|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Chestrano
   |
Posted - 2009.08.19 18:20:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Chestrano on 19/08/2009 18:23:15
 Originally by: Hadrielloress
Most of what you say is Opinion. What are the standards you speak of? Again Opinion. Do you have a point that is nothing more then Opinion. Becasue you know what they say about Opinions.
Its cute you say it nullifys my argument but dont put up a substantial well reasoned example as to why.Only biased opinions. Rather pathetic actually.
A tempest can finish most long missions at the same speed as those other BS you all say are superior.
I love the blatant Bias people have when it comes to Ships and fittings etc in eve. Its rather Cute and sad panda.
Edit: I seriously doubt either of you read the post and even considered the points made. Seems you just went, LOL TEMPEST HUR DERP HAHAHA. But then Trolls make the internet i suppose.
Most or all arguments your told are already discussed with facts and graphs before and they show that the Tempest isnt good in DPS, Tank or anything special. I have flown the tempest before in pvp and pve, like i did with the raven, the typhoon and Apocalypse. Believe me the Tempest is a joke compared with the Raven and the Apoc. Minmatar can choose damage types, but Em/therm isnt that bad against most NPC mission factions like Drones, Serpentis, Mercs, Sanshas ...
So why do you talking about opinions while so many aguments are already disproven and you are just repeating them?
And dont they I didn¦t understand your post. I do. And its filled with opinions and BS.
|
Chestrano
|
Posted - 2009.08.20 21:13:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Chestrano on 20/08/2009 21:14:03
Originally by: Hadrielloress
blabla troll blabla
Guys its obvious that this char is an Troll.
She offends everybody by saying every person who think the tempest is bad in either playing the game, charbased SP or both.
Further she posts obvious trollfittings.
She says we only bring opinions, while she is ignoring the facts we wrote and writing only opinions by herself (except the 50 million Isk/hour without SP thing. Thats a number. But tbh its hard to believe).
Ignore her. Trolls tend to give up if they dont get attention!
|
Chestrano
|
Posted - 2009.08.20 23:26:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Chestrano on 20/08/2009 23:26:36
Please dont feed the troll
|
Chestrano
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 16:38:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Chestrano on 21/08/2009 16:38:42
Its not only the best Battleship™ Its the best ship™¬« there is for any situation due to the sails!
|
Chestrano
|
Posted - 2009.08.23 21:46:00 -
[5]
"problem still not solved"-bump
|
Chestrano
|
Posted - 2009.08.24 10:44:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Chestrano on 24/08/2009 10:44:27
Originally by: Yoshi Abe
I hope I'm not being thick here, or difficult, I'm just trying to get a better handle on some of this.
Nope, your input is welcome
Giving every minmatar BS a huge bonus and dont buff the projectiles might be the best solution. But there are alot of Large weapon sized ships which need this buff. The T1 and the T2 Battleships.
If you give them all the same bonus it might be an AC/Arty problem. You probably might overbuff one of those while taking the other to the right level. Maybe its better to buff one system a bit and then give all Minmatar BS a Bonus.
The other option there is: Give every ship an different bonus to make minmatarBS versatile.
The Tempest could get a falloff and a bigger alpha bonus, the Vargur would profit from an Falloff bonus from tracking computer/enhancer and could get an 5% alpha per lvl bonus .
The Typhoon ROFbonus could get changed to 7,5% and could get and mass reduction.
the Mael should change the boost amount to restistance and get an 5%-7,5% alpha per lvl bonus . The Mael would profit from the target computer falloff bonus too and would probably be balanced.
|
Chestrano
|
Posted - 2009.08.25 09:24:00 -
[7]
And some other important point is to give tracking computer and tracking enhancer an falloff bonus
|
Chestrano
|
Posted - 2009.08.26 10:45:00 -
[8]
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1131657&page=5
I hope the CSM will see the problem soon.
|
Chestrano
|
Posted - 2009.08.27 15:23:00 -
[9]
bump
|
Chestrano
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 01:13:00 -
[10]
Edited by: Chestrano on 02/09/2009 01:13:57
Edited by: Chestrano on 02/09/2009 01:13:40
Well, I agree with Apo, but like already said: after the boost the tracking enhancer and tracking computer should increase falloff. Maybe even more then optimal?
|
|
|
Chestrano
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2009.09.06 00:54:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Seishi Maru
A simple and shameless bump just because we NEED to reach the 1 thousand replies on this!
CCP already noticed this thread.
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1165197&page=2 |
Chestrano
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2009.09.08 23:00:00 -
[12]
Bump. Minmatar still needs a boost!
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1165197&page=2 |
Chestrano
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2009.09.09 07:00:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Allen Ramses
Sorry, wrong again. You are confusing rate and duration, which are inversely proportional.
Well, actually, you are confusing it... Liang is right. Your calculation is right if you change the "time between to shots" and not ROF.
-
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1165197&page=2 |
|
|
| |
|