Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] [11]:: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Lorkin Desal
Caldari Lone Star Partners
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 12:43:00 -
[301]
o/ Hal
Hope all is going well. If you need any help at all In game, LSP is still around, and I've somehow found myself in charge. Drop By sometime and I can organize a load of stuff for you (detailed Info for you to update etc).
|
Vincta Romajii
|
Posted - 2010.10.25 11:07:00 -
[302]
@ Coleoptere
If he made everyone pay $5 for the guide he could afford to run his site without ads, as it is he provides this amazing resource for free.
I suggest you start by covering his hosting costs and then take it from there.
|
Wolfcheck
Pack o' Wolves
|
Posted - 2010.10.26 12:46:00 -
[303]
Edited by: Wolfcheck on 26/10/2010 12:47:34
Quote: You chose to deal with Google ads. I am telling you, you give bad links for a healthy game. You chose deliberately to entice people to breach the EULA through a third party.
And ashtrays cause cancer.
Quote: If you chose to continue dealing that way and looks like you don't mind, and neither CCP, it shows a complete lack of ethic.... Macro mining is then almost legal!!!!
So the fact there are thefts, and the police doesn't shoot them _before_ they steal, means theft is almost legal? Your logic is flawed.
Quote: Don't tell me about free speech, free will or liberty lol. You chose to make cash whatever EULA can be and any third party you chose to deal with. YOU CHOSE TO HOST GOOGLE ADS WHATEVER THEIR CONTENT IS.
Yah. Facebook hosts isk-seller ads as well, yet CCP has a facebook page. So what do we do? Ban CCP? Ban anyone who uses facebook? Or just get a grip on reality, realize you can't know what ads will be posted on your site, and realize those who want to macro mine will, and those who don't won't?
EDIT: Wrong quoting.
|
Skiff Chandler
|
Posted - 2010.12.21 23:02:00 -
[304]
Quote: Which means that a 22.5% reduction in cycle time translates into a yield increase overtime by 1/(1-0.225)= 1.29 (29%)!
the math is right, but could someone explain to me how he got the equation, and why the bonus is not 22.5% over time, as it takes 22.5% less time shouldn't you get 22.5% more?
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] [11]:: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |