| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Epiphaniess
Verboten Technologies
512
   |
Posted - 2012.05.10 21:51:00 -
[1] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:I loled :D
(I do want T3 BSs tho ;) )
Why would they add T3 BS, when they still don't have any decent pvp oriented T2 BS?
Marauders, are pve and gimped for pvp.
And Black Ops are still terrible, glorified jump bridges.
Don't expect anymore T3 for awhile, they seem to be really hard to balance right with out them just taking over. They still have not come up with the 5 subsystem set and have quietly forgotten about it. |
Epiphaniess
Verboten Technologies
512
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 22:19:00 -
[2] - Quote
Miilla wrote:Epiphaniess wrote:Jack Miton wrote:I loled :D
(I do want T3 BSs tho ;) ) Why would they add T3 BS, when they still don't have any decent pvp oriented T2 BS? Marauders, are pve and gimped for pvp. And Black Ops are still terrible, glorified jump bridges. Don't expect anymore T3 for awhile, they seem to be really hard to balance right with out them just taking over. They still have not come up with the 5 subsystem set and have quietly forgotten about it. They had planned t3 modules and other t3 stuff, typical CCP, once its a new feature, its patched to nerfinity then let rot.
It does appear at times that CCP has a habit of putting something in the game then forgetting about it. What it really is it takes them a really long time to get back to it. I don't know if that is bad or good or both but it is frustrating. Ask the Faction Warfare people. But it may not be so bad, you don't want to break the game to much to often for that will frustrate people as well.
It would be nice to see some T3 modules and other T3 stuff. But the reason we have not yet is that anything like that would probably out shine T1 so much and make T2 the ugly red head middle child, that it would cause a whole lot of issues.
T3 modules would need to be a whole new distinct entity, not just better preforming versions of what we got currently.
Maybe the player base should think of suggestions? |
Epiphaniess
Verboten Technologies
512
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 22:22:00 -
[3] - Quote
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:I am laughing at the ones that are still confusing "Tech" and "Tier" with each other.
That might be one of the reasons why CCP is planing on moving away from the Tier system. In the future revamping of all the ships.
|
Epiphaniess
Verboten Technologies
512
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 22:26:00 -
[4] - Quote
Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:I would rather have modular POS first before new T3 craft.
The last news for T3 was the next line would be smaller than a crusier over a year or more down the road from the last massive "answer all questions" topic that failed miserably halfway through. Yet with the tier tear down now, it may be all up in the air whats to come shipwise.
Modular POS...LOL that has been talked about and on the "list" for so long, it must be in the same area of revamping mining and a few other legacies.
But it is something that would be nice and probably should be done. |
| |
|