EVE Search - [Proposal] Disband BOBR

All Channels

Assembly Hall

[Proposal] Disband BOBR

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 70 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Leni	Posted - 2009.03.24 15:47:00 - [1351]
Kubera STK Scientific The Initiative.	Posted - 2009.03.24 15:47:00 - [1352]
Caassimolar	Posted - 2009.03.24 15:47:00 - [1353] Originally by: Wideen how about no how about you are a bob pet and don't really have your own opinion so we are just going to ignore you?
paracidic Destructive Influence Band of Brothers Reloaded	Posted - 2009.03.24 15:47:00 - [1354] Originally by: Slaveone In another demonstration of developer misconduct CCP renamed Kenzoku to Band of Brothers Reloaded. This has never been done for an alliance, character, or corporation, ever. Please vote up to disband BOBR. Just ask Haargoth to disband it. *********************************************** Everything ever written by a goon or DS1 member is absolutely factual and should not be challanged in anyway.
Jeager Oberon Incorporated Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2009.03.24 15:47:00 - [1355] 1 game 1 rule
Derek Shmawesome We Know Derek	Posted - 2009.03.24 15:48:00 - [1356] Supported because the "explanation" is even more fail than the renaming itself. :facepalm:
Davthalas North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.03.24 15:49:00 - [1357] **** you ccp
ReD PartiZan Section XIII Tau Ceti Federation	Posted - 2009.03.24 15:49:00 - [1358]
Dr Lovemuscle	Posted - 2009.03.24 15:56:00 - [1359]
Killer128 Gallente Battlestars GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.03.24 15:56:00 - [1360] no matter how this become to be, but it should not happen. Who ever made this has to realize it was a mistake to give preferred treatment to anyone on the game. This is a complete denial of the premise of a living universe where every single action has a consecuence on the way the Universe and on the players.
Stalina Gallente Deep Space Exploration Squad PuPPet MasTers	Posted - 2009.03.24 15:58:00 - [1361] Originally by: Caassimolar Originally by: Wideen how about no how about you are a bob pet and don't really have your own opinion so we are just going to ignore you? Hey, how many alts did you create just to get the votes up on this one? _________________________________
Quintadecimani	Posted - 2009.03.24 15:58:00 - [1362]
Robapin Gallente Section XIII Tau Ceti Federation	Posted - 2009.03.24 15:58:00 - [1363] +1
Tar'an Tula GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.03.24 15:59:00 - [1364] the former members of BoB CHOSE KenZoku as their alliance name. no other alliance has ever been able to change theirs, and thus, CCP allowing KenZoku to get rid of their terrible name for an even more terrible name is unacceptable. this not only continues to prove CCP's favoritism towards this terrible alliance, but sets a bad precedent of changing alliance names. CCP needs to undo this change and make the members of KenZoku either lose their Sov and change the name by making a new allian ce (the way the game is supposed to work) or keep the terrible name the chose for themselves (something every other player in EvE who made a terrible name has to deal with).
Anteia	Posted - 2009.03.24 15:59:00 - [1365]
Jago Kain Ramm's RDI	Posted - 2009.03.24 16:01:00 - [1366] Edited by: Jago Kain on 24/03/2009 16:01:24 meh.... ___________________________________________________ The game will never be over, because we're keeping the meme alive.
Karezan	Posted - 2009.03.24 16:03:00 - [1367] Originally by: Yonker Edited by: Yonker on 24/03/2009 14:20:12 Edited by: Yonker on 24/03/2009 14:19:43 Originally by: Karezan Which is probably the exact reason why the rename was allowed. They had to emergency reform in a (now proven to be pointless) attempt to start regaining sov right away. They did not have adequate time to pick a new name for their alliance, and ended up being allowed a rename because of this (or at least I believe this to be the thought process behind it). I'm guessing the key thing here is that they did lose all sov and pay 1b when BoB was disbanded. They requested this change at the time, and it took 2 months for GM's to decide. They just didn't form under the new name they wanted, because they didn't have time to. Yes it's still an exception to the rules, but they did suffer the downsides (paying another 1b and losing all sov), even if they never planned for it. I'm guessing that's where the 2 month comment comes from, the loss of sov was 2 months ago (at the time of the petition), and the decision was only made now. So you're saying if they waited to re-form their Alliance... the consequence would have been that they would have lost Sov correct? In order to re-form quickly they had to use this already created Alliance with a different name, right? So, they had a choice... either lose Sov, or lose their name. They made a choice to keep sov. So what rule is it that says if you don't like the consequence of your decision... CCP will adjust the game to fit your needs? I'm sure A LOT of scammed people would like to petition CCP under this new rule of "Not having to take responsibility for your actions". You're arguing semantics. I'm sure you're well aware of the fact they lost all their sov 3/4, considering it was a big factor in Goonswarm conquering Delve. Whether they made a new alliance, or used Kenzoku, the sov 1 thing should have happened either way. The requirement for sov 1 is that the towers have been anchored for at least 7 days, not that they have been anchored for 7 days under the current alliance tag, which is exactly why Kenzoku regained sov 1 the DT after the disband. So yes, they did lose their sov, because in this context, when talking about lost sov, it means losing sov 2/3/4, not sov 1, which would come back the first DT after the alliance reform either way.
Yuu Tzar GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.03.24 16:04:00 - [1368]
Dr Aurora	Posted - 2009.03.24 16:04:00 - [1369] oh my goodness.. you guys cry WAYYYY too much... wahh wahh wahh For the slow people out there I do not support this. grow up.
sylverdicate	Posted - 2009.03.24 16:06:00 - [1370] .
Sentry Falloff	Posted - 2009.03.24 16:06:00 - [1371] Edited by: Sentry Falloff on 24/03/2009 16:06:19 .
Dareia Apatis	Posted - 2009.03.24 16:07:00 - [1372] This name change is dodgier than the navy issue Drake I'm trying to sell.
WARPIGG Caldari Battlestars GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.03.24 16:08:00 - [1373] Originally by: Dr Aurora oh my goodness.. you guys cry WAYYYY too much... wahh wahh wahh For the slow people out there I do not support this. grow up. shut up *****!
Stalina Gallente Deep Space Exploration Squad PuPPet MasTers	Posted - 2009.03.24 16:10:00 - [1374] Originally by: WARPIGG Originally by: Dr Aurora oh my goodness.. you guys cry WAYYYY too much... wahh wahh wahh For the slow people out there I do not support this. grow up. shut up ***! Cry more ***! _________________________________
PMolkenthin Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.03.24 16:11:00 - [1375]
Tom Gunn North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.03.24 16:12:00 - [1376] GM's/Dev's have a responsibility to be fair and impartial. They should not be getting involved. If the way Goonswarm took down BoB was legitimate, BoB should not be given 'outside' help, they should have to fight using the tools all players have at their disposal. If they want to rename their alliance, then let them do it via the same options every player has available to them. If Goons cheated or used an illegal exploit to take down BoB, the servers should of been rolled-back, Goons disbanded and their leadership banned permanently as an example of what happens to cheats.
JJbrady312	Posted - 2009.03.24 16:16:00 - [1377]
Mytheos Vengeance Unlimited	Posted - 2009.03.24 16:17:00 - [1378] Originally by: Barstander I don't care about in-game politics, I don't really know any of the players in this. What I do care about is that rules exist and they are consistently enforced. No game, not EvE, not baseball, not football, nor Monopoly, can long survive if the rules are changed to the benefit of one player(s) over another without accountability. Now we get to see if CSM and IA is actually CCP being serious about watching over this game or if it truly was a publicity stunt. This.
WARPIGG Caldari Battlestars GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.03.24 16:18:00 - [1379] Originally by: Stalina Originally by: WARPIGG Originally by: Dr Aurora oh my goodness.. you guys cry WAYYYY too much... wahh wahh wahh For the slow people out there I do not support this. grow up. shut up ***! Cry more *! U shut up too ***
Ash Donai	Posted - 2009.03.24 16:18:00 - [1380] Rename them back to Kenny, then let them disband and recreate if they want another name. I mean WTF, really?!? What happened to internal affairs keeping track of BS like this?

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 70 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.