Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 70 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
NadsMan
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 12:25:00 -
[1981]
|
Lady Karma
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 12:28:00 -
[1982]
Hi Avon, remember saying this?
Originally by: Avon What CCP need to do is clearly define the policy here, and the process involved. They need to reassure the playerbase that name changes will only be made if the name is seen as reasonably likely to cause real offence to the general public.
Originally by: Avon I don't want either everything banned or allowed, that isn't the issue is with selective enforcement. What I want are rules that are enforced fairly and equally. If something is not allowed, then it should be the same for everyone. If something is allowed, then it should be the same for everyone.
How hard is that to understand?
How times change
|
Almighty Malachi
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 12:28:00 -
[1983]
|
Esharan
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 12:34:00 -
[1984]
This is a tough decision for me, because while I think what happened to BOB in the first place was fairly trashy, and unfortunate (certainly not the way I would want to bring down a foe), and I think Meta Gaming is lame true, but this is all part of what makes EVE great and it does seem like their may be some favoritism here.
If CCP could provide some proof that they have taken similar actions before (which I do not believe they have) then perhaps I would be more amicable to the whole name change situation. Furthermore, now that a precedent has been set, they better be ready and willing to change any alliance name.
In addition, if BOBR did get to keep their sov. despite the change that is fairly unconventional too I think, because usually an alliance to change their name would have to reform and lose sov. So BOB most likely should have had to undergo the same process at least, instead of just having a quick painless transfer.
So at the moment, with the given information, I support this cause, BOBR should have to disband, THEN they should reform with their new name and sacrifice standing etc, it just seems more fair that way. I do have sympathy for BOB because of the whole way they went down (very dis-honorable way to win goons imo...) but still it shouldn't get them sympathy from DEVS who should be un-biased and not show any form of favoritism.
Let's see how it shakes out.
|
TheGunslinger42
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 12:35:00 -
[1985]
Originally by: Thercon Jair Oh wait, Band of Developers? That should be GoonSwarm, because, they do have the most members that are GM/Devs.
It's quite hypocritical to call someone to be favoured by the devs when those people whining about it have the biggest number of people working for CCP.
Goonswarm may have the most devs/gms, but they're not the ones getting rules bent to help them win at internet spaceships like BoB. They don't have a history of devs/gms flat out cheating to help their alliance.
|
Shikome Alluin
Genco Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 12:36:00 -
[1986]
Originally by: Talon Scorpio law or justice? We all know that the disbanding of bob was done in a way that begs the question of what was intended by CCP policy with regard to the one button option. That sort of thing was not intended to be used in the way it was. We know that. Further, the letter of the law...is open to interpretation in its application. And none of you are the judges in this case. You are the public.
First Id just like to say that sure, the disbanding by one button is kinda fsckt-up but:
If Molle hadn't removed the shares so alliance changes could go through without a vote then that's his mistake. And how come a absent director still had executor roles intact? Its like removing your firewall because your bandwidth suffers lag, who's fault is it your "secrits" gets stolen? You or the hacker capitalising on the security lapse?
Not anybody's fault but your own you did a stupid thing like this.
And your "letter of the law" point... Its not that the name changed, most couldn't care less. Its that you guys got the rules bent in your favour by CCP YET AGAIN! Countless Alliances have had to disband/lose sov/pay 1bill and reform to get what you got by "pressing 1 button"... (ironic I know :P)
So I guess:
Originally by: George Orwell All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others
- Aloha mr Hand |
Cipher7
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 12:39:00 -
[1987]
66 pages of spam by the 12 people who care and their 6 alts.
This is quite a threadnaught.
See if you can get it 80 pages of wasted disk space by tonight. ---
|
CountingCrow
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 12:43:00 -
[1988]
Originally by: Cipher7
66 pages of spam by the 12 people who care and their 6 alts.
This is quite a threadnaught.
See if you can get it 80 pages of wasted disk space by tonight.
Thanx for helping out ♥
|
Shikome Alluin
Genco Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 12:44:00 -
[1989]
Originally by: Cipher7
66 pages of spam by the 12 people who care and their 6 alts.
This is quite a threadnaught.
See if you can get it 80 pages of wasted disk space by tonight.
You are on page 67, thanks for helping "the cause". And there are allot more then "the swarm" raising their legitimate voice. - Aloha mr Hand |
Shikome Alluin
Genco Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 12:45:00 -
[1990]
Edited by: Shikome Alluin on 25/03/2009 12:45:15 lol double post... that¦s been awhile.
- Aloha mr Hand |
|
Kurt Gergard
HUSARIA Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 12:47:00 -
[1991]
================================================ "No plan has ever survived the contact with the enemy" von Moltke |
Navaj0
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 13:05:00 -
[1992]
You know what, **** it, following 3 accounts (each char on a seperate account) cancelled until this **** is reversed.
thoradh TCup Navaj0
Might be back if this gets reversed...
|
DaemonExodus
Sleeper Industries
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 13:07:00 -
[1993]
Violation of the rules. Needs to be changed back until all other alliances can do this.
|
Brbarlow195
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 13:22:00 -
[1994]
|
Keln Gadik
Royal Amarr Institute
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 13:34:00 -
[1995]
I am a new player. Just plugged in my 60 day code a few days ago. I mainly became interested in looking at EVE due to all the news that was generated because of the Goons taking down BOB. (I guess that is a testament to the saying "there is no such thing as bad press.") I think however questionable the Goons taking out of BOB was, it does not merit any special treatment by the developers. If they used in-game metrics to complete what amounts to a hostile takeover then so be it.
If that in-game metric needs to be changed then the systems put in place to make in-game rule changes should be utilized.
If there is an in game metric for changing your alliance name then it should be used. Anything else would be some form of favoritism. Regardless good luck to all involved. |
Scarlette Harlette
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 13:52:00 -
[1996]
|
Monikerina
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 13:53:00 -
[1997]
Can I change my name please?
|
Lu Zhou
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 13:58:00 -
[1998]
Hey look.
Originally by: Jade Constantine WALL OF TEXT
|
WhiteTigersGod
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 14:05:00 -
[1999]
CCP doesnt realize that with such a small game like this word of mouth is the best advertisement they cant get really.
Now they have over 1300 players calling shenanigans.
Most of these players are willing to stop playing if ccp doesnt listen to overwehlming opinion of the players.
With this massive amount of disappointment ccp will lose allot of business.
I for one will not pay my subscription until this is fixed and I urge all of you to do the same.
|
CaptainDreik
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 14:06:00 -
[2000]
+
|
|
Morte Salutari
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 14:06:00 -
[2001]
Originally by: Cipher7
66 pages of spam by the 12 people who care and their 6 alts.
This is quite a threadnaught.
See if you can get it 80 pages of wasted disk space by tonight.
Hey d ickhead
Of 2000 posts in the thread 1400 are unique votes in agreement with the proposal. We only get to vote once.
It amazes me that you big alliances think you are the only ones in this game. I have no knowledge of, or connection to, any major player. But I pay for the game and I expect there to be no cheating from the developers or CCP.
As has been said, if CCP have repeatedly done such high profile cheats for BoB how many other times have they given them things and not been found out
|
Naomi Knight
Amarr Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 14:07:00 -
[2002]
Yes ,and ban all goon ******s aswell.
|
Lord Captain
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 14:10:00 -
[2003]
+1
|
Seifer Al'Masy
Celestial Horizon Corp.
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 14:10:00 -
[2004]
67 pages, countless posts.... and still no reply from CCP.
a shame, really _____ "Take everything you can, give nothing back." |
Captain Kolchak
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 14:12:00 -
[2005]
Edited by: Captain Kolchak on 25/03/2009 14:13:23 +1
|
Hell Commander
4S Corporation Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 14:15:00 -
[2006]
They killed Kenny!
Save the Kenny!
|
The Blackburd
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 14:19:00 -
[2007]
Hate aligning with Goonies but this **** has to stop CCP.
|
Tlar Sanqua
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 14:31:00 -
[2008]
|
Simokon
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 14:35:00 -
[2009]
|
Jade Constantine
Gallente Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 14:35:00 -
[2010]
Originally by: Shikome Alluin
If Molle hadn't removed the shares so alliance changes could go through without a vote then that's his mistake.
This isn't factual. Shares have nothing to do with the mechanic in play.
ISSUE - Bring Space Bushido to CAOD |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 70 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |