EVE Search - Save the Navitas

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Save the Navitas

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Azaraius Dream shooters M 3 R C I L 3 S S 0	Posted - 2012.05.19 01:38:00 - [1] - Quote Ive recently read that there will be changes to the frigates for the Inferno Expansion (and afterward). Now while I agree that this is a pretty good idea to redefine how some frigates work and what not, I feel I must fiannaly make my ideas heard. I have always hated how the Imicus and its sister the Helieos look. Being Gallente, these ships should look beautiful by nature. I propose to CCP that they switch the roles of the Navitas and the Imicus. The Navitas is beautiful. It looks fast. and if you ask me It even looks like a ship used for exporation. That bulky compartment on the side even looks like it should be the drone bay/ or cargo hold. What true gallente pilot can disagree that the navitas deserves this role. On the other hand the imicus looks more like a support ship. What ever the plan is for the Navitas please, PLEASE reassign that project to the imicus (and her sister); and let us have our Navitas exploration / scout ship. If you agree with this post please bump and comment. If you disagree please explain why.
Cpt Fenrir Mercs of Vengeance M 3 R C I L 3 S S 2	Posted - 2012.05.19 08:34:00 - [2] - Quote I definitly agree with this idea. The Navitas is RAD!! Fist BUMP
Xhaiden Ora University of Caille Gallente Federation 17	Posted - 2012.05.19 08:49:00 - [3] - Quote Azaraius wrote: Being Gallente, these ships should look beautiful by nature. Okay now you've lost me. -.- Though I do agree that the Space Trout looks better than the Imicus. The Imicus looks like it had a tragic birth defect surgically removed and is still in physiotherapy.
Leeloo Alizee Orion Constellation Inc. 0	Posted - 2012.05.19 08:53:00 - [4] - Quote True that, imicus and helios REALY looks like some ******** ships. I wish they are only ones. Dominix, Hyperion even Incursus looks like idiot with that spear. Art and science (fiction) dont mix together
Plaude Pollard Aliastra Gallente Federation 22	Posted - 2012.05.19 09:07:00 - [5] - Quote Agreed. The Navitas looks more suited for the Imicus' job, while the Imicus doesn't look like its designed for anything but cannon-fodder.
Karsten LoneWolf Mining Veni Vidi Vici Alliance 0	Posted - 2012.05.19 09:15:00 - [6] - Quote You made good points!
Xhaiden Ora University of Caille Gallente Federation 17	Posted - 2012.05.19 09:30:00 - [7] - Quote Many of the game's ship designs are....alarmingly impractical to say the least. Gallente can at least build some ships that are reasonably symmetrical though.
Linna Excel Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 5	Posted - 2012.05.19 14:02:00 - [8] - Quote Azaraius wrote: I propose to CCP that they switch the roles of the Navitas and the Imicus. The Navitas is beautiful. It looks fast. and if you ask me It even looks like a ship used for exporation. That bulky compartment on the side even looks like it should be the drone bay/ or cargo hold. What true gallente pilot can disagree that the navitas deserves this role. Agreed, the imicus is ugly. Maybe the best thing is to redesign it from the ground up. Part of me wants to say turn the navitas into a tiny combat drone boat and add a new mining vessel or let the imicus do double duty as exploration and mining. I <3 Vexors.
Farmer McNibbles Wooden Raft Industries 0	Posted - 2012.05.19 16:45:00 - [9] - Quote Yea.. The Navitas is "rad" And I can't sell a single damn one of them! (No, actually I only sold one.. so, I could sell one, and even for being the lowest in the region I'm in with the busiest constellation at that! meh..)
Linna Excel Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 5	Posted - 2012.05.19 22:18:00 - [10] - Quote Most players get a navi doing the career tuts and as long as you stick to highsec your chances of losing them are pretty low. There are also better miners that don't take that long to get into. I <3 Vexors.
Christopher AET Segmentum Solar Intrepid Crossing 89	Posted - 2012.05.20 01:09:00 - [11] - Quote Imicus looks like a banana with a kickstand. I speak only for myself and my corp. My views are not representative of my alliance.
Ohanka The Lone Patrol Tactical Narcotics Team 42	Posted - 2012.05.21 12:36:00 - [12] - Quote Redesign the hidious imicus
Azaraius Dream shooters 6	Posted - 2012.05.25 00:19:00 - [13] - Quote bump, keep those ideas and comments coming.
Cari Cullejen Thukker Tribe Holdings Inc. Can't Undock. Won't Undock 3	Posted - 2012.05.25 05:07:00 - [14] - Quote I am gallente and i approve of this message +1 In love with CCP Sunset,-á+ëg velti ++v+¡ hvernig ++a+¦ er +í-á+ìslandi
Omnathious Deninard M'Tar Logistics Division Night Sky Alliance 25	Posted - 2012.05.25 05:43:00 - [15] - Quote If I recall correctly the navitas will be turned in to a drone boat when it gets tieracide
Azaraius Dream shooters 8	Posted - 2012.05.27 06:14:00 - [16] - Quote Omnathious Deninard wrote: If I recall correctly the navitas will be turned in to a drone boat when it gets tieracide Really? That would be... okay-ish I guess... Link?
Azaraius The Lirsautton Cooperative 9	Posted - 2012.05.28 14:59:00 - [17] - Quote Daily bump, please comment and like.
sabre906 Old Spice Syndicate Sailors of the Sacred Spice 91	Posted - 2012.05.28 15:23:00 - [18] - Quote The only reason our hardworking devs gave us new sb models is because torp launchers won't fit on the old ones. Navitas will probably have to suffer a while longer... Standings Improvement Service https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=19454
Callic Veratar Power of the Phoenix 238	Posted - 2012.05.28 17:08:00 - [19] - Quote Having it as a dedicated drone boat would be SO much cooler: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1182520#post1182520 ATTACK FRIGATES: in general faster than the other frigates, with good damage, suited for interception or just damage dealing, but less resilient than combat frigates. Includes the Executioner (turret ship), Bantam (turret ship), Atron (turret ship), Navitas (dedicated drone ship), Slasher (turret ship) and Burst (TBD, possibly drone ship if role doesn't conflict with Navitas)
Operation Stink-eye Ministry of War Amarr Empire 1	Posted - 2012.05.28 21:13:00 - [20] - Quote Switch the models CCP! Switch them now! Navitas is awesome.
Oregin Red Federation RvB - RED Federation 21	Posted - 2012.05.28 21:25:00 - [21] - Quote I agree, imicus model is totally awful. Then again, I don't think I'll ever adjust to flying a Navitas...that ship has far too many negative connotations being associated with mining and all... :p
Barbara Nichole Cryogenic Consultancy Black Sun Alliance 163	Posted - 2012.05.28 22:04:00 - [22] - Quote Though my husband disagrees, the Amarr ships are all uniformly beautiful. You could train those instead. [IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/OldST.jpg[/IMG]
Azaraius The Lirsautton Cooperative 9	Posted - 2012.05.29 07:24:00 - [23] - Quote Awesome guys, Love seeing those comments and ideas. Keep'em coming.
briannt Kador Systems TriMark Alliance 0	Posted - 2012.05.29 08:57:00 - [24] - Quote i think its a great idea and hope ccp does to
Kaelie Onren Pyrrhus Industries 16	Posted - 2012.05.29 11:49:00 - [25] - Quote You think that's ugly? Let's talk Kitsune! But yeah imicus looks like somebody screwed up the blueprint or ran out of materials halfway through construction.
Azaraius The Lirsautton Cooperative 10	Posted - 2012.05.30 08:58:00 - [26] - Quote Kaelie Onren wrote: You think that's ugly? Let's talk Kitsune! But yeah imicus looks like somebody screwed up the blueprint or ran out of materials halfway through construction. You are forgetting the Caldari Dont care how ships look so long as they work ... This is not the case with the Gallente, beauty is thought up WITH the design.
Kaelie Onren Nyan Cat Logistics PNG Associates 18	Posted - 2012.06.06 14:37:00 - [27] - Quote Azaraius wrote: Kaelie Onren wrote: You think that's ugly? Let's talk Kitsune! But yeah imicus looks like somebody screwed up the blueprint or ran out of materials halfway through construction. You are forgetting the Caldari Dont care how ships look so long as they work ... This is not the case with the Gallente, beauty is thought up WITH the design. You are right, I totally forgot that! :-P Wait, you sure you didn't mean Minmatar? Anyway, if you really want to play the 'function' card, then I would really like to hear the explanation of the function of the goose head on the Moa, the dangle head of the Griffin, or how 'functional' is having a lobsided non-symmetrical hull design to start with. Maybe you just don't appreciate the banana and kickstand awesomeness. I mean, you probably also think that Rothko is just a bunch of coloured squares. :P At any rate, although they may change the banana model, they won't swap them as you suggested, would cause too much confusion.
Reaver Glitterstim Dromedaworks inc 128	Posted - 2012.06.06 15:03:00 - [28] - Quote I'm a little sad that CCP is turning the mining frigates into combat frigates. Maybe the scan probe and mining frigates could be made into one, with 3 high slots and 2 turret hardpoints. Noobs want their carebearing ship. -á"The Mittani: Hated By Badposters i'm strangely comfortable with it" -Mittens

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.