| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Meridius
|
Posted - 2004.09.07 00:35:00 -
[1]
I'm sick of saying it so i'll stick to putting it simply.
Cruiser > Assault Frigate
They need to be put back on the drawing board. ________________________________________________________
|

Meridius
|
Posted - 2004.09.07 00:35:00 -
[2]
I'm sick of saying it so i'll stick to putting it simply.
Cruiser > Assault Frigate
They need to be put back on the drawing board. ________________________________________________________
|

Meridius
|
Posted - 2004.09.07 02:45:00 -
[3]
Heavy pulses on a maller can rip apart a webbed interceptor. An assault frigate has a larger signature radius + it's a whole lot slower. How do you think it would do?
The problem is not confined to missles. ________________________________________________________
|

Meridius
|
Posted - 2004.09.07 02:45:00 -
[4]
Heavy pulses on a maller can rip apart a webbed interceptor. An assault frigate has a larger signature radius + it's a whole lot slower. How do you think it would do?
The problem is not confined to missles. ________________________________________________________
|

Meridius
|
Posted - 2004.09.07 06:39:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Gaiam
Originally by: Negotiator Gaiam, fyi - you dont have any valid arguments...just thought i'd mention that.
first thing i asked panzy is why assaults should be better than cruisers. then the losers chimed in.
so for your information ****head i DID have a valid arguement before istvaan came on with his usual charm, the rest of you people supporting him or trying to insult me are no higher class than he is.
....just thought i'd mention that.
Gaiam.
Answer this.
If a cruiser can do everything an assault frigate can do but BETTER and costs LESS and can be FULLY insured why in gods name would you use an assault frigate?
[/civil] ________________________________________________________
|

Meridius
|
Posted - 2004.09.07 06:39:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Gaiam
Originally by: Negotiator Gaiam, fyi - you dont have any valid arguments...just thought i'd mention that.
first thing i asked panzy is why assaults should be better than cruisers. then the losers chimed in.
so for your information ****head i DID have a valid arguement before istvaan came on with his usual charm, the rest of you people supporting him or trying to insult me are no higher class than he is.
....just thought i'd mention that.
Gaiam.
Answer this.
If a cruiser can do everything an assault frigate can do but BETTER and costs LESS and can be FULLY insured why in gods name would you use an assault frigate?
[/civil] ________________________________________________________
|
| |
|