Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 70 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Lloyd Loar
Merch Industrial GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 04:16:00 -
[781]
|

Xephik
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 04:18:00 -
[782]
Supported
|

Aura Mega
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 04:19:00 -
[783]
http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=423 That commitment was broken yet again. what will next time be bob gets back all of delve which we took by FAIR game mechanics.
|

Boknamar
The Knights Trevor
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 04:23:00 -
[784]
Supported. Not for Goonswarm, but for fairness.
And freedom.
|

Skarned
Diplomatic Disruption Chain of Chaos
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 04:25:00 -
[785]
Edited by: Skarned on 24/03/2009 04:25:17 After the T20 incident I couldn't tell if a just few CCP employees in the middle and the bottom of the company had some massive ******* to try and pull that off, or whether the few at the top had none to oppose it. Maybe it's both. Or maybe... maybe it's the other way around.
|

WhiteTigersGod
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 04:26:00 -
[786]
|

Sherkaner Lumpen
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 04:29:00 -
[787]
This is brazen and shameful GM favoritism.
|

Alexis Strutt
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 04:30:00 -
[788]
|

Grumwald
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 04:32:00 -
[789]
|

Herckon
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 04:33:00 -
[790]
Again:
"Throughout our history, there have been a handful of cases where our employees or members of our various volunteer and partner programs have taken advantage of the proprietary powers they are granted through access and knowledge. These cases have been investigated, prosecuted and judgment rendered. Usually the punishment has been quite simple: termination of employment."
I'd say modifying alliance name outside game mechanics qualify...
|

Triistan
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 04:34:00 -
[791]
|

Sean Naised
Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 04:34:00 -
[792]
|

Unworldly1
Intergalactic Jesters Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 04:37:00 -
[793]
Originally by: Aglaea I'd like Band of Brothers Reloaded to follow the same rules as everyone else.
|

Hesod Adee
Dark-Rising
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 04:39:00 -
[794]
CCP, we demand an explanation.
|

Lorcas
Ars ex Discordia GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 04:40:00 -
[795]
|

Dragorin
Macabre Votum Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 04:44:00 -
[796]
FULLY SUPPORTED!! [url=http://66.11.226.108/killboard/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=47019] [/url] |

Tiberian Berthold
Berthold Enterprises
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 04:45:00 -
[797]
Any sort of official response would be nice, too. Even something as simple as "We're looking into the issue, and will issue a public statement once we know more." |

Hong Jiansen
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 04:46:00 -
[798]
--------
Originally by: Soggybottom Only one thing died tonight and that was honour. To roaring applause...
|

Cowgirl Nuggets
Minmatar Band of Devs Reloaded
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 04:51:00 -
[799]
I see no problem with this name change.
|

Battlecheese
Caldari SiN. Corp Sons of Tangra
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 04:55:00 -
[800]
There's been much discussion of character name limits - I would have thought that the corporation name limits were more relevant in this instance.
http://wiki.eveonline.com/wiki/Naming_Policies
Corporation names Minimum length is 4 characters Maximum length is 50 characters Allowed characters are A-Z, a-z, 0-9, space, minus, dot and single quotation Space, minus, dot and single quotation are not allowed as the first character in a name Space, minus and single quotation are not allowed as the last character in a corporation name Max ticker name is 5
|

Skira Ranos
Blood Money Inc. Blood Money Cartel
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 05:09:00 -
[801]
|

Jetsena
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 05:11:00 -
[802]
I think the most important thing is consistency, which is why I'm supporting this resolution.
I see no honest reason as to why the name was changed, it is not offensive.
The renaming of Kenzoku smacks of favouritism; I believe that not only CCP needs to be impartial, but that they also need to appear impartial.
The renaming makes me believe neither, and I'm very interested as to why it happened.
|

Midjutetur
Blood Covenant Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 05:11:00 -
[803]
|

darius mclever
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 05:12:00 -
[804]
|

earthless
Queens of the Stone Age
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 05:14:00 -
[805]
madprops to ccp for at least being consistent |

Eva Sankarihauta
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 05:19:00 -
[806]
|

Klaw Mydia
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 05:30:00 -
[807]
Edited by: Klaw Mydia on 24/03/2009 05:30:42 I like cheating, thumbs up.
edited for thumbs up
|

Folikar
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 05:30:00 -
[808]
This is wrong, fix it.
|

Cupachabra comgitsum
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 05:33:00 -
[809]
Edited by: Cupachabra comgitsum on 24/03/2009 05:33:45 dubblepoast
|

Cupachabra comgitsum
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 05:33:00 -
[810]
Originally by: Klaw Mydia Edited by: Klaw Mydia on 24/03/2009 05:30:42 I like cheating, thumbs up.
edited for thumbs up
Wow, I would have never expected this kind of behavior from either kenbobku or ccp. At least they're not trying to ignore this is happening like every other time they had anything to do with this game that was a bad idea.
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 70 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |