|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Retribution
5
   |
Posted - 2011.10.26 03:08:00 -
[1] - Quote
+1 agree whole heartedly, time for your bs loki **** to die. |
Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Retribution
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 03:11:00 -
[2] - Quote
King Rothgar wrote:
Like it or not, off grid boosting is currently about the only thing keeping "solo" and small gang pvp alive.
Most idiotic statement said yet. that is the one thing driving solo/smallgang pvp away the most. |
Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Retribution
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 11:45:00 -
[3] - Quote
bump |
Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Retribution
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 08:39:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jag Kara wrote:I can go with this one. It always seemed weird that with no intel, sight or any connection to a battlefield, a command ship is "commanding" the fight. This would certainly help aliviate other issues as well. Such as, t3's being better command ships than a purpose built command ship, offgrid/pos boosters, and command alts. (personally, i think if you can play the game afk and still produce a noticable effect you should suffer a nerf.) even froma pve perspecive, this would kill the 6 link tengus for incursion fleets.
This ^^^
the t3 is a better booster than the commandship. should be reverse. |
Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Retribution
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 05:29:00 -
[5] - Quote
when your commanding a fleet your on grid. plane and simple. deal with it.
you dont see the great captain picard in his commandship giving orders from earth do ya?
|
Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Retribution
29
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 02:36:00 -
[6] - Quote
its quiet simple. CCP either wants players with money $$$, to buy more accounts. done they get a pvp account and a t3 boosting account.
now the ones without the $$$, get screwed cause they cant compete in a 1v1. or have to have 25% more numbers to fight and the booster fleet runs and complains they 'blobed em' mean while the ones without the $$$ thus rage quit.
sooooo the solution is make the boosts, on grid only.
the only people who 'dont support it' are ones with boosters who very style of pvp IS the booster alt. totaly fine they are defending their style of game play. but mine is better, so deal. |
Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Retribution
33
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 07:12:00 -
[7] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:Hirana Yoshida wrote:Quote:In case gang-link mods are not made on-grid in near future:
- Command and Control Jamming module.
Blocks all (friendly and hostile alike) gang-link communications from off-grid. Just added this idea to CCPs module brainstorming request in Test forum, might be an outright alternative to changing mechanics in the first place if a decent/competitive hull can be found to carry them. Make them fit in gang link slots ;)
it should be the new destroyer hull's role.
since theyve expanded all other classes of ships except destroyers. |
Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Retribution
33
|
Posted - 2012.02.08 04:51:00 -
[8] - Quote
Hirana Yoshida wrote:Flyinghotpocket wrote:it should be the new destroyer hull's role.
since theyve expanded all other classes of ships except destroyers. Destroyers are not exactly known for their lightning speed or extreme tanks .. a fleet could just have a sniper or speedy HAC clear Destroyers of the field and keep doing what they do with nigh unkillable safe-spotted T3s Bumpin' for great Justice!
destroyer are now known for the extreme tanks and somewhat good speed. (sig radius rediction) in keeping with that i wouldnt at all suggest that a new destroyer either it be t2 hull or a completely new destroyer hull. i would never even suggest it have the horrible signarture it once had and the interdictor still does. |
Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Retribution
Amarr 7th Fleet
45
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 00:50:00 -
[9] - Quote
bump |
|
|
| |
|