation recruit spamming to.
5 R&D Agents, 10months, Zero BPO Offers..
Onboard navigational [Planetary Avoidance] computer.
My account will be suspended at the end of the current play period.
Expires on 19. September 2004 |
Odet
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 18:57:00 -
[49]
better yet pp, compramise...
have ccp implement it as an option directors and ceos can enable. akla corp tab, click:allow non directors to send corp mails
click: to not
simple... easy... do it.
=This podding has been brought to you by Odet, the only way to fry.= |
Odet
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 18:57:00 -
[50]
better yet pp, compramise...
have ccp implement it as an option directors and ceos can enable. akla corp tab, click:allow non directors to send corp mails
click: to not
simple... easy... do it.
=This podding has been brought to you by Odet, the only way to fry.= |
Dao 2
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 19:02:00 -
[51]
im not even in a corp and i want it back... just cause it sounds right :D
|
Dao 2
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 19:02:00 -
[52]
im not even in a corp and i want it back... just cause it sounds right :D
|
Lansfear
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 19:06:00 -
[53]
Does anyone have any idea why it was changed in the first place? I have no memory of anyone ever complaining about it.
|
Lansfear
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 19:06:00 -
[54]
Does anyone have any idea why it was changed in the first place? I have no memory of anyone ever complaining about it.
|
Odet
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 19:22:00 -
[55]
Bringing it back wont be fair to all. So stop complaining about bringing it back and start complaining for an option that ur ceo and directors can click to allow their members to send corp mails or not. In a huge corp u dont want spam going to everyone. And in a smal corp u want good cmmunication.
aka
Omniwar, moo would get their good communication.
And huge corps like merchant marines and stuff wouldnt have to deal with the uber spammage.
compramise dont nerf.
=This podding has been brought to you by Odet, the only way to fry.= |
Odet
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 19:22:00 -
[56]
Bringing it back wont be fair to all. So stop complaining about bringing it back and start complaining for an option that ur ceo and directors can click to allow their members to send corp mails or not. In a huge corp u dont want spam going to everyone. And in a smal corp u want good cmmunication.
aka
Omniwar, moo would get their good communication.
And huge corps like merchant marines and stuff wouldnt have to deal with the uber spammage.
compramise dont nerf.
=This podding has been brought to you by Odet, the only way to fry.= |
Dafuzz
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 22:03:00 -
[57]
Originally by: Lansfear
Does anyone have any idea why it was changed in the first place? I have no memory of anyone ever complaining about it.
I recall something regarding overhead and lag issues being talked about.
My corp rarely uses this function. But with a loosely run corp as m0o stated it was in a prior post, I could see the benefits.
Characters in n00b corps can't access a corp hangar, so perhaps make this feature allowable to anyone with any roles or hangar access within any corporation.
Please bring it back.
--
-If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, riddle them with bullets.. |
Dafuzz
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 22:03:00 -
[58]
Originally by: Lansfear
Does anyone have any idea why it was changed in the first place? I have no memory of anyone ever complaining about it.
I recall something regarding overhead and lag issues being talked about.
My corp rarely uses this function. But with a loosely run corp as m0o stated it was in a prior post, I could see the benefits.
Characters in n00b corps can't access a corp hangar, so perhaps make this feature allowable to anyone with any roles or hangar access within any corporation.
Please bring it back.
--
-If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, riddle them with bullets.. |
Shamrock
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 23:56:00 -
[59]
Originally by: Lomithrandra
I would like it back too for player controlled corporations only.
Therefore "spamming" from recruiters would not be an issue.
yea, what she said.
Shamrock
|
Shamrock
|
Posted - 2004.08.12 23:56:00 -
[60]
Originally by: Lomithrandra
I would like it back too for player controlled corporations only.
Therefore "spamming" from recruiters would not be an issue.
yea, what she said.
Shamrock
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |