Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ryoken McKeon
Galactic Defence Syndicate Eradication Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 21:23:00 -
[31]
Edited by: Ryoken McKeon on 25/03/2009 21:23:29 OP is amarr....hmmm
Page 2 snypa
|
Psalms
|
Posted - 2009.03.26 04:29:00 -
[32]
GOOD!!
Falcons are for steers or *****s... and i dont see any bulls!!!!
|
4 LOM
United Gamers
|
Posted - 2009.03.26 04:59:00 -
[33]
Originally by: GTC seller72
And i have eyes and 6 years of eve experiance that tells me that close range recons are NOT used in gang even close to med sized in gang vs gang combat because they just die and cost a lot.
I would love to see this 6 years of experiance with recon ships in eve... very impressive that you got to play wtih them long before they were introduced.
Originally by: Twilight Moon of course you have nice hair. That pod goo, is actually VO5 conditioner.
|
GTC seller72
|
Posted - 2009.03.26 10:05:00 -
[34]
Originally by: 4 LOM
Originally by: GTC seller72
And i have eyes and 6 years of eve experiance that tells me that close range recons are NOT used in gang even close to med sized in gang vs gang combat because they just die and cost a lot.
I would love to see this 6 years of experiance with recon ships in eve... very impressive that you got to play wtih them long before they were introduced.
Did i say in recon ships or did i say 6 years experiance in eve?.
If all you can do is snip, reinterpret and troll maybe you should go back to caod.
|
Azirapheal
Amarr Purgatorial Janitors Inc.
|
Posted - 2009.03.26 12:06:00 -
[35]
Originally by: GTC seller72
Originally by: 4 LOM
Originally by: GTC seller72
And i have eyes and 6 years of eve experiance that tells me that close range recons are NOT used in gang even close to med sized in gang vs gang combat because they just die and cost a lot.
I would love to see this 6 years of experiance with recon ships in eve... very impressive that you got to play wtih them long before they were introduced.
Did i say in recon ships or did i say 6 years experiance in eve?.
If all you can do is snip, reinterpret and troll maybe you should go back to caod.
its irrelevant because of the way you keep going on. post with your damn main and prove your 6 years experience. ive got 3 years experience of killing people. and have taken up mission running in my spare time while i wait for every "customer" to not have a falcon alt to completely **** the game up.
if its used by everyone. its a no-brainer choice no brainer choices get nerfed.
Originally by: Grohalmatar The proposed changes in the game development forum are obviously a nerf to falcon pilots. However, what they really are is a nerf to falcon alts.
|
GTC seller72
|
Posted - 2009.03.26 12:30:00 -
[36]
Edited by: GTC seller72 on 26/03/2009 12:32:01
Originally by: Azirapheal
its irrelevant because of the way you keep going on. post with your damn main and prove your 6 years experience. ive got 3 years experience of killing people. and have taken up mission running in my spare time while i wait for every "customer" to not have a falcon alt to completely **** the game up.
if its used by everyone. its a no-brainer choice no brainer choices get nerfed.
Interesting logic....kill anything off that works.
Everybody uses dmg dealers, everybody uses mwd's and most gangs have a lot of webs and points........are they next by your logic?.
The other recons are so poor because of their available range that nobody really uses them in gang v gang combat and ppl like you wanna reduce the falcon to the same uselessness.
At least the other recons can be used in solo or small 2-3 man gank teams effectivly even with reduced range because of their gaurenteed effect being relyable enough to plan tactics around. The falcon at close range is still chance based meaning it is not relyable enough to do so.
Along with that you have the fact that TD's, damps ect are regularly fitted on non-bonused gank/tank ships to great effect in gang combat also due to their relyable effect even without a bonus from a ship.
This nerf has the effect of making ECM and the recons that use them obsolite for any kind of combat, when instead CCP should be giving ECCM a boost and a secondary effect, they should also give the other recons a range bonus to some of their effects and maybe even give SDA's the ability to effect some of the other ewar systems.....THAT WOULD BE A BALANCING.
What they are doing is not a "fix" or a "balancing" it is a utter nerfing and effective removal of a entire ship and module from any reasonable and effective use in actual pvp on TQ.
|
Dzil
Caldari TankSox Industries
|
Posted - 2009.03.26 13:31:00 -
[37]
Originally by: NoNah
Originally by: Mrs Snowman complaining about people complaining means you suck even more than they do.
Oh Irony, thy name is you.
For full ironic effect, you should start a whine pyramid.
|
Trebor Notlimah
Lone Star EVE Group Veni Vidi Vici
|
Posted - 2009.03.26 15:22:00 -
[38]
BOOOOOHOOOOOOOOO!
The Falcon will still hands down be the best recon after the nerf. And btw, I'm sure you we're all aboard the previous nerf-wagons but as soon as a nerf comes around effecting YOUR ship -- suddenly it is terrible....
STFU and jam at 100km instead of 200km you pansie.
|
Essence Praetor
|
Posted - 2009.03.26 17:51:00 -
[39]
I vote this thread gets a sticky. Just for the sake of LOL
|
Eternum Praetorian
Dynaverse Corporation Vertigo Coalition
|
Posted - 2009.03.26 17:52:00 -
[40]
And so does my alt...
...does this qualify as copy paste threading?
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |