| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Bagdon
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
   |
Posted - 2009.03.24 16:43:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Gone'Postal
Originally by: Montasque
for a topic that is being taken very seriously by most of the player base.
Can you define most? and post stats of your data collection on such wording. I'd like to view your numbers.
The thread in Assembly Hall about this issue has reached 1300+ posts in 20 hours (or less) while the longest thread in that forum, about the POS exploit, reached 1419 posts in two months. It's safe to predict that it will become the longest thread before one day has passed (unless deleted or locked).
Cheating developers is a hot topic.
|
Bagdon
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 19:41:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Twoside
I'm not sure what's more pathetic, X13 alliance having their heads up their masters asscakes or incompetent ccp employees making their whole company look bad... over and over again. Sad :(
For me, the most pathetic part is the stupid attempt to spin this in the OP and CCPs lack of understanding that their customer base is filled with nitpicking nerds and forum warriors who will pick any spin to pieces if it's not 100% factual.
What most likely happened was that some junior GM happened to pick up the petition and made a stupid mistake of not knowing the rules, thought that it looked harmless enough and just did it instead of escalating. Outrage happens and instead of smacking the junior GM in the head, yelling "don't do this again" and then coming to the forums saying "sorry, mistake, we'll try to make it not happen again", they try to spin it with bull**** that took 10 seconds to pick apart.
Here are some responses that would be received much better:
"We were drunk."
"We decided to mess with you for fun."
"Oops"
"The person who did this no longer works for us."
"We're changing the policy, free renames for everyone."
<publish a youtube video of a GM jumping out of the window>
"We lost a bet."
"We arranged a cage fight between a BoB GM and a goon developer, the goon lost."
|
Bagdon
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 18:33:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Vincent Gaines
wrong
by chosing KenZuko, they started at sov 1- not sov 4.
Wrong. Kenzoku already held several systems when ex-BoB decided to join Kenzoku. Including at least one at sov 3.
|
| |
|