EVE Search - My views on Tpar

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

My views on Tpar

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Rattman	Posted - 2004.08.20 11:07:00 - [1] Edited by: Rattman on 20/08/2004 12:11:08 Edited by: Rattman on 20/08/2004 11:09:26 This is completely unofficial and my own opinion Originally by: AvanCade On topic: FA should get the ** out ! And Setana should not own the station as well. We have seen them as many times as we have seen FA. And now we almost have FA out, and then SA comes claiming stuff. Setenta** do not own the stations, we moved in and controlled them with agreement of the involved parties. We would not have done this without the permission of all the involved parties We consider many of the corps involved to be freinds and dont wish to see them start shooting each other. Hopefully an agreement can be found between all parties and the stations can be returned to someone else control. Because no one wants to have a chaotic space on thier border For the reference we have no refining tax and no docking fees so we are making no isk of these stations and they will most likely cost us more to defend these stations than we will ever make out of it Rattman All opinions, rambling or not, expressed here are my own and not that of my corp or alliance
Rattman	Posted - 2004.08.20 11:07:00 - [2] Edited by: Rattman on 20/08/2004 12:11:08 Edited by: Rattman on 20/08/2004 11:09:26 This is completely unofficial and my own opinion Originally by: AvanCade On topic: FA should get the ** out ! And Setana should not own the station as well. We have seen them as many times as we have seen FA. And now we almost have FA out, and then SA comes claiming stuff. Setenta** do not own the stations, we moved in and controlled them with agreement of the involved parties. We would not have done this without the permission of all the involved parties We consider many of the corps involved to be freinds and dont wish to see them start shooting each other. Hopefully an agreement can be found between all parties and the stations can be returned to someone else control. Because no one wants to have a chaotic space on thier border For the reference we have no refining tax and no docking fees so we are making no isk of these stations and they will most likely cost us more to defend these stations than we will ever make out of it Rattman All opinions, rambling or not, expressed here are my own and not that of my corp or alliance
Rattman	Posted - 2004.08.20 11:39:00 - [3] Edited by: Rattman on 20/08/2004 12:11:58 Edited because I put my foot in my mouth. So I guess its time to goto bed Rattman All opinions, rambling or not, expressed here are my own and not that of my corp or alliance
Rattman	Posted - 2004.08.20 11:39:00 - [4] Edited by: Rattman on 20/08/2004 12:11:58 Edited because I put my foot in my mouth. So I guess its time to goto bed Rattman All opinions, rambling or not, expressed here are my own and not that of my corp or alliance
Rattman	Posted - 2004.08.20 12:09:00 - [5] Originally by: SKiNNiEH @ Jack Birrent: for some people, this game is not only about who to F1-F8 today... Some really like the politics, friendships, cloak and dagger type of side that EVE has. @ Rattman: he meant you made a typo... "with" should be "without" :) edting now All opinions, rambling or not, expressed here are my own and not that of my corp or alliance
Rattman	Posted - 2004.08.20 12:09:00 - [6] Originally by: SKiNNiEH @ Jack Birrent: for some people, this game is not only about who to F1-F8 today... Some really like the politics, friendships, cloak and dagger type of side that EVE has. @ Rattman: he meant you made a typo... "with" should be "without" :) edting now All opinions, rambling or not, expressed here are my own and not that of my corp or alliance
Rattman	Posted - 2004.08.20 21:29:00 - [7] Out of all of this there has been no discussion about a resolution. The simplest would be give each of the 3 major protaginest a region FA could get querious because BA is currently there (Strategically delve would be better, closer to home for FA, easier for FA to defend) CFS get period basis DSMA could get delve That would give each a region they would be responsible for. Rattman All opinions, rambling or not, expressed here are my own and not that of my corp or alliance
Rattman	Posted - 2004.08.20 21:29:00 - [8] Out of all of this there has been no discussion about a resolution. The simplest would be give each of the 3 major protaginest a region FA could get querious because BA is currently there (Strategically delve would be better, closer to home for FA, easier for FA to defend) CFS get period basis DSMA could get delve That would give each a region they would be responsible for. Rattman All opinions, rambling or not, expressed here are my own and not that of my corp or alliance
Rattman	Posted - 2004.08.21 01:02:00 - [9] Originally by: Katya Detia I dont think CFS would like that ^_^ Then there star alliance aswell.. hehe Nitpick: DSMA lives in Period basis hehe OK my idea was posted when I woke up and was still having my first cup of coffee. I really mean it as a over all idea. Not a specific solutions. The idea of the 3 protagonist having a different regions would lead to a positives for all FA getting a region would allow them to defend it easier CFS getting a region they could have actuall control of the stations and able to use and set thier own tax instead of someone else controlling thier destiny. DSMA would have same Star Alliance could be an issue. I know little to nothing about them Rattman All opinions, rambling or not, expressed here are my own and not that of my corp or alliance
Rattman	Posted - 2004.08.21 01:02:00 - [10] Originally by: Katya Detia I dont think CFS would like that ^_^ Then there star alliance aswell.. hehe Nitpick: DSMA lives in Period basis hehe OK my idea was posted when I woke up and was still having my first cup of coffee. I really mean it as a over all idea. Not a specific solutions. The idea of the 3 protagonist having a different regions would lead to a positives for all FA getting a region would allow them to defend it easier CFS getting a region they could have actuall control of the stations and able to use and set thier own tax instead of someone else controlling thier destiny. DSMA would have same Star Alliance could be an issue. I know little to nothing about them Rattman All opinions, rambling or not, expressed here are my own and not that of my corp or alliance
Rattman	Posted - 2004.08.21 05:24:00 - [11] Originally by: Katya Detia A: FA cant let go of one station... How are they gonna take losing 2 regions worth of stations. B: CFS wont wanna lose 2 regions, and i can understand this.. C: Star alliance help defend aswell.. so they will want a share.. A: By retracting thier claim on 2 of the regions, they would retain control of one. This would give several advantages as it will make it easier to control and defend as they do not atm have enough forces to defend the 3 regions and plus maintain their forces in Fountain and in cache They can restrict or allow access to whom ever want based on thier policies so they would be able to have tighter control of one region in stead of potentially loosing control of all 3 regions B: CFS could potentially loose access to 2 regions, depending on what forms of access are allowed by FA/DSMA to the region they control, as compensation they would gain true control of one region as they would control the stations with the ability to set thier own tax and make thier owns rules C: This is the only real one I dont have any practical suggestions for, as I do not know much about star alliance. Maybe they could be a representitives for fountain in thier region, or as military for one of the 3 regions CFS for example. I don't know what they are good at or want to achive in the region. Rattman All opinions, rambling or not, expressed here are my own and not that of my corp or alliance
Rattman	Posted - 2004.08.21 05:24:00 - [12] Originally by: Katya Detia A: FA cant let go of one station... How are they gonna take losing 2 regions worth of stations. B: CFS wont wanna lose 2 regions, and i can understand this.. C: Star alliance help defend aswell.. so they will want a share.. A: By retracting thier claim on 2 of the regions, they would retain control of one. This would give several advantages as it will make it easier to control and defend as they do not atm have enough forces to defend the 3 regions and plus maintain their forces in Fountain and in cache They can restrict or allow access to whom ever want based on thier policies so they would be able to have tighter control of one region in stead of potentially loosing control of all 3 regions B: CFS could potentially loose access to 2 regions, depending on what forms of access are allowed by FA/DSMA to the region they control, as compensation they would gain true control of one region as they would control the stations with the ability to set thier own tax and make thier owns rules C: This is the only real one I dont have any practical suggestions for, as I do not know much about star alliance. Maybe they could be a representitives for fountain in thier region, or as military for one of the 3 regions CFS for example. I don't know what they are good at or want to achive in the region. Rattman All opinions, rambling or not, expressed here are my own and not that of my corp or alliance

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.