Removing a CSM isn't a precedent. Mitt's departure may have been a firstGǪ

The argument that a certain segment of the player base was using was that the only reason people were throwing a tantrum was because it was the Mittani who did it, not because of what he did. If the leader of EVE Uni had been on the CSM and did the exact same thing, it would have never been an issue. The vast majority of the people who were calling for the Mittani to step down/get banned did not give a **** about the player who was mocked and only used it as a political excuse to go after him. Which to me, is every bit as bad as what Mittens did.

It isn't a small thing, and it certainly isn't "just because it was Mitt."

Some people did it for political reasons (In a video game as silly as it sounds.) but it doesn't change the event.

That may be relevant to you, however, such excuses, or attempts at mitigation don't usually fly when put before a judge.