|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Buxaroo
Reikoku
Band of Brothers Reloaded
   |
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:33:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Buxaroo on 23/03/2009 21:34:19
I already made a bet that someone would make a post like this. Thanks for making me 100 mil isk.
And if it wasn't for a POOR game mechanic, you know, disbanding an alliance in a SECOND when you can't even LEAVE a corp in 24 hours, then there wouldn't be a NEED to a renaming.
|
Buxaroo
Reikoku
Band of Brothers Reloaded
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:43:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Hauling Theo
ONe stone to rule em all, but one rule to stone em all.
THIS is messed up.
Yeah, but a flawed GAME MECHANIC that will only have ONE victim, BoB, isn't messed up?
Please explain why it takes 24 hours to leave a corp, takes 24 hours to JOIN an alliance, takes even 10 hours to DESTROY a character....but it takes only a millisecond to insta pop a whole alliance? Please, explain in a legitimate way without bias how this is isn't messed up?
I am all ears.
|
Buxaroo
Reikoku
Band of Brothers Reloaded
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:49:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Caldari Citizen4714
Originally by: rValdez5987
I disagree. If they want their name, let them have it. You still have their space so why complain over a NAME.
It's not the name. It's the blatant favoritism.
TWO of CCP's rules were broken with this act and by themselves.
Violations:- CCP does not do name changes upon player request.
- CCP does not allow naming your player, corporation, or alliance something that parodies an existing player, corporation or alliance. Band of Brothers Reloaded is a painfully obvious parody of Band of Brothers the corporation that existed PRIOR to "Band of Brothers Reloaded". And yes, I'm well aware that this corporation was created by Goonswarm specifically to block the original Band of Brothers members from reclaiming their name. But not one single aspect of this was done using exploits or any other even prohibited means.
There's no explaination for it other than favoritism. The name KenZoku was not a violation of the ToS. Thus it was not eligible for a GM name change.
Quoted for the less intelligent. I can look at all of the THREADS that goons post and can see crap loads of people with all intents and purposes doing what amounts to "parodies an existing player, corporation or alliance". I don't see ANYONE *****ign and moaning like little girls about that. Nah, because they are pro-goon. It's that simple. This amounts to nothing more than a tantrum.
|
Buxaroo
Reikoku
Band of Brothers Reloaded
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 22:13:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Bedrock
Originally by: Tomic
I support this.
quoting dis cause im down
Traitor!
/me gets the pitchforks
|
Buxaroo
Reikoku
Band of Brothers Reloaded
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 22:14:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Von Kleist
Originally by: Buxaroo
Edited by: Buxaroo on 23/03/2009 21:34:19
I already made a bet that someone would make a post like this. Thanks for making me 100 mil isk.
And if it wasn't for a POOR game mechanic, you know, disbanding an alliance in a SECOND when you can't even LEAVE a corp in 24 hours, then there wouldn't be a NEED to a renaming.
Cry more, post less.
Play more and ***** less how about that?
|
Buxaroo
Reikoku
Band of Brothers Reloaded
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 22:19:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Traderjohn
I would request that CSA take up this matter with CCP having a bias view on name changes.
Says the guy who is the only one to get a mothership back by petition. The irony.
|
|
|
| |
|