| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

missedme
|
Posted - 2004.09.21 18:53:00 -
[61]
Originally by: Excavation Svcs Goodness! Say no to Yulai gate ganking with alts, say no to Tundragon with alts!
Heh an alt against alts imagine that 
|

missedme
|
Posted - 2004.09.21 18:53:00 -
[62]
Originally by: Excavation Svcs Goodness! Say no to Yulai gate ganking with alts, say no to Tundragon with alts!
Heh an alt against alts imagine that 
|

MadGaz
|
Posted - 2004.09.21 19:40:00 -
[63]
Signed :D Just as another idea, could make it so you can only make so many alts in a time frame, like 1 alt per month. ------------------------------------------
|

MadGaz
|
Posted - 2004.09.21 19:40:00 -
[64]
Signed :D Just as another idea, could make it so you can only make so many alts in a time frame, like 1 alt per month. ------------------------------------------
|

Aitrus
|
Posted - 2004.09.21 21:38:00 -
[65]
Originally by: Jozef Meurtrier
Originally by: hired goon One character per account. Everybody wins.
I vote for this one. If Oveur is getting rid of safespots, lets go all the way and get rid of alts aswell.Sure people would be ****ed off about it for a while, and with every change there is always some drama queen who shouts "OMFG I QUIT!"
Okay, and for those of us who have more than one character on an account for legitimate purposes, and have dedicated training time to them?
Losing a 4mil SP character just cause people abuse alts is unacceptable.
|

Aitrus
|
Posted - 2004.09.21 21:38:00 -
[66]
Originally by: Jozef Meurtrier
Originally by: hired goon One character per account. Everybody wins.
I vote for this one. If Oveur is getting rid of safespots, lets go all the way and get rid of alts aswell.Sure people would be ****ed off about it for a while, and with every change there is always some drama queen who shouts "OMFG I QUIT!"
Okay, and for those of us who have more than one character on an account for legitimate purposes, and have dedicated training time to them?
Losing a 4mil SP character just cause people abuse alts is unacceptable.
|

Brobro
|
Posted - 2004.09.21 22:14:00 -
[67]
bah, Ephemeron I hate you. Your idea makes sense...
ah well I sign my name. its a good idea, I wish it would have been mine. 
|

Brobro
|
Posted - 2004.09.21 22:14:00 -
[68]
bah, Ephemeron I hate you. Your idea makes sense...
ah well I sign my name. its a good idea, I wish it would have been mine. 
|

ProphetGuru
|
Posted - 2004.09.21 22:26:00 -
[69]
Yeah I mean, instead of taking care of the PROBLEM, alt gankers in empire, let's screw everyone in the game and take their alts away, even tho they have put considerable training time into them.
Is my subscription price gonna be cut by 1/3rd?
Bad idea. An idea the devs have stated matter of fact that they will not entertain for months and months.
Evolution..... Just when you thought you were winning.
|

ProphetGuru
|
Posted - 2004.09.21 22:26:00 -
[70]
Yeah I mean, instead of taking care of the PROBLEM, alt gankers in empire, let's screw everyone in the game and take their alts away, even tho they have put considerable training time into them.
Is my subscription price gonna be cut by 1/3rd?
Bad idea. An idea the devs have stated matter of fact that they will not entertain for months and months.
Evolution..... Just when you thought you were winning.
|

Danton Marcellus
|
Posted - 2004.09.21 23:58:00 -
[71]
Edited by: Danton Marcellus on 22/09/2004 00:01:21 Read before posting.
No-one said anything about taking alts away, the idea was for it to be an investment. The ability to delete it over and over to create more scammer and orelifter alts than anyone care to remember and keep track of would be minimized, as the timer for deleting an alt would be set to a longer and longer processing time.
Convert Stations
|

Danton Marcellus
|
Posted - 2004.09.21 23:58:00 -
[72]
Edited by: Danton Marcellus on 22/09/2004 00:01:21 Read before posting.
No-one said anything about taking alts away, the idea was for it to be an investment. The ability to delete it over and over to create more scammer and orelifter alts than anyone care to remember and keep track of would be minimized, as the timer for deleting an alt would be set to a longer and longer processing time.
Convert Stations
|

MrBinary
|
Posted - 2004.09.22 02:43:00 -
[73]
Originally by: Ephemeron The people who abuse alts usually end up alt farming - the create one, use him, delete him, create another one. It takes a while to delete an alt, I dunno how many hows exactly since I never bothered with thm.
Here's the trick - for every time you delete an alt, it would take TWICE as long to delete him next time. After a few deleted alts, people would stop, cause it would take forever to delete.
How about it?
Simple and effective.
Signed, MrBinary
"[ 2004.05.20 20:11:42 ] Hodal Xibur > Die MrBinary" |

MrBinary
|
Posted - 2004.09.22 02:43:00 -
[74]
Originally by: Ephemeron The people who abuse alts usually end up alt farming - the create one, use him, delete him, create another one. It takes a while to delete an alt, I dunno how many hows exactly since I never bothered with thm.
Here's the trick - for every time you delete an alt, it would take TWICE as long to delete him next time. After a few deleted alts, people would stop, cause it would take forever to delete.
How about it?
Simple and effective.
Signed, MrBinary
"[ 2004.05.20 20:11:42 ] Hodal Xibur > Die MrBinary" |

Finderne
|
Posted - 2004.09.22 03:12:00 -
[75]
I think it's a good idea, but the people making mischief with alts will get around it pretty easily without other changes to how CCP handles new accts. CCP would need to put in something like a respectable setup charge on new accts or ppl would just cancel a 2nd acct and start a new one if creating new alts on an existing acct got to be a hassle.
|

Finderne
|
Posted - 2004.09.22 03:12:00 -
[76]
I think it's a good idea, but the people making mischief with alts will get around it pretty easily without other changes to how CCP handles new accts. CCP would need to put in something like a respectable setup charge on new accts or ppl would just cancel a 2nd acct and start a new one if creating new alts on an existing acct got to be a hassle.
|

Astinius
|
Posted - 2004.09.22 04:06:00 -
[77]
*Signed*
|

Astinius
|
Posted - 2004.09.22 04:06:00 -
[78]
*Signed*
|

Brunis
|
Posted - 2004.09.22 06:24:00 -
[79]
Originally by: Aitrus
Originally by: Jozef Meurtrier
Originally by: hired goon One character per account. Everybody wins.
I vote for this one. If Oveur is getting rid of safespots, lets go all the way and get rid of alts aswell.Sure people would be ****ed off about it for a while, and with every change there is always some drama queen who shouts "OMFG I QUIT!"
Okay, and for those of us who have more than one character on an account for legitimate purposes, and have dedicated training time to them?
Losing a 4mil SP character just cause people abuse alts is unacceptable.
Give people the posibility to move the alts over to another account. Alt are in my book ruining the game more than anything else, also alot of flaming on the forum would probely disapear if we got rid of alts 
/Brunis Another dog lifting its leg |

Brunis
|
Posted - 2004.09.22 06:24:00 -
[80]
Originally by: Aitrus
Originally by: Jozef Meurtrier
Originally by: hired goon One character per account. Everybody wins.
I vote for this one. If Oveur is getting rid of safespots, lets go all the way and get rid of alts aswell.Sure people would be ****ed off about it for a while, and with every change there is always some drama queen who shouts "OMFG I QUIT!"
Okay, and for those of us who have more than one character on an account for legitimate purposes, and have dedicated training time to them?
Losing a 4mil SP character just cause people abuse alts is unacceptable.
Give people the posibility to move the alts over to another account. Alt are in my book ruining the game more than anything else, also alot of flaming on the forum would probely disapear if we got rid of alts 
/Brunis Another dog lifting its leg |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |