|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
temponita
   |
Posted - 2009.07.03 23:43:00 -
[1]
Wow.. with all the colors and formatting, it looks pretty legit.
So let me break the ice and call total bullsh!t on your post.
Nest time you make something up, you should have least have the balls to present your imaginary data properly. ex: you didn't earn 45m ISK per hour.
Great trolling though.
|
temponita
|
Posted - 2009.07.04 10:39:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Kerfira
Actually, they're not jealous.... They know perfectly well that the figures are correct, but are desparately afraid that CCP will realise the huge disparity between L4 mission income and other types of income, and give it the nerf it requires.
I rest my case.
Next troll please!
|
temponita
|
Posted - 2009.07.04 18:21:00 -
[3]
Kerfira despite the fact that no one believes you, it seems that you've accomplished your task after all.
What's outstanding here is not the misrepresented data and fictitious claims, but rather the level of effort you put-in to keep the fire going. It all adds-up to the overwhelming fact that this thread is nothing but classic trolling.
I've been missioning for well over 1.5 years and my skills are tops and your bullsh!t claims are just that... bullshi!t. You can discount all the people pointing as much as you like but in the end, it doesn't change anything.
Just look back through the thread and see for yourself.
An exact match for a troll-and-feed scenario.
Everyone who knows, knows that we don't make 45m ISK P/hr doing missions. And even a noob could see through you pathetic imaginary claims to get a rise out of people.
Case in point... if you can't fool the players... how would you ever expect to fool the devs.
To the rest of the crowd I say, the time is long overdue to stop feeding this troll.
It's quite obvious that he's already gotten the best of you already. Which is far more than he deserved in the first place.
As for Kerfira, please return to making 45m P/hr -  lol
|
temponita
|
Posted - 2009.07.04 21:03:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Carniflex
As far as dev's and level 4 missions go I'm quite sure they are keeping a keen eye on them vs other income types. It's one of the major income sources in EVE for majority of people afterall and missions have been briefly mentioned in the past economic devblogs also so I'm sure our economist has some numbers on them also.
And yet, your still a liar and a troll.
|
temponita
|
Posted - 2009.07.05 05:45:00 -
[5]
Edited by: temponita on 05/07/2009 05:46:10
Originally by: Baron Aethon
You sir have just been found out to be a liar.
Wasn't it obvious from the beginning?
Just look at the signs.
Trolls are experts at finding new ways to present flambait material.
OP provides stats and figures that are unrealistic and do not add up.
OP works vigilantly to cover oversights divulging new and/or forgotten details along the way(aka. making it up).
OP accuses others of conspiracy and slants when challenged by other knowledgeable players.
OP wanes as he realizes he can no longer contain the discrepancies in his imaginary claims.
OP then returns to hole of origin to work on new angle.
What the OP fails to realize is that many of us do missions as a primary source of income. We know exactly how it works and what to expect. And this is why these(so called) claims are nothing more than imaginary tales.
My guess is, the OP is from the whining lvl4 income group who have been crying foul since the old story began years ago. The same crowd who whined because the game mechanics actually rewarded players who would have trained 2+ yrs to make better ISK without having to melt under the heat of a stack of 24 pirates at gates. The same gang who tried convincing us that they were somehow unable to benefit from the same privileges as all the other players.
The OP clearly canvassed data and compiled his own imaginary mission quota's. Only problem with that however is... that when you imagine doing things... it is near impossible to account for all the little implications that accompany actual gameplay. And so all the little facets that go along with doing missions in the first place are either unaccounted for or simply wrong.
This is why the OP's story doesn't have a leg to stand on, and... has completely saturated the thread trying to compensate with layer after layers of seemingly new information(plug those holes buddy!)
This is why I call him a liar and a troll.
|
temponita
|
Posted - 2009.07.05 22:56:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Kerfira
[GTC buying has the following effect on game economics: Zip, Nada, Zilch, None, Zero
Yet more proof that you FAIL.
Not only does do all accountable profits affect in-game economy, but more importantly, the means by which they are acquired will have a significant impact on the economic system as a whole.
As you continue to drag this thread out, you just end-up sounding worst and worst. And since you failed at baiting anyone but noobs in your little drama queen festivities, it goes without saying that you certainly aren't up to the task of making economic calls either.
Besides... think of all the lost ISK could you of made since you began this little charade almost 48 hours ago. 1.5 to 2 billion at least!
Don't let the door hit you on the way out now...
|
temponita
|
Posted - 2009.07.06 19:19:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Bellalinda
Hello,
I¦m a missionrunner. I love it. With a Apocalypse Navy Issue I fly different missions for Amarr. My best result is the blockade with 55 Mio/h.
But the average is 10-15 Mio/h. I must travel to different Agents. I must fly Transport-missions for Minmatar for standing repair. Everey week I must fly the loot to Amarr und sort/sell/refine the stuff.
OH NOES! ... damned you reality!.. damned you!
|
temponita
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 19:11:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Lrrp
In short what Kerfira doesn't seem to understand, that if it ain't broke...don't fix it. The game is meant to be fun, not meant to be some hellish grind to get to a point where a player can afford to play like the older kids on the block.
Kerfira knows exactly what he's doing here. You don't actually buy into the "I care" angle used in his drama queen festivity do you? Just take a look at the thread and see how an expert troll works things to keep the flame burning.
Bottom line is, this isn't about ISK at all... it's about Kerfira and the need for self glamorization :)
I mean, what else would you expect from a 45m an hour character!
|
temponita
|
Posted - 2009.07.24 11:13:00 -
[9]
Ah well... I guess the troll had to go recalculate his fantasies before coming back for another round of "BS"
Please go back to the hole you came from and take your imaginary numbers with you.
thx
|
temponita
|
Posted - 2009.07.24 14:28:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Kerfira
However, you can make at least 90% of what I do in a decent-fitted, decent-skilled CNR (a properly fitted CNR actually kills faster than a Golem). That is still 3x more than you can make with any other high-sec resource-creating activity!
Missions probably should be the highest earning high-sec activity, but make them earn 1.25-1.5x as much, not 3x as much or more of the second best. Also make them NOT directly out-compete the others (ie. not creating minerals to compete with miners)! It's all about balance between different career paths, and it is woefully un-balanced as it is today!
There are people who have been playing Eve far longer than you have and have been making a living at missioning too.
And we don't have to play your games to conclude your nothing but a liar and a troll.
This is what you do. And this is why you keep coming back to glamorize yourself with such controversial arguments.
Trolling can become a sickness you know.
Try to get some help.
|
|
|
temponita
|
Posted - 2009.07.24 15:40:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Jarey Lantea
Only because YOU are making fckloads of isk does not mean that the rest of us are and it does not mean that mission running is broken.
He doesn't(don't worry).
His claims are complete fabrications and thus the reason no one can replicated them.
This entire thread is the product of a very sad personality.
As long as we post, we feed his sickness.
Otherwise... he'll wane away to formulate a new strategy for attention.
I feel bad for this guy, but in many ways I have no sympathy.
|
|
|
| |
|