EVE Search - Adress book bug thats bugging the hell out of everyone!

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Adress book bug thats bugging the hell out of everyone!

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
DIVINE INQUISITOR	Posted - 2009.06.08 13:24:00 - [1] Dear Pilots I am sure that many of you have been noticing the adressbook bug in game thats been present for couple month in game.. Lot of you been sending petitions to ccp but the replies we getting is that 'we are working on it' or 'we dont know the cause of it but we are looking into it'. Not being stupid but how long will ccp be giving these excuses? Surely they must realise that adressbook bug is not only affecting the corp warfare but also their server side where pilots keep reloging into game just to make sure wartargets are online therefore puting more pressure on server! Lot of people are exploiting this bug so why dont ccp fix it? It seems that every time they release a patch there is a new bug present surely in such game as eve they be more focused on testing new patches before upseting 50000 people! By end of the day most of us subscribe therefore we also expect standards... Yeah well some of you will say if you not happy with it leave well that is not what I am looking to do I am just pointing out that ccp should adress the bug complains abit more efficiently and focus on testing patches more! Thats why there is test server... I would like to hear feedback on how other people feel about it... This bug mostly affects corps that do alot of wardecks... The only way around it is checking local or reloging... For those who are not aware of this bug let me break it down... Once you at war you tend to add your wartargets to your buddy list, now when someone logs on we know they online but when they go offline around 80% of time it wont show it will still say that pilot is online... Looking foward hearing your opinions...
Benco97 Gallente	Posted - 2009.06.08 13:31:00 - [2] Stop using the buddy list as an intel tool? I don't know, I'm just throwing that one out there... Originally by: P'uck You're a DUMBASS - bold italic underline at the VERY LEAST.
Pohbis Neo T.E.C.H.	Posted - 2009.06.08 13:37:00 - [3] They should make the Buddylist a 2-way thing. So in order to add someone, they have to accept it. No more buddy list spying. We already have the "auto-accept convo if person is in my buddy-list"-option, so CCP knows how to do it. Make it happen.
Amerilia	Posted - 2009.06.08 13:38:00 - [4] Originally by: DIVINE INQUISITOR Dear Pilots I am sure that many of you have been noticing the adressbook bug in game thats been present for couple month in game.. Lot of you been sending petitions to ccp but the replies we getting is that 'we are working on it' or 'we dont know the cause of it but we are looking into it'. Not being stupid but how long will ccp be giving these excuses? Surely they must realise that adressbook bug is not only affecting the corp warfare but also their server side where pilots keep reloging into game just to make sure wartargets are online therefore puting more pressure on server! Lot of people are exploiting this bug so why dont ccp fix it? It seems that every time they release a patch there is a new bug present surely in such game as eve they be more focused on testing new patches before upseting 50000 people! By end of the day most of us subscribe therefore we also expect standards... Yeah well some of you will say if you not happy with it leave well that is not what I am looking to do I am just pointing out that ccp should adress the bug complains abit more efficiently and focus on testing patches more! Thats why there is test server... I would like to hear feedback on how other people feel about it... This bug mostly affects corps that do alot of wardecks... The only way around it is checking local or reloging... For those who are not aware of this bug let me break it down... Once you at war you tend to add your wartargets to your buddy list, now when someone logs on we know they online but when they go offline around 80% of time it wont show it will still say that pilot is online... Looking foward hearing your opinions... Dont wardec people for the time beeing?
Amerilia	Posted - 2009.06.08 13:39:00 - [5] Originally by: Pohbis They should make the Buddylist a 2-way thing. So in order to add someone, they have to accept it. No more buddy list spying. We already have the "auto-accept convo if person is in my buddy-list"-option, so CCP knows how to do it. Make it happen. Signed
Benco97 Gallente	Posted - 2009.06.08 13:43:00 - [6] Originally by: Pohbis They should make the Buddylist a 2-way thing. So in order to add someone, they have to accept it. I absolutely agree. Originally by: P'uck You're a DUMBASS - bold italic underline at the VERY LEAST.
Ironnight Caldari x13 KrautbreaK	Posted - 2009.06.08 13:51:00 - [7] Way down on the list and the bug list for eve-o is freaking long. They're like 'oh **** son, its a trap Doomsday
Jack Dant Minmatar The Gentlemen of Low Moral Fibre	Posted - 2009.06.08 13:53:00 - [8] Originally by: DIVINE INQUISITOR I am sure that many of you have been noticing the adressbook bug in game thats been present for couple month in game.. It's been this way for as long as I've been in game (nearly a year now), and according to some corpmates, the bug dates back to day 1 of the buddy list. Would be nice if it got fixed, but tbh, you just need to adapt to it. I just double check targets by removing and re-adding them to the buddy list before I go after them. Intel goes both ways anyway. The buddy list is even more useful to the defender than to the attacker.
Cory Sopapilla Minmatar	Posted - 2009.06.08 15:42:00 - [9] Originally by: Amerilia Originally by: Pohbis They should make the Buddylist a 2-way thing. So in order to add someone, they have to accept it. No more buddy list spying. We already have the "auto-accept convo if person is in my buddy-list"-option, so CCP knows how to do it. Make it happen. Signed /seconded as long as we make local like WH local as well.
KaarBaak Minmatar Squirrel Team	Posted - 2009.06.08 16:10:00 - [10] Originally by: Pohbis They should make the Buddylist a 2-way thing. So in order to add someone, they have to accept it. No more buddy list spying. We already have the "auto-accept convo if person is in my buddy-list"-option, so CCP knows how to do it. Make it happen. /vote
DIVINE INQUISITOR	Posted - 2009.06.08 16:16:00 - [11] Originally by: Pohbis They should make the Buddylist a 2-way thing. So in order to add someone, they have to accept it. No more buddy list spying. We already have the "auto-accept convo if person is in my buddy-list"-option, so CCP knows how to do it. Make it happen. Hmm its not a bad idea but not practical one! Have you considered how more sophisticated the wardec will be? we would need to have a special dedicated spies to actual keep track of enemy..Who would volontere for that?! sitting and jumping through sytems just to find somone online? Ofcourse you can run locater agent but then again its not practical if you fighting 30 and up member group! It would not work because you it would be way too time consuming and inacurate...
DJ Obsidian New Eden Technical Institutes	Posted - 2009.06.08 16:17:00 - [12] whine whine complain complain. -5 for the post of you need to learn to adapt to EvE, and -10 more points cause your name is in caps and you are probably an alt. you know relogging fixes this or better yet, ask someone else who has similar friends/intel list and ask them before going out looking for them. gasp
Amerilia	Posted - 2009.06.08 16:17:00 - [13] Originally by: DIVINE INQUISITOR Originally by: Pohbis They should make the Buddylist a 2-way thing. So in order to add someone, they have to accept it. No more buddy list spying. We already have the "auto-accept convo if person is in my buddy-list"-option, so CCP knows how to do it. Make it happen. Hmm its not a bad idea but not practical one! Have you considered how more sophisticated the wardec will be? we would need to have a special dedicated spies to actual keep track of enemy..Who would volontere for that?! sitting and jumping through sytems just to find somone online? Ofcourse you can run locater agent but then again its not practical if you fighting 30 and up member group! It would not work because you it would be way too time consuming and inacurate... Which is the idea behind it, youd have to actually do something for your easy kills.
DIVINE INQUISITOR	Posted - 2009.06.08 16:19:00 - [14] Originally by: DJ Obsidian whine whine complain complain. -5 for the post of you need to learn to adapt to EvE, and -10 more points cause your name is in caps and you are probably an alt. you know relogging fixes this or better yet, ask someone else who has similar friends/intel list and ask them before going out looking for them. gasp Yeah if people like me would not complain you would still be crashing when jumping through gates! And no this aint Alt smartass...
DIVINE INQUISITOR	Posted - 2009.06.08 16:21:00 - [15] Edited by: DIVINE INQUISITOR on 08/06/2009 16:23:07 Edited by: DIVINE INQUISITOR on 08/06/2009 16:22:04 Originally by: Amerilia Originally by: DIVINE INQUISITOR Originally by: Pohbis They should make the Buddylist a 2-way thing. So in order to add someone, they have to accept it. No more buddy list spying. We already have the "auto-accept convo if person is in my buddy-list"-option, so CCP knows how to do it. Make it happen. Which is the idea behind it, youd have to actually do something for your easy kills. Indeed I agree you do get out and search for your enemy but you do it if they online otherwise you not just waisting your time by assembling fleets and searching for people that offline but also waisting time of other people!
Amerilia	Posted - 2009.06.08 16:23:00 - [16] Edited by: Amerilia on 08/06/2009 16:24:22 Please quote me correctly next time, it looks like you quote me but those are your words O.o
Xianbei	Posted - 2009.06.08 17:14:00 - [17] Originally by: Pohbis They should make the Buddylist a 2-way thing. So in order to add someone, they have to accept it. No more buddy list spying. We already have the "auto-accept convo if person is in my buddy-list"-option, so CCP knows how to do it. Make it happen. this
Ryhss Caldari Gallus Eternus Ministry of Silly Walks	Posted - 2009.06.08 17:59:00 - [18] Edited by: Ryhss on 08/06/2009 18:00:18 Edited by: Ryhss on 08/06/2009 17:59:38 Originally by: DIVINE INQUISITOR Dear Pilots I am sure that many of you have been noticing the adressbook bug in game thats been present for couple month in game.. Lot of you been sending petitions to ccp but the replies we getting is that 'we are working on it' or 'we dont know the cause of it but we are looking into it'. Not being stupid but how long will ccp be giving these excuses? Surely they must realise that adressbook bug is not only affecting the corp warfare but also their server side where pilots keep reloging into game just to make sure wartargets are online therefore puting more pressure on server! Lot of people are exploiting this bug so why dont ccp fix it? It seems that every time they release a patch there is a new bug present surely in such game as eve they be more focused on testing new patches before upseting 50000 people! By end of the day most of us subscribe therefore we also expect standards... Yeah well some of you will say if you not happy with it leave well that is not what I am looking to do I am just pointing out that ccp should adress the bug complains abit more efficiently and focus on testing patches more! Thats why there is test server... I would like to hear feedback on how other people feel about it... This bug mostly affects corps that do alot of wardecks... The only way around it is checking local or reloging... For those who are not aware of this bug let me break it down... Once you at war you tend to add your wartargets to your buddy list, now when someone logs on we know they online but when they go offline around 80% of time it wont show it will still say that pilot is online... Looking foward hearing your opinions... You know what bugs me? People who can't spell addressbook.
EnslaverOfMinmatar Amarr Viziam	Posted - 2009.06.08 18:36:00 - [19] Just relog periodically.
Ranger 1 Amarr Dynaverse Corporation Vertigo Coalition	Posted - 2009.06.08 18:45:00 - [20] Quote: we would need to have a special dedicated spies to actualy keep track of enemy..Who would volontere for that?! The word, and concept, you are looking for is "scout".
Discrodia Gallente Blood Red Dawn	Posted - 2009.06.08 19:16:00 - [21] Edited by: Discrodia on 08/06/2009 19:16:30 Originally by: Benco97 Stop using the buddy list as an intel tool? I don't know, I'm just throwing that one out there... This. And there are more important things, like the fact I can't spin my ship in station no matter what I do
Sniper Wolf18 Gallente A Pretty Pony Princess General Tso's Alliance	Posted - 2009.06.08 19:34:00 - [22] Originally by: DIVINE INQUISITOR Edited by: DIVINE INQUISITOR on 08/06/2009 16:17:19 Originally by: Pohbis They should make the Buddylist a 2-way thing. So in order to add someone, they have to accept it. No more buddy list spying. We already have the "auto-accept convo if person is in my buddy-list"-option, so CCP knows how to do it. Make it happen. Hmm its not a bad idea but not practical one! Have you considered how more sophisticated the wardec will be? we would need to have a special dedicated spies to actualy keep track of enemy..Who would volontere for that?! sitting and jumping through sytems just to find somone online? Ofcourse you can run locater agent but then again its not practical if you fighting 30 and up member group! It would not work because it would be way too time consuming and inacurate... Maybe people would just learn to grow a pair instead of "ohnoes theres 4 online and only 6 of us, what on earth shall we do!!!!111111one"
Armoured C Gallente Federation of Freedom Fighters Aggression.	Posted - 2009.06.08 23:59:00 - [23] what bug are you on about ?
Enraku Reynolt Minmatar Mid Knights Wildly Inappropriate.	Posted - 2009.06.09 01:55:00 - [24] Originally by: Armoured C what bug are you on about ? ladybugs, op is terrified of them ------------------------------------------------ Do not let the world change you. Change the world Here's everything I know about war: somebody wins, somebody loses, and nothing is ever the same
Mark Interiis Gallente Disorder.	Posted - 2009.06.09 02:55:00 - [25] Originally by: Benco97 Stop using the buddy list as an intel tool? I don't know, I'm just throwing that one out there... This would only make people use the notepad instead.
Khemul Zula Amarr Keisen Trade League	Posted - 2009.06.09 05:07:00 - [26] Originally by: Enraku Reynolt Originally by: Armoured C what bug are you on about ? ladybugs, op is terrified of them Can't blame him. Sure they look cute and harmless from far away, but have you ever looked really closely at one? Very creepy bastards, and that's not even taking into account the evil. <Insert sig here>
Benco97 Gallente	Posted - 2009.06.09 10:55:00 - [27] Originally by: Mark Interiis Bad intel is better than no intel. Removing the "see if online" aspect would just make people use the notepad instead. What I actually meant is that I sincerely doubt that the buddy list was designed as a tool to collect info on your enemies and should stop being used in this way. Originally by: P'uck You're a DUMBASS - bold italic underline at the VERY LEAST.
Spurty Caldari Ore Mongers BricK sQuAD.	Posted - 2009.06.09 11:04:00 - [28] and people complain about 'LOCAL'? sesh .. Originally by: Cat o'Ninetails hi cat here i was thinking earlier about corpses...
Beleti Ninhursag Butcher the weak	Posted - 2009.06.09 13:13:00 - [29] present in game for a couple of months ???? dude ur serious ...? its in game aslong as i play it. get used to it, its not a bug, its a feature! Originally by: Dao Rheng I'm going to be flying a megathron, but I'm still pretty new to it. I haven't been doing as much damage as I'd like to. Fitting: High slots - 6x 720mm Howitzer Artillery Cannons
ShadowMaiden Amarr Viziam	Posted - 2009.06.09 14:11:00 - [30] The CSM could probably raise this with CCP if you asked them, provided it would serve their [the CSM] own interests and self-agenda peddling.

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.