|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Orree
Gallente
Dynaverse Corporation
Vertigo Coalition
   |
Posted - 2009.06.27 16:45:00 -
[1]
Good luck, Dianabolic and RKK. I haven't heard much good about FW, but I hope you're able to find the fun you're looking for in it.
I've considered you guys enemies since my Fountain Alliance days. This all just seems weird now. 
|
Orree
Gallente
Dynaverse Corporation
Vertigo Coalition
|
Posted - 2009.06.29 17:15:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Vlad Nitro
Sad day that CCP fail so badly that an attire alliance and holdings and years of effort can be wiped out by a push of a un-intended game mechanic button.
Best of luck guys, enjoy just having fun again 
"Unintended" by whom? If by BoB, that's irrelevent. No one intends to get screwed over--- scam victims, victims of corp thievery, etc. I have yet to see where the ability to do what was done was a possibility that was "unintended" by CCP.
"How much easier it is to be critical than to be correct." ---Benjamin Disraeli |
Orree
Gallente
Dynaverse Corporation
Vertigo Coalition
|
Posted - 2009.06.29 18:39:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Massao
Originally by: Orree
"Unintended" by whom? If by BoB, that's irrelevent. No one intends to get screwed over--- scam victims, victims of corp thievery, etc. I have yet to see where the ability to do what was done was a possibility that was "unintended" by CCP.
See the patch notes about "too much griefing on freeform contracts"?
Yes, I have...and that has what to do with this? Nothing.
"How much easier it is to be critical than to be correct." ---Benjamin Disraeli |
Orree
Gallente
Dynaverse Corporation
Vertigo Coalition
|
Posted - 2009.06.29 20:42:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Orree on 29/06/2009 20:46:18
Originally by: Massao
Originally by: Orree
Originally by: Massao
Originally by: Orree
"Unintended" by whom? If by BoB, that's irrelevent. No one intends to get screwed over--- scam victims, victims of corp thievery, etc. I have yet to see where the ability to do what was done was a possibility that was "unintended" by CCP.
See the patch notes about "too much griefing on freeform contracts"?
Yes, I have...and that has what to do with this? Nothing.
You have claimed that CCP, in their wisdom, never introduce the ability to grief unless it is indeed intended.
I have merely pointed out the most recent instance where your claim is utterly rubbed down and shown to be a shiny piece of whale ****.
Incorrect. I said that CCP has not stated anywhere that I am aware of that what occured in terms in "game mechanics" with the BoB alliance was "unintended." I'll admit that perhaps I worded it poorly.
Some people seem to be under the mistaken belief that "it's not supposed to work that way."
You have seized upon something I didn't say to make a point that has nothing to do with the topic at hand. The vague and very general instances I listed were meant only to show that just because someone gets "done wrong" using "game mechanics," it doesn't necessarily follow that it was "unintended" or an exploit.
Now, we can wax philosophic about the (in-game) morality of these actions, but that isn't the in this case, either.
"How much easier it is to be critical than to be correct." ---Benjamin Disraeli |
Orree
Gallente
Dynaverse Corporation
Vertigo Coalition
|
Posted - 2009.07.02 20:54:00 -
[5]
Multiple threads across two forums (this one and Scrapheap) and really all 90% of you know how to do is whine about blobs, make up statistics and smack each other.
I keep thinking that at some point, even for the least creative thinkers in the pack, this would get old and people would just stop and move on to something else.
No end in sight. 
"How much easier it is to be critical than to be correct." ---Benjamin Disraeli |
|
|
| |
|