EVE Search - Two Armageddon Setups

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Two Armageddon Setups

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Taasha Amarr Imperial Academy	Posted - 2009.06.16 20:46:00 - [1] I'm having trouble deciding which one I like better, I use both regularly. The DHP setup seems to just last longer (obviously) in a fight but I feel gimped on dps. 1. Mega Pulse Laser II [Scorch, AN M] Mega Pulse Laser II [Scorch, AN M] Mega Pulse Laser II [Scorch, AN M] Mega Pulse Laser II [Scorch, AN M] Mega Pulse Laser II [Scorch, AN M] Mega Pulse Laser II [Scorch, AN M] Mega Pulse Laser II [Scorch, AN M] Medium Energy Neutralizer II Quad-Lif Fueled I Booster Rockets Sensor Booster II Medium Cap Booster II [800] Damage Control II Adaptive Nano Plating II Adaptive Nano Plating II Heatsink II Heatsink II Heatsink II 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I Trimark Armor Pump I Trimark Armor Pump I Trimark Armor Pump I 5x Ogre II 2. Dual Heavy Pulse Laser II [Scorch, AN M] Dual Heavy Pulse Laser II [Scorch, AN M] Dual Heavy Pulse Laser II [Scorch, AN M] Dual Heavy Pulse Laser II [Scorch, AN M] Dual Heavy Pulse Laser II [Scorch, AN M] Dual Heavy Pulse Laser II [Scorch, AN M] Dual Heavy Pulse Laser II [Scorch, AN M] Heavy Unstable Power Fluctuator I Quad-Lif Fueled I Booster Rockets Sensor Booster II Heavy Cap Booster II [800] Damage Control II Adaptive Nano Plating II Heatsink II Heatsink II Heatsink II 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I Trimark Armor Pump I Trimark Armor Pump I Trimark Armor Pump I 5x Ogre II I have Amarr battleship 5 and I hate active tanking Amarr ships, save for a very select few.
Anubis Xian Reavers	Posted - 2009.06.16 20:52:00 - [2] Both are viable, but the DHP is far more friendly if you are a newer player.
Neuronai	Posted - 2009.06.16 20:53:00 - [3] [Armageddon, ..] 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I Adaptive Nano Plating II Adaptive Nano Plating II Heat Sink II Heat Sink II Damage Control II Quad LiF Fueled I Booster Rockets Sensor Booster II, Scan Resolution Medium Capacitor Booster II, Cap Booster 800 Mega Pulse Laser II, Multifrequency L Mega Pulse Laser II, Multifrequency L Mega Pulse Laser II, Multifrequency L Mega Pulse Laser II, Multifrequency L Mega Pulse Laser II, Multifrequency L Mega Pulse Laser II, Multifrequency L Mega Pulse Laser II, Multifrequency L Medium Energy Neutralizer II [empty rig slot] [empty rig slot] [empty rig slot] Ogre II x5
battlebot1077 Off-Axis Response	Posted - 2009.06.16 20:54:00 - [4] id stick with setup #1. The amount of DPS youre doing will negate needing another plate. Less DPS just give the other dude more time to kill you :)
Terianna Eri Amarr Scrutari	Posted - 2009.06.17 00:26:00 - [5] I just discovered that an unrigged Abaddon has about as much EHP (if you fit 3x heat sink on both of them) as a trimarked Armageddon. Just thought I'd throw that out there. I like dropping 2x mega pulse laser down into DHPL (yeah, yeah, mixing guns) because then you free up the grid for a heavy neut and you still keep most of the DPS. Also the range difference isn't that considerable. Even better, the game handles the slots such that the 5x mega pulse lasers are on either side of the ship whereas the 2x dual heavy pulse are on the top and bottom, so it looks sweet. __________________________________ Originally by: CCP Whisper Boo hoo. Cry some more.
TimMc Gallente Extradition	Posted - 2009.06.17 00:32:00 - [6] Originally by: Terianna Eri I just discovered that an unrigged Abaddon has about as much EHP (if you fit 3x heat sink on both of them) as a trimarked Armageddon. Just thought I'd throw that out there. Less damage because no heavy drones and its much more expensive.
Deschenus Maximus Amarr Digital Fury Corporation Minor Threat.	Posted - 2009.06.17 04:38:00 - [7] Originally by: TimMc and its much more expensive. Assuming you go for cheap rigs on the Abby, only the initial investment will be more expensive compared to a trimarked Geddon.
Taasha Amarr Imperial Academy	Posted - 2009.06.17 09:13:00 - [8] Edited by: Taasha on 17/06/2009 09:13:36 I use the Abaddon but prefer to use it's advantage by having an active tank with no damage mods. Mostly for low sec, in other words, otherwise I find the 'Geddon can do it better for cheaper.
Vrabac Zawa's Fan Club	Posted - 2009.06.17 09:38:00 - [9] Edited by: Vrabac on 17/06/2009 09:38:25 Originally by: Taasha Edited by: Taasha on 17/06/2009 09:13:36 I use the Abaddon but prefer to use it's advantage by having an active tank with no damage mods. Mostly for low sec, in other words, otherwise I find the 'Geddon can do it better for cheaper. Geddon pretty much loses it's point if you don't go for full gank, so mega pulses + 3 HS + sentry drones imo. Abaddon is a far better ship once you start doing compromises, dropping heatsinks for eanms etc. Also, dhp do far less dps than mega pulses, I really don't like them. On a side note active tank on abaddon? The resist bonus actually works perfectly for the buffer tank. Having a rep on top isn't a bad idea, but going for a real active tank is.
Dreadmuppet Four	Posted - 2009.06.17 11:29:00 - [10] This looks quite nice, you loose one HS but gain a remote LAR and 2 cap boosters for stable cap even with it running [Armageddon, ..] 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I Adaptive Nano Plating II Adaptive Nano Plating II Heat Sink II Heat Sink II Damage Control II Quad LiF Fueled I Booster Rockets Medium Electrochemical Capacitor Booster I, Cap Booster 800 Medium Electrochemical Capacitor Booster I, Cap Booster 800 Mega Pulse Laser II, Scorch L Mega Pulse Laser II, Scorch L Mega Pulse Laser II, Scorch L Mega Pulse Laser II, Scorch L Mega Pulse Laser II, Scorch L Mega Pulse Laser II, Scorch L Mega Pulse Laser II, Scorch L Large 'Solace' I Remote Bulwark Reconstruction [empty rig slot] [empty rig slot] [empty rig slot] Garde II x5
Recluse XXX Lightsbane Corp	Posted - 2009.06.17 11:45:00 - [11] I find the lack of a warp distruptor on any of these setups disturbing. But perhaps you will use the ship in a gang and have a dedicated tackler...
Taasha Amarr Imperial Academy	Posted - 2009.06.18 10:26:00 - [12] Soloing in a battleship these days is only for those with balls of steel and money to burn. Hence lack of disruptor, if you're in a gang and the battleship is tackling, you are doing it wrong.
Riho Gallente Mercenary Forces	Posted - 2009.06.18 11:44:00 - [13] i prefer geddon in smaller gang fights where my ogres have time to go to the target (cant use t2 sentries YET) and abbaddon where i just need pure gun power to rip stuff apart :) megapulse + scorch... hay was that a recon that blew up ?? :P
Neuronai	Posted - 2009.06.18 17:45:00 - [14] Originally by: Recluse XXX I find the lack of a warp distruptor on any of these setups disturbing. But perhaps you will use the ship in a gang and have a dedicated tackler... Not having a point on a 3 med slot battleship is forgivable.

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.