|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 34 post(s) |
Hesperius
   |
Posted - 2009.03.31 14:09:00 -
[1]
Is there any reason in the world you can not add this ship to the current line up? Give the current one the Ishukone cammo look to fit in with the snipe role like the Harpy, and the new one the totally worthless anyone who knows better won't fly it Lai Dai orange skin?
If anyone actually thinks this is a good idea, Ill be on Singularity so you can prove to me how awesome it is. |
Hesperius
|
Posted - 2009.03.31 14:50:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Hesperius on 31/03/2009 14:50:43
Rookies who can not fly SB or do not take the time to learn to fly SB ask for silly things for the SB in the Features and Requests forum. There are actually A LOT of these people. So it would seem to me that CCP sees this, more so than people actually using them in game, and think that they need a change.
It sucks that they are going to make people who use them not want to use them, and the people who thought that they would use them "if"... find out that their idea was not so good after all. Then perhaps one day someone in the features request forum will say "Hey can we make SB useful and put cruise missiles on them?" and perhaps there will be someone new at CCP who thinks this is a new idea the cycle begins again.
|
Hesperius
|
Posted - 2009.03.31 16:42:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Malena Panic
It's not that simple. Many ship classes exist to provide support roles in a well-organized gang. This proposal positions the Stealth Bomber as a damage support ship, offering unmatched stealthy damage with significant drawbacks.
If you have an alt that fly's the bomber, then I apologize. However I looked at your Veto kill board and did not see any activity with your character and a stealth bomber. I really do not like how people who do not fly them think they have some grounds to suggest how they can be improved.
The SB has an awesome role it fills right now, there is absolutely no reason to change it. Not one bit, not even warping while cloaked, Id take cloaking till it gets nerfed back to normal. This torp idea sucks. How many short range damage dealers do we need in this game?
If by a specific role you mean we need a ship that would look awesome in EFT and do crap all in the game, then yeah add a second SB to the lineup.
Pleas CCP, can you just make two stealth bombers. Leave the one we use now as is, and add a second line of them for whatever you think would be good.
|
Hesperius
|
Posted - 2009.03.31 17:19:00 -
[4]
Nagatok = Ranger 1 alt?
Yeah Ranger 1 you have quite a few kills with the SB. Is there any reason you can think of that there is a need to remove the SB we use today? Why not just add a second bomber? Everyone would be happy.
|
Hesperius
|
Posted - 2009.03.31 17:28:00 -
[5]
It would be wise to use your alt with creditability to post next time Malena.
|
Hesperius
|
Posted - 2009.03.31 17:43:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Cerui Tarshiel
Oh and as for the OMFG I-TRAINED-THIS-SKILL-SO-YOU-CANT-MAEK-IT-USELESS, well, suck it up...
Red 5 Studios thanks you
|
Hesperius
|
Posted - 2009.04.03 16:01:00 -
[7]
After several hours on the test server - I still do not like this. One guy had a decent fit for a bomber that was sig tanking, which was pretty nice for this new role. I just want my cruise launching frig back...
I can see making a bomber that is easier for rookies to fly, but really why not give us a secondary bomber? OR give us (the current SB pilots) a pirate faction frig that would fill the role you are taking away from us?
|
Hesperius
|
Posted - 2009.04.03 16:46:00 -
[8]
Since they are taking the bomber class from us...
Mortar Class
|
Hesperius
|
Posted - 2009.04.15 14:10:00 -
[9]
40 pages... wow.
So did CCP go with logic and make 2 different bombers? Or are they sticking with the never going to be good to anyone but goons and the napfest blob torp config?
|
Hesperius
|
Posted - 2009.05.02 22:29:00 -
[10]
I still miss my bomber
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|