Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] [11]:: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Deo Three
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.10 23:15:00 -
[301]
|
Stalax
|
Posted - 2009.03.11 00:27:00 -
[302]
I support this product and/or service.
|
g0th
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.11 02:14:00 -
[303]
signed, supported!
|
Mildeliane
Duragon Pioneer Group GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.11 03:27:00 -
[304]
yep
|
Visakoth
Merch Industrial GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.11 04:49:00 -
[305]
|
Nimathos
Gallente Swarm Of Locusts Shadow of xXDEATHXx
|
Posted - 2009.03.11 07:31:00 -
[306]
If the forum is part of the game, then why is it not a function or application inside the game? besides browsing to it with the internet browser, which makes connection to the world outside eve, thus also unrealistic. Amen. |
Zxxs Trxyzptlk
Merch Industrial GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.11 09:30:00 -
[307]
|
Bronzino
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.11 12:51:00 -
[308]
|
Julius Lincinius
Ex Coelis The Bantam Menace
|
Posted - 2009.03.11 13:58:00 -
[309]
CSM candidates should have some purview over forum moderation. They are supposed to be looking out for the players. Some of us just play forum games... Not allowing them oversight is a bit disheartening that the initial CSM concept has been retooled so much by CCP that it is now only a shadow of its original intent.
|
Abulurd Boniface
Gallente Mercantile Exchange for Mining And Exploration
|
Posted - 2009.03.11 14:21:00 -
[310]
Originally by: ThorTheGreat Why should the forums be treated any different than any other aspect of Eve? What about the forums is so magical that they should be able to operate with immunity? This is stupid.
Discuss.
What you are saying is that the forum will merely end up being an extension of Goonswarm's policies and serve as a political tool to achieve its goals.
I see what you did there. Somebody has been reading the CIA manuals.
We cannot give you that power, although you will seek it by other means.
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
For good to survive it suffices for evil to acquire a deadly, incapacitating disease. |
|
Doxxan
Defcon One Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2009.03.11 21:11:00 -
[311]
|
Yarik Mendel
Amarr Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.03.12 12:35:00 -
[312]
I DON'T TRUST THE FORUM MODS.
Because there is strong evidence certain mods are biased. All we want is accountability for serious moderation, like when someone is banned for something others aren't in the same thread, then you know favoritism exists!
|
Yarik Mendel
Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.03.12 12:36:00 -
[313]
supported
|
Ivoryman
GreenSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.12 13:27:00 -
[314]
No. This opens the forums to be used and abused for player driven agenda's. I for one would not want other 'paying subscribers' dictating what I can/can not do on the forums, which is essentially what you are suggesting.
Ivory
x-AWAR, mostly retired |
Soldis
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.03.12 21:25:00 -
[315]
It seems the few people who are against this issue don't understand it at all. No one is asking for control, just a reason when someone is banned, in the least.
|
Aloriana Jacques
Royal Amarr Institute
|
Posted - 2009.03.13 00:18:00 -
[316]
*signs graciously*
Here on the forums is where the mass majority of the EVE game community participates in discussions about the game, what's going on in game, and various in game actions (buying, selling, trading, asking for help, discussing future changes to the game, etc.) Community is the operative word. If the CSM are meant to represent the community, than they should be able to bring up how CCP can make a better game, as well as improve relations with the community, and that happens on these forums.
- - - Aloriana Jacques - Skill Sheet
|
Ivoryman
GreenSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.13 15:07:00 -
[317]
Quote: It seems the few people who are against this issue don't understand it at all. No one is asking for control, just a reason when someone is banned, in the least.
Please re-read the original post and what it is asking the vote to be about. Also look up the definition of purview.
Getting a stated reason why someone has been banned should be a complete different issue.
Ivory
x-AWAR, mostly retired |
Yarik Mendel
Amarr Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.03.13 15:42:00 -
[318]
Originally by: Ivoryman
Quote: It seems the few people who are against this issue don't understand it at all. No one is asking for control, just a reason when someone is banned, in the least.
Please re-read the original post and what it is asking the vote to be about. Also look up the definition of purview.
In the context of the OP, purview means means oversight, not control.
|
NereSky
Gallente Domination. Force Of Evil
|
Posted - 2009.03.13 15:52:00 -
[319]
Originally by: Yarik Mendel
Originally by: Ivoryman
Quote: It seems the few people who are against this issue don't understand it at all. No one is asking for control, just a reason when someone is banned, in the least.
Please re-read the original post and what it is asking the vote to be about. Also look up the definition of purview.
In the context of the OP, purview means means oversight, not control.
well every organisation govermental or otherwise that has a oversight committee has control
|
fuze
Chosen Path Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2009.03.13 15:59:00 -
[320]
This the goon conga line?
OP has a point but forums isn't exclusively in game or out game. It has eg the out of pod forums as well the corp recruitment forums. The parts that are relevant to the in game real of New Eden automatically are covered by CSM anyway. CSM at least should be able to comment on this privately and publicly without getting moderated. (Besides mods shouldn't be allowed to play Eve to avoid any bias.)
I don't think this will change anything since your avg paranoia will continue to scream bias anyway. CSM oversight still will be very limited even then. |
|
Space Dolemite
|
Posted - 2009.03.14 00:33:00 -
[321]
yo I just be seein dis **** an I'd like to be voicin my suppot aight
one love~
|
Junkie Beverage
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.14 17:11:00 -
[322]
+
|
Jimer Lins
Noir.
|
Posted - 2009.03.16 17:08:00 -
[323]
Forums used to be moderated by players (CRC), answerable to CCP. The player volunteer mods could only moderate, not ban, in response to the CSM's concern back on page 2.
I always thought the decision to eliminate the player moderation team was a poor one that has contributed significantly to the decline in the quality of the forums.
So, supported for some form of oversight by players. Mods need to be answerable in some form to the people who use the forums.
Corp killboard-How to Kill Logoffskis |
Jernau Gurgeh
Gallente University of Caille
|
Posted - 2009.03.16 17:24:00 -
[324]
The CSM should be able to advise on forum policy, but not specific cases There are 10 sorts of people in the world - those who understand binary, and those who do not. |
Lord Matrix
Volition Cult The Volition Cult
|
Posted - 2009.03.16 19:33:00 -
[325]
I support this.
3/4 pure lunatic, 1/4 absolute genius |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] [11]:: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |