| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Meridius
   |
Posted - 2004.08.13 06:33:00 -
[1]
Webber/scrambler don't shut off after you destroy the targeted ship, they stay active for there duration, which is around 26seconds.
Anyone else had this happen, ive had it happen on multiple occasions so is this intentional?
And yes its not helpfull for podding one bit.
________________________________________________________
|
Meridius
|
Posted - 2004.08.13 06:33:00 -
[2]
Webber/scrambler don't shut off after you destroy the targeted ship, they stay active for there duration, which is around 26seconds.
Anyone else had this happen, ive had it happen on multiple occasions so is this intentional?
And yes its not helpfull for podding one bit.
________________________________________________________
|
Meridius
|
Posted - 2004.08.13 15:10:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Toastmaster
This is how it should be...
It disables the warp for a ship for 20+ sec and during that time it "recharge" itself so it can be launched again..
Why should it go faster to reactivate a module when target is killed than if you shut it down manually ?
I don't think you understand. It never used to be that way, when a ship was destroyed they would deactivate. I don't remember seeing this in any patchlog so thats why i'm assuming its not intentional.
________________________________________________________
|
Meridius
|
Posted - 2004.08.13 15:10:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Toastmaster
This is how it should be...
It disables the warp for a ship for 20+ sec and during that time it "recharge" itself so it can be launched again..
Why should it go faster to reactivate a module when target is killed than if you shut it down manually ?
I don't think you understand. It never used to be that way, when a ship was destroyed they would deactivate. I don't remember seeing this in any patchlog so thats why i'm assuming its not intentional.
________________________________________________________
|
Meridius
|
Posted - 2004.08.14 23:25:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Blazde
If it was the intention to have a 'recharge time' the relevant skill (Propulsion Jamming) would surely decrease this time, not increase it?
Exactly, toastmaster is just making up things as if he made the game
________________________________________________________
|
Meridius
|
Posted - 2004.08.14 23:25:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Blazde
If it was the intention to have a 'recharge time' the relevant skill (Propulsion Jamming) would surely decrease this time, not increase it?
Exactly, toastmaster is just making up things as if he made the game
________________________________________________________
|
| |
|