| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 14 post(s) |
Pudface
   |
Posted - 2004.08.25 08:29:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Kelly O'Connor
While it fits the dictionary definition of "news", it doesnt fit the modern meaning of the word, that is, information people might actually be interested in 
While I personaly may not have been over all interested in the topic the fact that it had been written was enough for me to read it it wont influence me any, or should I say it wouldnt have if not for the reaction of the one Shadow Company responce now im intrigued and wonder if there is anything to the initial cliams even though they have been refutted in earler post the OTT reaction has made me ponder.
(Grammar and spelling are not included in this post so sorry for any literal offence)
|
Pudface
|
Posted - 2004.08.25 08:29:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Kelly O'Connor
While it fits the dictionary definition of "news", it doesnt fit the modern meaning of the word, that is, information people might actually be interested in
While I personaly may not have been over all interested in the topic the fact that it had been written was enough for me to read it it wont influence me any, or should I say it wouldnt have if not for the reaction of the one Shadow Company responce now im intrigued and wonder if there is anything to the initial cliams even though they have been refutted in earler post the OTT reaction has made me ponder.
(Grammar and spelling are not included in this post so sorry for any literal offence)
|
Pudface
|
Posted - 2004.08.25 16:16:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Alowishus
I'm posting merely because the article has no solid evidence of anything, yet lables Shadow as a bad corp. I am loyal to Shadow and Stain and as we can see many people in Stain are loyal to us. But I guess we are just a "Bad Stain" as the title of the gossip would (intentionally?) lead you to believe.
Personaly I read it to have asked the question is shadow company a bad corp Information recieved by shar researched then contact with the main "Players" who by his own inefficient way of responding ontop of information gathered from other sources seems to be the reason the story went to print.
[sarcasm]Oh and on that 80% just remember 99.9% of statistic's are made up the other 23.5% is truth[/sarcasm]
|
Pudface
|
Posted - 2004.08.25 16:16:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Alowishus
I'm posting merely because the article has no solid evidence of anything, yet lables Shadow as a bad corp. I am loyal to Shadow and Stain and as we can see many people in Stain are loyal to us. But I guess we are just a "Bad Stain" as the title of the gossip would (intentionally?) lead you to believe.
Personaly I read it to have asked the question is shadow company a bad corp Information recieved by shar researched then contact with the main "Players" who by his own inefficient way of responding ontop of information gathered from other sources seems to be the reason the story went to print.
[sarcasm]Oh and on that 80% just remember 99.9% of statistic's are made up the other 23.5% is truth[/sarcasm]
|
| |
|