EVE Search - My views on Tpar

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

My views on Tpar

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Jiggy	Posted - 2004.08.19 23:43:00 - [1] FA would be badly stretched to hold querious, period basis and delve. My advice for the moment would be not to bother defending the stations and lose ships doing so since you gain nothing from doing so.If FA make it beneficial for you to defend the stations then defend them but if they dont I wouldnt bother.
Jiggy	Posted - 2004.08.19 23:43:00 - [2] FA would be badly stretched to hold querious, period basis and delve. My advice for the moment would be not to bother defending the stations and lose ships doing so since you gain nothing from doing so.If FA make it beneficial for you to defend the stations then defend them but if they dont I wouldnt bother.
Jiggy	Posted - 2004.08.19 23:51:00 - [3] If refine rates and docking charges will go up under FA rule wouldnt it be better if the stations were under CA control?
Jiggy	Posted - 2004.08.19 23:51:00 - [4] If refine rates and docking charges will go up under FA rule wouldnt it be better if the stations were under CA control?
Jiggy	Posted - 2004.08.20 00:03:00 - [5] Well the way I see it from a neutral point of view is that if DSMA/CFS are losing ships to CA defending the stations for FA wouldnt they be as well off losing ships defending the stations from FA and holding the stations for themselves.
Jiggy	Posted - 2004.08.20 00:03:00 - [6] Well the way I see it from a neutral point of view is that if DSMA/CFS are losing ships to CA defending the stations for FA wouldnt they be as well off losing ships defending the stations from FA and holding the stations for themselves.
Jiggy	Posted - 2004.08.20 00:45:00 - [7] Well tbh if all the small alliances operating within CFS space merged together with CFS to make a new alliance they would have some strength and would be able to hold down atleast part of CFS space and ward off pretty much any intrders.
Jiggy	Posted - 2004.08.20 00:45:00 - [8] Well tbh if all the small alliances operating within CFS space merged together with CFS to make a new alliance they would have some strength and would be able to hold down atleast part of CFS space and ward off pretty much any intrders.
Jiggy	Posted - 2004.08.20 02:02:00 - [9] Originally by: Johnny Cochran and in the end it dosnt matter how big DSMA is as it still isnt their space, no more then it is FAs Space belongs to whoever can hold onto it, laying a claim means jack **** if you cant keep people you dont want out of it.If DSMA or any of the other alliances can claim and hold a system or constellation in what is regarded CFS space then it is then their space until somebody takes it off of them.
Jiggy	Posted - 2004.08.20 02:02:00 - [10] Originally by: Johnny Cochran and in the end it dosnt matter how big DSMA is as it still isnt their space, no more then it is FAs Space belongs to whoever can hold onto it, laying a claim means jack **** if you cant keep people you dont want out of it.If DSMA or any of the other alliances can claim and hold a system or constellation in what is regarded CFS space then it is then their space until somebody takes it off of them.

Jiggy	Posted - 2004.08.20 02:13:00 - [11] CFS are the main group that should be consolidating now, making stronger alliances with the smaller alliances operating within their space and generally getting a more organised structure within their space, not having tiffs with those alliances like the one they had with DSMA a few months back that nearly led to war between the two.
Jiggy	Posted - 2004.08.20 02:13:00 - [12] CFS are the main group that should be consolidating now, making stronger alliances with the smaller alliances operating within their space and generally getting a more organised structure within their space, not having tiffs with those alliances like the one they had with DSMA a few months back that nearly led to war between the two.
Jiggy	Posted - 2004.08.20 02:50:00 - [13] Originally by: Jae Nefarious iam getting scared now its starting to look like CA is the good guys CA basically want to deprive FA of resources or in best case sencario get a war going between CFS and co versus FA, while them helping CFS and co is generally a good thing in most peoples view its not for CFS' benefit that they are doing so.
Jiggy	Posted - 2004.08.20 02:50:00 - [14] Originally by: Jae Nefarious iam getting scared now its starting to look like CA is the good guys CA basically want to deprive FA of resources or in best case sencario get a war going between CFS and co versus FA, while them helping CFS and co is generally a good thing in most peoples view its not for CFS' benefit that they are doing so.
Jiggy	Posted - 2004.08.20 03:04:00 - [15] Edited by: Jiggy on 20/08/2004 03:05:40 Im not saying its not, what Im saying is that CA arent offering to help for CFS for the benefit of CFS but for their own, but in this case odds are it would benefit both of them.
Jiggy	Posted - 2004.08.20 03:04:00 - [16] Edited by: Jiggy on 20/08/2004 03:05:40 Im not saying its not, what Im saying is that CA arent offering to help for CFS for the benefit of CFS but for their own, but in this case odds are it would benefit both of them.
Jiggy	Posted - 2004.08.20 13:37:00 - [17] Originally by: DeGrand Quote: o no u better hide an fa stating thier opinions on the forums will get u kicked Hehe..I seriously doubt that. I was asked to leave my corp for posting my opinions on the forums and I know of others who have been kicked or asked to leave also.
Jiggy	Posted - 2004.08.20 13:37:00 - [18] Originally by: DeGrand Quote: o no u better hide an fa stating thier opinions on the forums will get u kicked Hehe..I seriously doubt that. I was asked to leave my corp for posting my opinions on the forums and I know of others who have been kicked or asked to leave also.
Jiggy	Posted - 2004.08.20 16:09:00 - [19] Originally by: Rattman For the reference we have no refining tax and no docking fees so we are making no isk of these stations and they will most likely cost us more to defend these stations than we will ever make out of it Rattman For the 2 Omega corp posts above me.
Jiggy	Posted - 2004.08.20 16:09:00 - [20] Originally by: Rattman For the reference we have no refining tax and no docking fees so we are making no isk of these stations and they will most likely cost us more to defend these stations than we will ever make out of it Rattman For the 2 Omega corp posts above me.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.