| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Antaiir
Gallente
Eat My Shorts Inc.
Freelancer Coalition
   |
Posted - 2009.05.11 12:13:00 -
[31]
 Originally by: Skabnek
Please NERF CLOAK!!
Lol, nerf things just you can't handle them?
Can i have your stuff? 
|
Sniper Wolf18
Gallente
A Pretty Pony Princess
General Tso's Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.05.11 12:17:00 -
[32]
Originally by: Rostran Targo
+How is babby formed?
They need to do way instain mother> who kill thier babbys. becuse these babby cant frigth back?
it was on the news this mroing a mother in ar who had kill her three kids . they are taking the three babby back to new york too lady to rest my pary are with the father who lost his chrilden ; i am truley sorry for your lots
And to finish, thank you for reading my sig
--------------------------------------------------
If you are still reading i would probably hav posted by now |
Yakoff
Alcatraz Inc.
THE INTERSTELLAR FOUNDRY
|
Posted - 2009.05.11 13:07:00 -
[33]
Finding cloakers is easy. Have all your fleet in battleships and spread out throughout the system. Then generate an inverse tachyon beam to all ships. This will create an entire net throughout the system. The cloacker will pass through one of them eventually and the tachyon particles will be stuck to his/her ship and will be detectible.
___
It deosnt mttaer waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, olny taht the frist and lsat leettr be in the rghit pclae. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef. |
Max Khaos
Anger Management
|
Posted - 2009.05.11 13:23:00 -
[34]
Edited by: Max Khaos on 11/05/2009 13:24:23
My Solution .....
1) Give a cloak 5000 cpu fitting requirement ....
2) Give a 100% cpu reduction to ships designed to cloak ....
3) Delay local ...
|
Djana Libra
Caldari
Federation of Freedom Fighters
Aggression.
|
Posted - 2009.05.11 13:39:00 -
[35]
blulululu
Cloakers don't really pose a threat now do they, just keep your eyes on intel channels and watch for cyno fields
<SIG>
I bought the wife a toy Deimos to have fun with while i play eve!
</SIG> |
Sun Clausewitz
|
Posted - 2009.05.11 14:01:00 -
[36]
WTS Service:
AFK Cloaking to shut down systems. Eve-Mail for rates
Pick Three:
Caldari/PVP/Solo/Success |
Scarlette Harlette
|
Posted - 2009.05.11 14:02:00 -
[37]
Originally by: baltec1
Im in your system, panicing your ratters.
lmao
|
ColdChimera
Gallente
New Eden World Trading Company
|
Posted - 2009.05.11 14:15:00 -
[38]
Suck it up.
|
Shanija
|
Posted - 2009.05.11 14:41:00 -
[39]
AFK cloaking as a weapon doesn't really seem balanced from a design perspective. It costs much less effort to do than it takes to defend against it, which is a problem.
|
Sun Clausewitz
|
Posted - 2009.05.11 15:10:00 -
[40]
Originally by: Shanija
AFK cloaking as a weapon doesn't really seem balanced from a design perspective. It costs much less effort to do than it takes to defend against it, which is a problem.
Defending agaisnt it?!?!?!? Just ignore it
Pick Three:
Caldari/PVP/Solo/Success |
MidnightMartyr
Gallente
Suddenly Ninjas
Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
|
Posted - 2009.05.11 15:21:00 -
[41]
Originally by: Rostran Targo
+How is babby formed?
How girl get pregnant?
|
Brizae
|
Posted - 2009.05.11 15:35:00 -
[42]
Originally by: MidnightMartyr
How girl get pregnant?
AFK cloakers visit them during downtime and .......
|
Rordan D'Kherr
Amarr
|
Posted - 2009.05.11 15:46:00 -
[43]
Originally by: Shanija
AFK cloaking as a weapon doesn't really seem balanced from a design perspective. It costs much less effort to do than it takes to defend against it, which is a problem.
WTB dps figures.
|
Lonzo Kincaid
Black Nova Corp
KenZoku
|
Posted - 2009.05.11 15:54:00 -
[44]
image thanks to Grek Forto of Malevolent Intentions;
----------------------
Quote:
The rule of thumb is you have to outnumber them 2:1 before you even think about engaging them
|
Shanija
|
Posted - 2009.05.11 16:56:00 -
[45]
Originally by: Sun Clausewitz
Originally by: Shanija
AFK cloaking as a weapon doesn't really seem balanced from a design perspective. It costs much less effort to do than it takes to defend against it, which is a problem.
Defending agaisnt it?!?!?!? Just ignore it
Then sooner or later it uncloaks, warps to a ship of yours and blows it up, then goes back to hiding. Your only option is to modify your operations around that possibility, which takes a lot more effort than being AFK does.
That's where the imbalance comes in. 
|
Sun Clausewitz
|
Posted - 2009.05.11 17:04:00 -
[46]
Originally by: Shanija
Originally by: Sun Clausewitz
Originally by: Shanija
AFK cloaking as a weapon doesn't really seem balanced from a design perspective. It costs much less effort to do than it takes to defend against it, which is a problem.
Defending agaisnt it?!?!?!? Just ignore it
Then sooner or later it uncloaks, warps to a ship of yours and blows it up, then goes back to hiding. Your only option is to modify your operations around that possibility, which takes a lot more effort than being AFK does.
That's where the imbalance comes in.
Is this your main?
Pick Three:
Caldari/PVP/Solo/Success |
Lonzo Kincaid
Black Nova Corp
KenZoku
|
Posted - 2009.05.11 17:04:00 -
[47]
Originally by: Shanija
Originally by: Sun Clausewitz
Originally by: Shanija
AFK cloaking as a weapon doesn't really seem balanced from a design perspective. It costs much less effort to do than it takes to defend against it, which is a problem.
Defending agaisnt it?!?!?!? Just ignore it
Then sooner or later it uncloaks, warps to a ship of yours and blows it up, then goes back to hiding. Your only option is to modify your operations around that possibility, which takes a lot more effort than being AFK does.
That's where the imbalance comes in.
or have the often semi-afk guys in the station who would love an easy kill to sit in TS while you do what you're doing and in gang so they can react quickly.
You just want to have it easy and dock/cloak moment you see somebody appear in local.
----------------------
Quote:
The rule of thumb is you have to outnumber them 2:1 before you even think about engaging them
|
WillageGirl
Celtic Anarchy
|
Posted - 2009.05.11 17:46:00 -
[48]
Originally by: Sun Clausewitz
Originally by: Shanija
Originally by: Sun Clausewitz
Originally by: Shanija
AFK cloaking as a weapon doesn't really seem balanced from a design perspective. It costs much less effort to do than it takes to defend against it, which is a problem.
Defending agaisnt it?!?!?!? Just ignore it
Then sooner or later it uncloaks, warps to a ship of yours and blows it up, then goes back to hiding. Your only option is to modify your operations around that possibility, which takes a lot more effort than being AFK does.
That's where the imbalance comes in.
Is this your main?
It's always a real pleasure to read about those brave AFK cloakers who uncloak go kill something and hide again without even being there.
I want to be that guy! 
Fighting for Our right to Cloak since 2004 |
Shanija
|
Posted - 2009.05.12 11:26:00 -
[49]
Originally by: Lonzo Kincaid
or have the often semi-afk guys in the station who would love an easy kill to sit in TS while you do what you're doing and in gang so they can react quickly.
That could be a nice solution, if you have the luxury of semi-AFK combat pilots hanging around in that system and ready to respond; but even if you do, the cost of defending against it (having combat pilots ready whenever anyone wants to do anything, and suspending any operation that involves anything that will die before the combat pilots can respond) is still a lot more than the cost of doing it (parking a ship at a safe and going to work or whatever). I don't think that leads to interesting gameplay, but boring gameplay.
It's not interesting to be a combat pilot standing by tied to the game because someone cloaked might attack but probably won't. It's boring, and if it's boring then it's probably bad gameplay.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |