EVE Search - [Proposal] Disband BOBR

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Assembly Hall

[Proposal] Disband BOBR

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 70 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
moneygrabbingwhore	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:02:00 - [151] CCP " IM NOT LISTENING " lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalanull
killerco Dutch T2 Production	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:03:00 - [152] I support the fact that all should be treated equally. But i like too add that i believe bob was disbanded by an illegal game-mechanic. In my opinion only the alliance leader should be allowed too undo an alliance.
Samuel Grindhoof State War Academy	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:03:00 - [153] i never thought something like that would go over my lips...well...my fingers....whatever...but the goons are just ****ing right. 1 game 1 rule
Julian Shran Amarr Elderan Navy SOLAR WING	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:03:00 - [154] Originally by: kakakakakakkakkakkakkaka Please explain why it takes 24 hours to leave a corp, takes 24 hours to JOIN an alliance, takes even 10 hours to DESTROY a character....but it takes only a millisecond to insta pop a whole alliance? Please, explain in a legitimate way without bias how this is isn't messed up? Hours to Join an alliance.. 24 Hours to Destroy a character .. 10 1 Millisecond to insta-pop a whole alliance... priceless Simple the mechanic you speak of is a 'quit' not a disband. The 'quit' mechanic is so people cannot wardec and avoid wardecs simply by quitting alliances and corps. The Disband option has no such exploit associated so it is instant and the Executor Corp and that CEO is empowered to do anything up to and including disbanding the whole thing. Following is why he was still allowed to do so. BoB was complacent and should have payed attention. Quote from CCP rulebooks: "Declaration of Executor Support All corporations in an Alliance can declare their support for another corporation to fill the executor role. If the present executor does not have the support of more than 50% of the member corporations, he cannot act on behalf of the Alliance. The corporation and its CEO will still be listed as the executor, but all administrative functions will be disabled (this is indicated by an error message that is displayed whenever usage of such a function is attempted by the executor). This means that the Alliance is effectively powerless until such time as the support of the executor is restored or a new executor is declared through gaining more than 50% of the support of the member corporations. The system will attempt to activate an executor once every 24 hours. Only when the established executor regains support or a new one is put in place will access to the administrative functions be restored. As the executor of an Alliance is in a position of power, he must be replaced in cases where he does not possess more than 50% of the support of the member alliances, has stopped playing the game or is otherwise unreachable. Note that changing the CEO of the executor corporation automatically entails that the new CEO is listed as executor. The procedure through which executors are changed is based on the Declaration of Executor Support, which is a simplified form of voting. Every corporation in an Alliance can modify their support for the executor at any time. The default setting is to support the current executor. A declaration of support is only valid if a corporation has been a member of the Alliance for seven consecutive days. The declaration of support is confidential and is only available to the CEO and Directors of the corporation. The Alliance system constantly checks whether an executor has 50% or more of the support of the member corporations. If support drops below 50%, the executor will be informed of this through the display of an error message when attempting to use administrative functions." Yarr!! (and yes I DO like my hat :P... )
Jon Lucien SniggWaffe	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:04:00 - [155]
EYEDOLL Shiva Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:05:00 - [156]
Gneeznow North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:06:00 - [157] give them all the special treatment you want CCP, its not gonna save them and its not gonna make them any less of a hollow husk of an alliance of has-beens v0v
Euriti Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:06:00 - [158] unf unf unf
Hellaciouss Genco Curatores Veritatis Alliance	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:07:00 - [159]
Donatien de'Sade Ars Notoria	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:08:00 - [160] In the beginning the universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move

Iloni Atoriandra Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:10:00 - [161] I shall be writing a very angry letter to IA about this.
Hubris Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:10:00 - [162] molle to alliance - not to fear i will just pick up the bat phone and ccp will help us out wonder if this is t20 strikes back -
Traderjohn Macabre Votum Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:10:00 - [163] Edited by: Traderjohn on 23/03/2009 22:10:34 Support this, They should have lost all sov if they wished to change there Name. EULA even has a section regarding changing name if the name is offensive, The Kenzoku alliance name is not an offensive name if you even check in google. Should CCP decide to keep this they will lose a number of subscriptions due to CCP showing a bias in this decision to allow a change as small as a name to an alliance known for strong connections with CCP, e.g. Moon Exploit - Having 20 control towers setup the same way in 1 system, then the moon exploit came out and the towers came down. T20 - BPO spawns
Fuzuli Perkone	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:11:00 - [164]
Noghri ViR GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:11:00 - [165] --------------------------------------------- Noghri ViR for CSM Vote for me here: http://myeve.eve-online.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=28 http://noghri08.wordpress.com/
Waagaa Ktlehr Evolution Band of Brothers Reloaded	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:11:00 - [166] Edited by: Waagaa Ktlehr on 23/03/2009 22:14:39 Cookies, Cake, Cream and Pie was better anyway. This name sucks :-( Supporting this because the CSM is a farce and can't do crap about this anyway. \o/
Bedrock Reikoku Band of Brothers Reloaded	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:11:00 - [167] Originally by: Tomic I support this. quoting dis cause im down
Tobruk Black Omega Security Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:12:00 - [168] Originally by: Hubris molle to alliance - not to fear i will just pick up the bat phone and ccp will help us out wonder if this is t20 strikes back It would be nice to know the Developer (individual) responsible for this decision ---------------------------------------------- Sig removed. Elmo Pug removed my sig because he hates me
Von Kleist GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:12:00 - [169] Originally by: Buxaroo Edited by: Buxaroo on 23/03/2009 21:34:19 I already made a bet that someone would make a post like this. Thanks for making me 100 mil isk. And if it wasn't for a POOR game mechanic, you know, disbanding an alliance in a SECOND when you can't even LEAVE a corp in 24 hours, then there wouldn't be a NEED to a renaming. Cry more, post less.
Sihirbaz	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:12:00 - [170]

Buxaroo Reikoku Band of Brothers Reloaded	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:13:00 - [171] Originally by: Bedrock Originally by: Tomic I support this. quoting dis cause im down Traitor! /me gets the pitchforks
Dred Tather	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:13:00 - [172]
Cilia Sundara Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:13:00 - [173] I am, for one, raging about this particular matter!
Glaztic	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:14:00 - [174] Gotta agree with Goons: "one game, one rule"
Eskalin Minmatar Evolution Band of Brothers Reloaded	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:14:00 - [175] Originally by: Waagaa Ktlehr Cookies, Cake, Cream and Pie was better anyway. This name sucks :-( this TBQH and evidently with the name change we get 40 titans and a fleet of jove bs's If babies weren't to be eaten they wouldn't be hibachi sized
Buxaroo Reikoku Band of Brothers Reloaded	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:14:00 - [176] Originally by: Von Kleist Originally by: Buxaroo Edited by: Buxaroo on 23/03/2009 21:34:19 I already made a bet that someone would make a post like this. Thanks for making me 100 mil isk. And if it wasn't for a POOR game mechanic, you know, disbanding an alliance in a SECOND when you can't even LEAVE a corp in 24 hours, then there wouldn't be a NEED to a renaming. Cry more, post less. Play more and ***** less how about that?
Italian Wedding Soup Of The Day	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:14:00 - [177] Just wait till April 1st guys, this is obviously an april fools joke. Right? D:
Seth Shadoow Reikoku Band of Brothers Reloaded	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:15:00 - [178] quote dis if your daun!
Traderjohn Caldari Macabre Votum Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:15:00 - [179] I would request that CSA take up this matter with CCP having a bias view on name changes.
Lilya Ormus S.A.S Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.03.23 22:16:00 - [180] band of devs



Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 70 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.