EVE Search - Is it time to let the "big boys" in Hi-Sec?

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Is it time to let the "big boys" in Hi-Sec?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Graic Gabtar The Lemon Party 188	Posted - 2012.05.11 08:05:00 - [1] - Quote No, not those "big boys", I mean the big capitals. When I was I wee small pilot keeping my sweaty hand very much on the stick I started venturing around Low and Null. I will never forget the first time I was part of a fight where we hot dropped in a crap load of caps. The sight was amazing as the cyno lit and a mess of big ass caps appeared to beat fourteen types of crap out of some carrier. How good would that be for Hi Sec folks to see to encourage them to Null? - No elaborate Hi-Sec cap rules for CCP to manage. - Hard to think they would ever be used to gank. - Push a ton of that easy Hi Sec POS action to Low and Null. - Opens up classes of ships with ++ber cargo holds for massive care bear action. Anyway just a random thought. Troll/flame away, most of you are a bunch of weak ******* cunts anyway. I'm off to get drunk and root something.-á EVE shall be purged by fire - please Gods let them ALL burn in Jita.
Destination SkillQueue Are We There Yet 2354	Posted - 2012.05.11 08:11:00 - [2] - Quote You can't light cynos in highsec for good reasons and capitals can't use gates, so you aren't going to get capitals in highsec. Just accept, that different areas of space are governed by different rules and many people actually prefer things that way. If you want to see caps, you GTFO of highsec.
Alavaria Fera GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 664	Posted - 2012.05.11 08:12:00 - [3] - Quote The Veldspar miners could use Rorqurals ^___^ nothing like more trit. Oh and jump freighters. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd
hedge betts Shiyurida State War Academy Caldari State 6	Posted - 2012.05.11 08:16:00 - [4] - Quote They should allow dreads into high sec. But carriers supper caps and titans have no right to high sec. If they were allowed in there might aswell be no high sec Cup the balls, and work the shaft
Graic Gabtar The Lemon Party 188	Posted - 2012.05.11 08:22:00 - [5] - Quote Ah, crap. My interplanetary shuttle has broken down and I'm stuck at this port. I'd leave but there is this nice blonde hottie across the way. I'm hoping if everyone else jumps off she might be up for a bit of high orbit action. She's about eight months pregnant which is awesome, 'cos I like that kind of thing. I think capital ships everywhere would also get rid of a lot of camping as well. Shake things up a bit. Yeah, she's hot. EVE shall be purged by fire - please Gods let them ALL burn in Jita.
Vera Algaert Republic University Minmatar Republic 100	Posted - 2012.05.11 08:24:00 - [6] - Quote I, too, would like to see neutral rr from a triage carrier
Aron Croup Incompatible Protocol Bittervet Mercenaries 90	Posted - 2012.05.11 08:43:00 - [7] - Quote On one hand, capital blobs are one of the most dull aspects of null-sec PVP and I would hate to see that spill into high-sec. Imagine corporations like RvB and EVE uni being war-decced by alliances with hundreds of capitals... nothing good will come of that. On the other hand, there are nearly no moons left in central high-sec that haven't been claimed by some random tower. Would be nice if that got stirred up a little. On the whole, I think I'm against you idea though. I like that EVE is not uniformly the same all over, and no cyno's in high-sec is one of the things that makes high-sec more interesting, and it also makes owning a capital ship more interesting, as you have to at least go into low-sec if you want to fly one.
Jowen Datloran Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 409	Posted - 2012.05.11 08:51:00 - [8] - Quote I would prefer capitals severely limited in low sec; super capitals completely prohibited, so no, not supporting this. Mr. Science & Trade Institute, EVE Online Lorebook-á
Schalac Apocalypse Reign 43	Posted - 2012.05.11 09:08:00 - [9] - Quote Letting Dreads into highsec to shoot at POS would be fun.
Garnoo Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation 33	Posted - 2012.05.11 09:13:00 - [10] - Quote i dont like the idea of carriers on every lvl4 mission... People are going to try to ruin your day. Get together with others, ruin their day back - this is EvE
Lexmana Imperial Stout 430	Posted - 2012.05.11 09:22:00 - [11] - Quote I see my ships as females mostly ... industrial ships are the "big boys".
Cutter Isaacson Peace n Quiet 76	Posted - 2012.05.11 10:07:00 - [12] - Quote Graic Gabtar wrote: No, not those "big boys", I mean the big capitals. When I was I wee small pilot keeping my sweaty hand very much on the stick I started venturing around Low and Null. I will never forget the first time I was part of a fight where we hot dropped in a crap load of caps. The sight was amazing as the cyno lit and a mess of big ass caps appeared to beat fourteen types of crap out of some carrier. How good would that be for Hi Sec folks to see to encourage them to Null?-á - No elaborate Hi-Sec cap rules for CCP to manage. Lacks decent reason. Graic Gabtar wrote: - Hard to think they would ever be used to gank. Stop taking all those drugs. Graic Gabtar wrote: - Push a ton of that easy Hi Sec POS action to Low and Null. No. Moron. Graic Gabtar wrote: - Opens up classes of ships with ++ber cargo holds for massive care bear action. Freighters, moron. Graic Gabtar wrote: Anyway just a random thought. Troll/flame away, most of you are a bunch of weak ******* cunts anyway. I'm off to get drunk and root something.-á No. Also, calling people cunts is a little sad don't you think?
Christopher AET Segmentum Solar Intrepid Crossing 85	Posted - 2012.05.11 11:34:00 - [13] - Quote To be honest this (Hisec POS bashing) would be better solved with a t2 version of the tier 3 battleship retrofitted to carry XL guns. Give it no drone bay and something of a tracking penalty/dps buff to be applied also. This will render it useless against smaller or equal sized ships. I think should have something like 40% a sieged dreads dps. Of course that's only a very rough outline to my thoughts. As for caps in general in hisec. No. Nullsec needs more reasons to go there not less. I speak only for myself and my corp. My views are not representative of my alliance.
Brooks Puuntai Nomadic Asylum Alliance 99000802 567	Posted - 2012.05.11 11:50:00 - [14] - Quote I would love to see the forums when Goons use a cap and super fleet in Jita.. Yeah sure allow it. Free-áKugutsumen from censorship and end the bitterness.
Marcus Harikari Guitar Players of EVE 40	Posted - 2012.05.11 11:55:00 - [15] - Quote Also, stations in high-sec should be able to be destroyed. Then goons could actually take down jita 4-4. It would be epic.
La Nariz GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 24	Posted - 2012.05.11 12:21:00 - [16] - Quote Marcus Harikari wrote: Also, stations in high-sec should be able to be destroyed. Then goons could actually take down jita 4-4. It would be epic. This needs to happen.
Vertisce Soritenshi Varion Galactic Tragedy. 1639	Posted - 2012.05.11 13:21:00 - [17] - Quote There is a good reason that capitals were removed from High Sec. I remember those days...it was fun but it is also in the past. I think if capitals are allowed back into High Sec along with cyno's there would have to be some pretty heavy restrictions and CONCORD would have to be heavily buffed. EvE is not about PvP.-á EvE is about the SANDBOX!
Tora Bushido Count With Teddy Mercenaries Stay Calm Don't Panic 37	Posted - 2012.05.11 13:35:00 - [18] - Quote Damn you...... this is not a post about the BIG BOYS My resists to bad posts are 78-89-83-90 ....... The metal head plate increased it by 5%.
Tanya Powers Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 1204	Posted - 2012.05.11 13:44:00 - [19] - Quote hedge betts Shiyurida wrote: They should allow dreads into high sec. But carriers supper caps and titans have no right to high sec. If they were allowed in there might aswell be no high sec I don't agree with OP and not with you neither. My opinion is that high sec should be exacly like low/null, completely warfare and caps (carriers/dreads) supers/titans + bubbles not aloud. This would make it far more interesting to see how frontiers expand or retract between factions. Would also throat dig a lot of grieffers that would leave the game rather than play it. No loss overall and a better game for everyone.
Botleten GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 283	Posted - 2012.05.11 14:17:00 - [20] - Quote Subcaps can take care of POS and there isnt anything bigger that needs to be shot, so there's no need for caps in hisec. Lettings capitals in empire would just lead to masses of carrier miner bots who are now immune to ganking
Nephilius Knights of Athena Star Council 414	Posted - 2012.05.11 15:40:00 - [21] - Quote La Nariz wrote: Marcus Harikari wrote: Also, stations in high-sec should be able to be destroyed. Then goons could actually take down jita 4-4. It would be epic. This needs to happen. Then Jita would burn for real and I would be terribly happy...an event that would finally deliver! "If."
zama118 Exclusion Cartel The Kadeshi 23	Posted - 2012.05.11 15:52:00 - [22] - Quote caps in high sec will never happen for one simple reason. caps need to be able to be killed, a smart player in low or null sec can keep his cap safe, a stupid player will lose it. in high sec stupid players will never lose caps, caps need to die. (add in to that bucket the fact that they will be abused in high sec some way then its defo never going to happen)
Apolyon I AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse 38	Posted - 2012.05.11 16:22:00 - [23] - Quote gtfo of HS, carebears!!!!!!
Jessie-A Tassik Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic 176	Posted - 2012.05.11 17:09:00 - [24] - Quote Graic Gabtar wrote: No, not those "big boys", I mean the big capitals. When I was I wee small pilot keeping my sweaty hand very much on the stick I started venturing around Low and Null. I will never forget the first time I was part of a fight where we hot dropped in a crap load of caps. The sight was amazing as the cyno lit and a mess of big ass caps appeared to beat fourteen types of crap out of some carrier. How good would that be for Hi Sec folks to see to encourage them to Null? - No elaborate Hi-Sec cap rules for CCP to manage. - Hard to think they would ever be used to gank. - Push a ton of that easy Hi Sec POS action to Low and Null. - Opens up classes of ships with ++ber cargo holds for massive care bear action. Personal attacks and foul language are against the forum rules. Avoid please. - Guard Cause broken blob mechanics should break high sec to.
Vaerah Vahrokha Vahrokh Consulting 746	Posted - 2012.05.11 17:50:00 - [25] - Quote Graic Gabtar wrote: When I was I wee small pilot keeping my sweaty hand very much on the stick I started venturing around Low and Null. With threads like this... ...you should have kept your sweaty hand on the other stick and watched some p0rn. Auditing \| Collateral holding and insurance \| Consulting \| PLEX for Good Charity Twitter channel
Reicheck Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 3	Posted - 2012.05.11 18:06:00 - [26] - Quote As much as I want to mess with a cap, and eventually will... not in hisec. Abuse would be prolific. No sig here.
Antisocial Malkavian Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 85	Posted - 2012.05.11 20:57:00 - [27] - Quote Yeah thatd be amazing for the MASSIVE server destroying battle that would ensue. All the 0.0 alliance allying together caps jumping into high sec to gank EN MASSE ALL the miners at the same time, watching CONCORD try to kill titans and supercaps and the navy getting involved. It would all go down in beautiful firey destruction until the server crashed http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.2317/JKES0811.17.1 Bees That Drink Human Tears -- ITS SCIENCE!!!

CCP Phantom C C P C C P Alliance 1286	Posted - 2012.05.11 22:12:00 - [28] - Quote Moved from General Discussion. CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator

Adeena Torcfist Dark Underground Forces 27	Posted - 2012.05.12 01:38:00 - [29] - Quote Just dont allow modules to be activated, or drones/fighters to engage anything. At the very least, offensive modules that cant be activated. Nothing wrong with selling caps in high sec. Theyll eventually cyno out to be used in low/null. Cant do much with a cap if it cant engage squat. It would make hauling ships usefull at least for carriers, as that was what they were designed to do in the firrst place.
XXSketchxx Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 254	Posted - 2012.05.12 01:39:00 - [30] - Quote No.

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.