EVE Search - poll should asteroid belts be removed from high sec?

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

poll should asteroid belts be removed from high sec?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
MeBiatch Republic University Minmatar Republic 333	Posted - 2012.05.15 19:54:00 - [1] - Quote IMO the answer is yes... remove asteroid belts and replace them with mining missions... that way if you are a high sec miner you have the safty of having to be probed before you are suicded ganked... PLEX FOR PIZZA! TECH iii MINNING SHIPS!
Sister Rhode Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation 63	Posted - 2012.05.15 19:55:00 - [2] - Quote Yes, not to be replaced by mining missions, but scannable grav anomalies. The type that you can get a 100% hit on just with your ship scanner.
stoicfaux 1063	Posted - 2012.05.15 19:55:00 - [3] - Quote MeBiatch wrote: that way if you are a high sec miner you have the safty of having to be probed before you are suicded ganked... Fore-probing before being probed fatally? You can tell me what is and isn't Truth when you pry the tinfoil from my cold, lifeless head.
Fractals 4Lyfe GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 80	Posted - 2012.05.15 20:03:00 - [4] - Quote I approve of this because pubbies will think "oh i'm totally safe now" and be even more unaware than they are now.
Alavaria Fera GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 734	Posted - 2012.05.15 20:05:00 - [5] - Quote Mining anoms .... interesting idea. Sister Rhode wrote: Yes, not to be replaced by mining missions, but scannable grav anomalies. The type that you can get a 100% hit on just with your ship scanner. If they respawned over and over then there would be an interesting amount of stackability in systems. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd
Greyscale Dash Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 10	Posted - 2012.05.15 20:06:00 - [6] - Quote Yes! Yes! Yes! Make EVE hard again!
Saia Tae Arragosa Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic 228	Posted - 2012.05.15 20:12:00 - [7] - Quote I am not for removing mining from high sec - ever. Can CCP remove fixed asteroid belts and go to randomly generated ones that people have to probe or scan for - sure. I'd prefer the ones that you actually have to probe for...myself. Just hitting something like dscan is lame and changes nothing.
Just Alter Enlightened Industries Test Alliance Please Ignore 123	Posted - 2012.05.15 20:16:00 - [8] - Quote MeBiatch wrote: IMO the answer is yes... remove asteroid belts and replace them with mining missions... that way if you are a high sec miner you have the safty of having to be probed before you are suicded ganked... I'd love to know how many high sec miners even know what the dscan is...
MeBiatch Republic University Minmatar Republic 333	Posted - 2012.05.15 20:17:00 - [9] - Quote Sister Rhode wrote: Yes, not to be replaced by mining missions, but scannable grav anomalies. The type that you can get a 100% hit on just with your ship scanner. yeah but then me the ganker can do the same and just warp to you? having a mission at the least makes it so i have to scan you out... PLEX FOR PIZZA! TECH iii MINNING SHIPS!
Karn Dulake Souls Must Be Trampled The.Alliance 691	Posted - 2012.05.15 20:18:00 - [10] - Quote Alts should be removed from the forums I dont normally troll, but when i do i do it on General Discussion.

Sister Rhode Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation 64	Posted - 2012.05.15 20:19:00 - [11] - Quote MeBiatch wrote: Sister Rhode wrote: Yes, not to be replaced by mining missions, but scannable grav anomalies. The type that you can get a 100% hit on just with your ship scanner. yeah but then me the ganker can do the same and just warp to you? having a mission at the least makes it so i have to scan you out... I'm not suggesting the change to make life easier for gank targets.
Karl Hobb Imperial Margarine 208	Posted - 2012.05.15 20:22:00 - [12] - Quote MeBiatch wrote: remove asteroid belts and replace them with mining missions... that way if you are a high sec miner you have the safty of having to be probed before you are suicded ganked... Why not, you know, just do the mining missions that exist now? +1 in local
Romar Agent Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 20	Posted - 2012.05.15 20:22:00 - [13] - Quote I raise you a "Highsec should be removed from the game". Or should I just go with "Players should be kicked out of Highsec". Oh, oh, "Players should have to pay for every day in Highsec". ("in PLEX")
MeBiatch Republic University Minmatar Republic 333	Posted - 2012.05.15 20:32:00 - [14] - Quote Sister Rhode wrote: MeBiatch wrote: Sister Rhode wrote: Yes, not to be replaced by mining missions, but scannable grav anomalies. The type that you can get a 100% hit on just with your ship scanner. yeah but then me the ganker can do the same and just warp to you? having a mission at the least makes it so i have to scan you out... I'm not suggesting the change to make life easier for gank targets. why not? think of it like fishing... plus alot of high sec miners are noobish so they should have a "fighting" chance.... PLEX FOR PIZZA! TECH iii MINNING SHIPS!
Nlex Domini Canium 5	Posted - 2012.05.15 20:33:00 - [15] - Quote Why stop at highsec? Make all asteroid/ice fields a moving entity. Add some comets to mine for ice/minerals. Make moon minerals exhaustible, so that people would have to probe out new deposits and not sit on one moon forever. Make those deposits differ in maximum capacity and maximum extraction, with inverse law governing the connection between two. Make all areas of mining more dynamic than they are now.
Bootleg Jack Potters Field 78	Posted - 2012.05.15 20:34:00 - [16] - Quote What a stupid idea. I'm an American, English is my second language...
MeBiatch Republic University Minmatar Republic 333	Posted - 2012.05.15 20:36:00 - [17] - Quote Nlex wrote: Why stop at highsec? Make all asteroid/ice fields a moving entity. Add some comets to mine for ice/minerals. Make moon minerals exhaustible, so that people would have to probe out new deposits and not sit on one moon forever. Make those deposits differ in maximum capacity and maximum extraction, with inverse law governing the connection between two. Make all areas of mining more dynamic than they are now. i like this idea soo much i am adding it to the op PLEX FOR PIZZA! TECH iii MINNING SHIPS!
Ocih Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums 198	Posted - 2012.05.15 20:38:00 - [18] - Quote They have mining missions. The Ore is fake. The LP buys you combat ships The ISK sucks.


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.