| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Tippia
Raddick Explorations
BlackWater.
   |
Posted - 2009.04.15 17:33:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Nicole Sheridan
In a small gang fight, a battleship has no chance in winning a battle against a team that is ECM capable.
"A battleship" is not a small gang, and as such should lose against a team that uses numerous vectors of attack.
Quote:
ECM does not really have a true counter balance. Especially since ECCM does not work well.
If there's any ship where ECCM actually starts working, it's battleships. Battleships also tend to be very good at the whole spider-X:ing thing, and one of the things you can do is remote ECCM which is even more effective than the regular kind. Or you could just have a support fleet that simply nukes those ECM ships.
Quote:
IMHO, weakening the battleship (not give it ability to defend against ECM) is tampering with the fundmental core of EVE mechanic for the entire universe
Again, battleships are better than most ships against denfending against ECCM. Also, what's this "fundamental core" thing you're talking about? If anything is fundamental to EVE, it's the fact that everything has a weakness.
Quote:
If you don't see what I am talking about, I recommend that you take a look at why the Dev team are nerfing ECM.
…or you could just tell us your interpretation rather than give us some irrelevant allusions (which rather make it seem like you have no argument and hope that no-one will call you on it).
———
“If you're not willing to fight for what you have in =v=…
you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.”
— Karath Piki |
Tippia
Raddick Explorations
BlackWater.
|
Posted - 2009.04.15 19:54:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Tippia on 15/04/2009 19:53:46
Originally by: Nicole Sheridan
If I am wrong, then why CCP is nerfing ECM ships?
-Becuase ECM ships are unbalancing the core foundation of EVE.
Yes, but it is not the thing you think is a core foundation.
———
“If you're not willing to fight for what you have in =v=…
you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.”
— Karath Piki |
Tippia
Raddick Explorations
BlackWater.
|
Posted - 2009.04.15 20:47:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Sebea
Originally by: Nicole Sheridan
I am wrong
You could have shortened it all to this and we'd have understood
Weeeell… technically, we would only have known it — without the OP's excellent description of the underlying causes, we wouldn't have understood why it was true.
———
“If you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡…
you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.”
— Karath Piki |
Tippia
Raddick Explorations
BlackWater.
|
Posted - 2009.04.15 20:53:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Nicole Sheridan
CCP is nerfing your ECM. The debate is over. Congrat to CCP...
What debate? You're making a statement (which, btw, is wrong on two accounts: it has nothing to do with battleships, and ECM is actually being buffed).
We're simply explaining why your assertions are wrong…
———
“If you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡…
you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.”
— Karath Piki |
| |
|