| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
255
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 17:17:00 -
[31] - Quote
I can't help but feel a little sympathy here. This is ultimately CCP's fault for doing **** without thinking for about two years solid, now they have to go back through and make all these hard rebalances at once before things get even worse. Inevitably in these situations you're going to get huge swathes of people who get dunked on simply for responding to the incentives CCP created. Overall these are all good changes that need to happen and need to happen now, but I do sympathize a little with the people who get steamrolled in the process. |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
714
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 17:25:00 -
[32] - Quote
So... free isk and outrageous market inflation is a good thing?
Huh. Learn something new everyday.
Myself, I hope they nerf L4 Missions a bit next update, they're a bit out of line too. What's this about Datacore Mining being nerfed?
|

Alexandra Delarge
The Korova
49
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 17:25:00 -
[33] - Quote
Excellent changes made by CCP. Keep up the good work. |

Mark Androcius
51
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 17:26:00 -
[34] - Quote
Tinnin Sylph wrote:As previously pointed out, we have relatively safe space in which to get filthy rich in 0.0 because we fought to own it and continue to fight to keep it secure. I'm fairly sure you don't realise the amount of effort and logistics that go into making such a thing possible because you've never ventured out of the comfort of high sec.
Heh.
I'm gonna give you that point here, I'm sorry community, but i must.
However, the reason a lot of people don't leave the comfort of high sec, is because they don't want to be part of any of the established alliances or corporations and without that, you can't really do anything in null.
The idea of a sandbox, is that you can do your own thing, not to say: well here's 3 large alliances, go join the one you hate the least and have fun.
So once again, credit for what you said there, but try to keep what i just said in mind, cause it's most likely not that far from the truth. If a man speaks his mind in the forest and no woman hears him, is he still wrong? |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
714
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 17:30:00 -
[35] - Quote
Beekeeper Bob wrote:Tinnin Sylph wrote:Ow you hit my in my low risk profit. As opposed to Goon's no risk profit? 
I am confused. What is this no risk profit that you are speaking of? Because I apparently have seriously screwed up my profit making potential if I could be doing something with no risk at all.
I rat in Nullsec, doing Anoms. Forsaken Hubs mostly; Sanctums are good too but as I'm a drone user (Ishtar) I prefer the Forsaken Hub's closer layout. I have to watch local 23x7 while ratting in order to ensure no random ganker shows up; if so I'm pretty much dead, as a ratting ship is not set up for PVP.
The only other source of "no risk profit" that I hear people complaining about is moon goo, which is ********. It's just alliance level mining. Yes, there's an imbalance with tech, yes, they're fixing it, yes, Mittani pushed for them to fix it as one of the CSM. ("Sum1 am do thing that make less iskies!? That umpossible!")
So I remain confused: What no risk profit exactly are you speaking about? |

Mark Androcius
51
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 17:31:00 -
[36] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Vince Snetterton wrote: You null sec nutbars really can't see the forest for the trees. You will wipe out the subscription base
Every expansion that has expanded warfare and combat mechanics and ships has responded in an upswing in new subs (Dominion, Apocrypha, Crucible, etc). Every expansion centered around risk-free hisec isk and commodity faucets (Tyrannis, Incursion, etc) has resulted in a significant drop in EVE's player growth. The most steadfast and loyal EVE players have stuck around because they play to be challenged and overcome genuine, emergent obstacles to their goals - not to tour a theme park with blinking wallets. HTH
+10
Although i must say that, it would kinda suck very hard, seeing as I spent countless hours farming standing and training my science skills, so i could get the best deals on datacores. If they turn out to be worth nothing in a couple of months, i would kinda feel screwed. If a man speaks his mind in the forest and no woman hears him, is he still wrong? |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
714
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 17:34:00 -
[37] - Quote
Mark Androcius wrote:Tinnin Sylph wrote:As previously pointed out, we have relatively safe space in which to get filthy rich in 0.0 because we fought to own it and continue to fight to keep it secure. I'm fairly sure you don't realise the amount of effort and logistics that go into making such a thing possible because you've never ventured out of the comfort of high sec.
Heh. I'm gonna give you that point here, I'm sorry community, but i must. However, the reason a lot of people don't leave the comfort of high sec, is because they don't want to be part of any of the established alliances or corporations and without that, you can't really do anything in null. The idea of a sandbox, is that you can do your own thing, not to say: well here's 3 large alliances, go join the one you hate the least and have fun. So once again, credit for what you said there, but try to keep what i just said in mind, cause it's most likely not that far from the truth.
So petition CCP to add another region or 6 to nullsec. Ta-da, problem solved.
Could do some fun things with that too -- maybe an entire region of nullsec that can only be accessed by Wormholes. Add tech moons to some of the new regions, ta-da, tech moons aren't controlled 100% by the current cartel. Maybe throw in some new factions, like a new pirate faction or even say, splinters of the Empire factions (a sector of nullsec filled with Amarr Missionaries, or Gallente Isolationists, or what have you).
|

Shea Valerien
House of Valerien
12
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 17:35:00 -
[38] - Quote
OP says this like it's a bad thing. There was wayyyy too much money and ISK coming into the game. I'm a hi-sec player right now, being pretty new to the game. I will eventually move to WH space or null-sec, probably in a month or two once I have enough ISK saved up to afford plenty of ships to get destroyed. But I don't like how quickly incursions were flooding ISK into the market. I guess I'm more old school, but I would prefer a game where everybody isn't flying around in shinies and titans. |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
714
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 17:38:00 -
[39] - Quote
Mark Androcius wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Vince Snetterton wrote: You null sec nutbars really can't see the forest for the trees. You will wipe out the subscription base
Every expansion that has expanded warfare and combat mechanics and ships has responded in an upswing in new subs (Dominion, Apocrypha, Crucible, etc). Every expansion centered around risk-free hisec isk and commodity faucets (Tyrannis, Incursion, etc) has resulted in a significant drop in EVE's player growth. The most steadfast and loyal EVE players have stuck around because they play to be challenged and overcome genuine, emergent obstacles to their goals - not to tour a theme park with blinking wallets. HTH +10 Although i must say that, it would kinda suck very hard, seeing as I spent countless hours farming standing and training my science skills, so i could get the best deals on datacores. If they turn out to be worth nothing in a couple of months, i would kinda feel screwed.
I must have missed this thing about Datacores, what all is going on with them? The problem I see with the current system is that people are using it as a passive isk generator (make an alt account, 3x datacore and pi alts, ta-da, pays for that account and your main) instead of it's intended purpose. |

Mark Androcius
51
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 17:43:00 -
[40] - Quote
Xython wrote:I must have missed this thing about Datacores, what all is going on with them? The problem I see with the current system is that people are using it as a passive isk generator (make an alt account, 3x datacore and pi alts, ta-da, pays for that account and your main) instead of it's intended purpose.
Yeah, i don't know where this idea comes from either, but it's all i could make out of the OP. If a man speaks his mind in the forest and no woman hears him, is he still wrong? |

Mark Androcius
52
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 17:45:00 -
[41] - Quote
Xython wrote:Mark Androcius wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Vince Snetterton wrote: You null sec nutbars really can't see the forest for the trees. You will wipe out the subscription base
Every expansion that has expanded warfare and combat mechanics and ships has responded in an upswing in new subs (Dominion, Apocrypha, Crucible, etc). Every expansion centered around risk-free hisec isk and commodity faucets (Tyrannis, Incursion, etc) has resulted in a significant drop in EVE's player growth. The most steadfast and loyal EVE players have stuck around because they play to be challenged and overcome genuine, emergent obstacles to their goals - not to tour a theme park with blinking wallets. HTH +10 Although i must say that, it would kinda suck very hard, seeing as I spent countless hours farming standing and training my science skills, so i could get the best deals on datacores. If they turn out to be worth nothing in a couple of months, i would kinda feel screwed. I must have missed this thing about Datacores, what all is going on with them? The problem I see with the current system is that people are using it as a passive isk generator (make an alt account, 3x datacore and pi alts, ta-da, pays for that account and your main) instead of it's intended purpose.
This is probably the best solution to that specific problem, but sadly, i don't think CCP is willing to do such a thing. If a man speaks his mind in the forest and no woman hears him, is he still wrong? |

Akrasjel Lanate
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
715
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 17:45:00 -
[42] - Quote
Please stop posting with alts   |

Tinnin Sylph
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
136
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 17:46:00 -
[43] - Quote
Mark Androcius wrote: I'm gonna give you that point here, I'm sorry community, but i must.
However, the reason a lot of people don't leave the comfort of high sec, is because they don't want to be part of any of the established alliances or corporations and without that, you can't really do anything in null.
The idea of a sandbox, is that you can do your own thing, not to say: well here's 3 large alliances, go join the one you hate the least and have fun.
So once again, credit for what you said there, but try to keep what i just said in mind, cause it's most likely not that far from the truth.
So your options are stay in High Sec and enjoy the lack of politics/risk and settle for a lower income, or join/found a 0.0 corp and enjoy the higher profits that go along with the increased effort involved for you and your corp mates. Sandbox, yay!
This really is working as intended. Needs more tears. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
655
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 17:50:00 -
[44] - Quote
Xython wrote:So... free isk and outrageous market inflation is a good thing?
Huh. Learn something new everyday.
Myself, I hope they nerf L4 Missions a bit next update, they're a bit out of line too. What's this about Datacore Mining being nerfed?
I'd say that the modules drop nerf is quite of a nerf. In the last years, from 500k-1M mods on BS and some hundreds on BCs etc now the drops got replaced by 1 metal scrap. I don't know if they also implemented the bounties nerf already, but that will be another thing that stacks.
You have to keep something in hi sec that can be done by returning old players to help them get back on track. Else it ends like in other MMOs, where you get back after 2-3 years and are boned because you are so behind it's pointless to catch up. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Vince Snetterton
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
80
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 17:51:00 -
[45] - Quote
Mark Androcius wrote:Xython wrote:I must have missed this thing about Datacores, what all is going on with them? The problem I see with the current system is that people are using it as a passive isk generator (make an alt account, 3x datacore and pi alts, ta-da, pays for that account and your main) instead of it's intended purpose. Yeah, i don't know where this idea comes from either, but it's all i could make out of the OP.
Sigh..what, the CCP major dev's are not on your dear leader's speed-dial? I am not going to help my enemy with information, but It will make you null sec zealots dance with even more glee.
|

Mark Androcius
52
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 17:52:00 -
[46] - Quote
Tinnin Sylph wrote:So your options are stay in High Sec and enjoy the lack of politics/risk and settle for a lower income, or join/found a 0.0 corp and enjoy the higher profits that go along with the increased effort involved for you and your corp mates. Sandbox, yay!
This really is working as intended.
You say found a 0.0 corp, like it's a 5 second job, which it isn't. If a man speaks his mind in the forest and no woman hears him, is he still wrong? |

Tinnin Sylph
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
136
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 17:55:00 -
[47] - Quote
Tinnin Sylph wrote:... join/found a 0.0 corp and enjoy the higher profits that go along with the increased effort involved for you and your corp mates.
That's kind of the point.
But if you want lower effort just join an existing corp. Or, stay in High Sec and accept lower profits. I honestly can't see what part of this could be confusing or considered broken.
Needs more tears. |

Mark Androcius
53
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 17:58:00 -
[48] - Quote
Tinnin Sylph wrote:Tinnin Sylph wrote:... join/found a 0.0 corp and enjoy the higher profits that go along with the increased effort involved for you and your corp mates.
That's kind of the point. But if you want lower effort just join an existing corp. Or, stay in High Sec and accept lower profits. I honestly can't see what part of this could be confusing or considered broken.
Having a life besides EVE, meaning casual play, meaning less then 2 hours per day. Didn't say you were wrong though, only said that there are people who do not WANT to join any of the currently running null sec corporations. If a man speaks his mind in the forest and no woman hears him, is he still wrong? |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
165
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 18:02:00 -
[49] - Quote
Vince Snetterton wrote:I am speaking to the null sec zealots in-game plus the faction within the CCP dev/content community. Well, you got what you wanted. Another massive transfer of wealth from high sec income to null sec.
Best guess after the devastation of the VG's, is we are looking at Incursion ISK injected in the game go from 9 Trillion/month to about 3-4 Trillion, once people have fully figured them out. An immense nerf.
Meantime, the bounties on all Drone missions equals new ISK from the Drone Regions. High sec missions drone bounties will be less far far than the reduction in high sec Incursion Payouts, while the Drone Regions are a substantial new ISK flow.
Let's see what the May numbers look like when CCP does it's tweeets at end of May. Let's see how close I am in my estimates.
I am banking on 3.5 trillion ISK injection from Incursions, and about 28-30 trillion from rest of the game. Total reduction of ISK/month will be in the 1-2 trillion range tops, with a much larger percentage being generated from null.
nope I expect to see 39-44 trillion from bounties alone. the Drone bounties & all the peeps going from Incursions to L4's will more then inject any lost income from Incursions getting gutted. Vanguards in effect got a 50-75% reduction in ISK/hour with OTA's stacking up like dead bodies did in streets of Europe during the Black Plague. Thanks for probably ruining an entire community CCP DEV's... who tests this crap anyways?
To the whiners : CCP Soundwave "Incursions are not a big issue in terms of isk globally" |

Tinnin Sylph
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
136
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 18:04:00 -
[50] - Quote
I'm sure most High Sec residents spend at least as much time playing on average as people in 0.0. What separates them is that those who are risk adverse stay in 'safe' space and accordingly profit less in return for the added safety.
The simple fact is, anyone can move out to 0.0 space if they want to and take advantages of the rewards it offers them... If they're willing at accept the risk. Needs more tears. |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
50
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 18:10:00 -
[51] - Quote
Mark Androcius wrote: Having a life besides EVE, meaning casual play, meaning less then 2 hours per day. Didn't say you were wrong though, only said that there are people who do not WANT to join any of the currently running null sec corporations.
Then those people lose out, simple as that. Their a re plenty of null sec renting corps that expect NOTHING from a member but the isk from the bounties of the rats you kill (or a fixed fee if you are an industiralist). Perfect situation for someone with only a couple hours to play. Heck, there are even NPC null sec allainces that kind of do the same thing if you don't want to leave your stuff in a conquerable station.
But if you jjust have to have the safety of high sec, you should understand that that (like everything) comes at a cost, the cost being lower profits. I think EVE high sec dwellers are some of the most coddled and spoiled people in gaming and that's saying something.
|

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1159
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 18:10:00 -
[52] - Quote
I don't care about so much hate, peace and love people.
CCP plz just make this music mandatory when you jump in to Jita for the next week !! |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1159
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 18:14:00 -
[53] - Quote
Mark Androcius wrote:Having a life besides EVE, meaning casual play, meaning less then 2 hours per day. Didn't say you were wrong though, only said that there are people who do not WANT to join any of the currently running null sec corporations.
Find the good null sec corporation/alliance and instead of looking at your gaming time as a drawback, loo at it as an incredible moment of complicity with awesome people just like you, or with a different life, but al sharing the same passion for this game  |

Vince Snetterton
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
80
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 18:14:00 -
[54] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Vince Snetterton wrote:I am speaking to the null sec zealots in-game plus the faction within the CCP dev/content community. Well, you got what you wanted. Another massive transfer of wealth from high sec income to null sec.
Best guess after the devastation of the VG's, is we are looking at Incursion ISK injected in the game go from 9 Trillion/month to about 3-4 Trillion, once people have fully figured them out. An immense nerf.
Meantime, the bounties on all Drone missions equals new ISK from the Drone Regions. High sec missions drone bounties will be less far far than the reduction in high sec Incursion Payouts, while the Drone Regions are a substantial new ISK flow.
Let's see what the May numbers look like when CCP does it's tweeets at end of May. Let's see how close I am in my estimates.
I am banking on 3.5 trillion ISK injection from Incursions, and about 28-30 trillion from rest of the game. Total reduction of ISK/month will be in the 1-2 trillion range tops, with a much larger percentage being generated from null.
nope I expect to see 39-44 trillion from bounties alone. the Drone bounties & all the peeps going from Incursions to L4's will more then inject any lost income from Incursions getting gutted. Vanguards in effect got a 50-75% reduction in ISK/hour with OTA's stacking up like dead bodies did in streets of Europe during the Black Plague. Thanks for probably ruining an entire community CCP DEV's... who tests this crap anyways?
I should dig up one of my old threads predicting people were not going to touch OTA's because of the enormous risk factor . But CCP listens only to null sec and anti-high sec people.
|

Peck R Wood
State War Academy Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 18:17:00 -
[55] - Quote
Hey, where can a fella find a little action in this universe. Peck Wood needs to party! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6299
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 18:33:00 -
[56] - Quote
Vince Snetterton wrote:Best guess after the devastation of the VG's, is we are looking at Incursion ISK injected in the game go from 9 Trillion/month to about 3-4 Trillion, once people have fully figured them out. Highly unlikely, but good if it turns out to be true.
Quote:I am banking on 3.5 trillion ISK injection from Incursions, and about 28-30 trillion from rest of the game. Very unlikely, but at least the ratios would be moving in the right direction, so the overall picture would be good.
Quote:Total reduction of ISK/month will be in the 1-2 trillion range tops, with a much larger percentage being generated from null. Could have been even better if it was more, but still good.
It hasn't really become any harder to make ISK, but the influx will still be decreased to more sane levels from the various sources. If those rewards get shifted more towards less secure space, then that's a good start at fixing a problem that began to grow 8 years ago. Above all, it allows for more variety in gameplay without being a complete sucker about what you choose to do. So yes, if GÇ£null sec zealotsGÇ¥ are the reason for these changes, then they deserve some cudos. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Enuen Ravenseye
Seniors Clan Get Off My Lawn
32
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 18:38:00 -
[57] - Quote
Vince Snetterton wrote:angry stuff
TL:DR version: Dammit CCP, how can I RMT if you reduce my revenue stream?!?!?
|

Doc Severide
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
63
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 18:49:00 -
[58] - Quote
Tinnin Sylph wrote:I'm sure most High Sec residents spend at least as much time playing on average as people in 0.0. What separates them is that those who are risk adverse stay in 'safe' space and accordingly profit less in return for the added safety.
The simple fact is, anyone can move out to 0.0 space if they want to and take advantages of the rewards it offers them... If they're willing at accept the risk. This makes sense to me. More risk, bigger rewards. What's wrong with that?
I do disagree however as the reasons people won't leave HI-Sec. I fly alone these days, would love to move "back" to 0.0. But I for one thing don't want to go through the hassle of trying to get into a corp. Getting grilled, given the 3rd degree, demanding API, etc, etc. Another thing, I'm tired of the melodrama and assholes who proliferate in some corps. I have been in a corp having lots of fun until some jerk joined up that treats everyone like crap, demanding that everyone flys the ships he thinks we should fly and fit them now he likes. I just wanna meet some guys, fight, have fun, and forget treating the game like it's a matter of life and death... |

Fredfredbug4
Kings of Kill EVE Animal Control
246
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 19:11:00 -
[59] - Quote
CCP wants money making in this game to be about risk vs reward.
The higher the risk, the higher the reward.
Incursions messed that up by creating an extremely low risk and extremely high reward activity, essentially obsoleting every form of money making in the game. |

Vince Snetterton
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
81
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 19:28:00 -
[60] - Quote
Fredfredbug4 wrote:CCP wants money making in this game to be about risk vs reward.
The higher the risk, the higher the reward.
Incursions messed that up by creating an extremely low risk and extremely high reward activity, essentially obsoleting every form of money making in the game.
Either provide numbers or you are a liar. Plain and simple.
Oh, sorry, the numbers do not support you, liar. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |