|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Gnulpie
Minmatar
Miner Tech
   |
Posted - 2009.03.25 20:18:00 -
[1]
LOOOOL CCP
|
Gnulpie
Minmatar
Miner Tech
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 20:37:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: GM Grimmi
We appreciate the feedback from everyone. After reviewing all of these very valid concerns, we were compelled to go back over the information we’d collected in this case and carefully weighed it again against the precedents set in the past. Ultimately, we felt we had no other recourse than to reverse the name change, the key factor being that during this re-investigation we learned that the KenZoku alliance was created several months before the BoB alliance leadership switched hands. That being the case, the name change request was not submitted within a timely manner, as it had been in the legacy cases we were holding up as examples.
Bad, very bad CCP.
Either you are complete idiots (because you didn't know after TWO MONTHS of investigation that KenZoku was created several months before BoB was disbanded) or you are utter morons (because you just do what the loudest whiners on the forums demand) or you just lied about the reasons why you changed and re-changed the names.
But it seems that AGAIN the goons with their threadnaugh whining-campain has massive success to blackmail CCP in doing what the goons want.
Carrier nerf goon-threadnaught?
Dev-debugging a goon capital shipyard threadnaught?
I really thought that CCP got professional during 2008 and wouldn't give in into any threadnaught/blackmail-attempt of a very small player base.
Obviously I was wrong.
|
Gnulpie
Minmatar
Miner Tech
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 21:25:00 -
[3]
So ... BoB petitioned right after they got disbanded. CCP took more than their time and considered that case very carefully and after two months of thorough investigation they decided to grant the petition.
Goons learn about the petition and pull some of their connections and the next day the petition is reversed, telling us that the results and facts of two months investigation which were presented to us just one day ago are all fraud and invalid and therefore the originally granted petition must be declined now.
THIS STINKS!!!
I call for Internal Affairs. A more obvious and blunt misconduct I haven't seen in here.
|
Gnulpie
Minmatar
Miner Tech
|
Posted - 2009.03.26 09:02:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Colonel Xaven
Originally by: Sissy Fuzz
[edit
You are incompetent, CCP.
Not incompetent, but not strict when it comes to special people's rule breaking needs.
What a ****ing piece of sh!t! BoB wrote a petition about getting back their name. HOW IS THAT RULE BREAKING?
But CCP really were very very lazy and took TWO MONTH time to come to a decision.
And when goons disliked that decision, they started crying, a threadnaught and blackmailing attempts and CCP completely reversed their decision WITHIN ONE DAY!
There can't be a more clear case of misconduct, but this will be hushed up and silenced quickly.
Very poor, CCP. There is not even the slightest trace of professionalism in here. You give in to 2% of your player base (goons / total subscribers) and show clear favourism. This is another ugly stain. I thought favourism and special treatment for very small groups of players were past - obviously it continues stronger than ever.
|
Gnulpie
Minmatar
Miner Tech
|
Posted - 2009.03.26 17:28:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Vladic Ka
The thing you guys are forgetting, the real difference between the CoW disbandment and the BoB disbandment was that it was an intentional act by a disgruntled member that disbanded BoB. CoW were either bugged by a non-receipt of a mail or just stupid.
BoB were silly enough to leave the access open to anyone.
Err, hello? How is that ANY difference?
BoB was silly enough to give a disgruntled member director access, CoW was silly enough not to pay the alliance bill. What is there the difference? Both alliances were disbanded.
But why was it so far ALWAYS FORBIDDEN to hold alliance names hostages (the CoW incident clearly shows this) but Goons are allowed to do exactly the same thing which was so far always forbidden?
WHY THIS SPECIAL TREATMENT AND FAVOURISM??
|
|
|
| |
|