Originally by: voogru

---

Edited by: voogru on 21/07/2009 19:33:11

Originally by: DigitalCommunist

---

CCP made plans to remove T2 BPOs - it is a course of action they were openly considering. If there were no player complaints and dramas involved in taking said action, it would have happened.

---

I offered you I think 250 Million ISK for proof of this, which you obviously completely ignored. In fact, you 1 lined my whole post bypassing every argument.

Therefore, I officially declare this statement, as 150% Grade F BULLCRAP. Until you prove otherwise.

And if you do, I'll still honor my 250 Million ISK reward (rules which were stated previously)

Basically what this thread is, if you come up with a good argument, they won't respond to it and just spew their normal chant, unless it supports their view. If you oppose their view, theyÆll call you a evil T2 BPO holder thatÆs just protecting his interests.

1. Removing T2 BPOÆs wonÆt improve profit margins for inventers, please look at many T2 items that are not very profitable. (Nanofibers)
2. Removing T2 BPOÆs wonÆt lower T2 prices, so it does not make T2 more available to players. In fact it may raise T2 prices on some items.
3. Removing T2 BPOÆs is a terrible punishment for the player currently holding the print, the kind of nerf some players are asking for will devastate their capability to make a return on their investment, turning them into astronomical losses for something that is not their fault. All the nerf crowd says in response is ôboohooö or ôhahahaha u suckerö.
4. T2 BPOÆs are a fraction of the T2 item supply on the market. A majority of T2 is provided by inventers.
5. T2 BPOÆs were nerfed astronomically with invention already.
6. Every single person in the nerf crowd would be on the other side if they spent their time earning their own T2 BPOÆs.
7. Every player in EVE can buy a T2 BPO. They have to do the same thing I did, get enough ISK, convince the person to sell it.

Now if youÆll excuse me, IÆll be waiting for the mandatory ôJust another T2 BPO holder that doesnÆt want his cash cow nerfedö posts next, rather than picking apart my arguments.

---