EVE Search - Sov mechanism changed. But we don't know about it yet it seems.

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Sov mechanism changed. But we don't know about it yet it seems.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Bloodhands hirr Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2009.04.01 04:47:00 - [1] Edited by: Bloodhands on 01/04/2009 04:49:46 Originally by: Sarah Lopez Having claiming tower majority in a system gets you Sov. Thats what YOU thought. GMs have a different understanding of what is written in the knowledge base and what we all think. The scenario: Alliance A has 9 Towers in a System Alliance B has 12 Towers in a System Alliance A anchores 5 Towers (online, claiming and stronted) before downtime so has 14 Towers before Towers in System, Alliance B stays at 12 Towers. 7 Days and one Downtime later after Alliance A added the 5 Tower, Alliance B still has Sov in that system ( they anchored more in the same system but AFTER downtime ) Here starts the petition: Why does Alliance B still have Sov whether they have only 12 Claiming Towers against the 14 of Alliance A. I didn't believe this statement so I escalated it. The Answer from the Senior GM didn't invalidate the answer of the first GM so this means that not the one that has more Large Towers claiming in system gets Sov but the Alliance that claimed 51% of the ominous "limited amount of sov counting towers" A little bit of thread necro. First off, In my position I work with the sov mechanics quite regularly so please respond fully and completely. 1. Are all towers in question large towers? 2. Were any towers from either party reinforced for any amount of time during the claim in question. 3a. How many large, online and unreinforced towers did alliance A have to contest sovereignty? 3b. Were any of the larges reinforced during the 7 downtime needed to contest sovereignty? 3c. After the 7 down times, what was the total large tower count that had the claim sovereignty box ticked? 4. How many large, online and unreinforced towers did alliance B have before the contesting 7 down times? 4b. Were any of the larges reinforced during the 7 downtime needed to contest sovereignty? 4c. After the 7 down times, what was the total large tower count? 5. Are you positive that the option to claim sovereignty was ticked on every tower from alliance A the entire time? Its not an automatically ticked option upon online. Also, your GM was smoking crack, didn't understand the question fully or you did not understand the answer completely. Please mail me in-game the translated and unabridged / untranslated logs since it is a violation of the Eve-Online guidelines to post GM chat logs or petition responses on an open forum. (nav was being nice, he could have temp banned you) Bloodhands Director, hirr Morsus Mihi

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.