|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 61 post(s) |
IamBeastx
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
17
   |
Posted - 2012.05.26 13:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hmmm
Attempt to stop ''B'' team metagaming, thats ok with me, leads to better pewpew imo whilst still allowing the other forms of tournament metagaming.
Forcibly stop one 'group' from entering multiple teams, thats cool too.
Ban that same group from entering completely, bearing in mind they are the previous winners, well known pvpers and a good team, not good, we want the best pvp teams, not 'the best of the rest'.
On another note, waffles (sniggwaffe) would LOVE to kick PL's ass in the tourney, seriously, no quarter would be given by either side.
We're too busy with D3, DayZ and continous BF3 Ownag3 to seriously contend in the tourney.
|
IamBeastx
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
18
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:24:00 -
[2] - Quote
Kadesh Priestess wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:None of those teams had a history of cheating using the exact same methods they were using again this year. Were we not to have to enforce these new rules a conversation with PL or RvB wouldn't have been necessary because those teams would have been in. PL had a b-team in AT9 and probably even earlier. They didn't **** up with finals, but it doesn't mean they were not 'cheating'.
Until ATX secondary teams was not a rule breaker.
|
IamBeastx
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
18
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:33:00 -
[3] - Quote
Kadesh Priestess wrote:IamBeastx wrote:Until ATX secondary teams was not a rule breaker.
Correct, but read this: CCP Sreegs wrote:[quote=Kalvunia IV]stuff... Here Sreegs claims he made an exclusion for RvB and PL because they were not 'cheating' previously, which is not true - in a sense if we apply new rule to previous ATs. If we don't, then Hydra/OB were not cheating either, and his claim is wrong again.
My point is specifically towards previous tournaments, the sperging and quick unchecked replies with regard to this one are a different barrel of gunpowder and matches.
|
IamBeastx
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
18
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:41:00 -
[4] - Quote
Intigo wrote:
It's a good thing that CCP clarified that joining the same corp was not allowed, but practicing together is.
The fact that the rule is so vague is the very reason that CVA & 4th were confused. They had considered doing the very same thing before HYDRA & Outbreak were banned.
Do you think Sreegs would have instantly banned their teams too?
Don't confuse my posts with anything other than replies related to previous tournies, go back a bit further and you'll see i do not agree with the complete ban, even the rules previously posted don't mention A-Teams being banned for having b,c, etc teams
|
IamBeastx
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
21
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:00:00 -
[5] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:
We did mention it somewhere it just really isn't worth my time digging it up for people who won't be participating in this year's alliance tournament.
Of course it is, you are currently the only member of CCP staff actively and publicly replying to this issue.
Most arguments are about them being completely excluded are based on no rules say 'A' teams will be banned as well if found to have 'B' / 'C' etc teams.
Your saying there is a section saying these teams will be removed but won't link/quote it.
Also, there are competing teams asking for this information so dig it up for them.
|
IamBeastx
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
22
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:22:00 -
[6] - Quote
Time Funnel wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:
Thank you for telling me why I do what I do. They are cheats because they were cheating which is why they won't be in this year's tournament as explained in two sticky posts in this very forum.
And there you have it. They were cheating and that is why they were banned. Since the rule changes what they did last year is "no longer ok". Do you guys still want to argue about who said what and whatever? A stupid monkey with a learning disability could see they were cheating. Nobody wanted to say it.
Still waiting on the link/quote stating 'A' teams will get banned if they are deemed to have a 'B' team.
|
IamBeastx
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
22
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:29:00 -
[7] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:IamBeastx wrote:Time Funnel wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:
Thank you for telling me why I do what I do. They are cheats because they were cheating which is why they won't be in this year's tournament as explained in two sticky posts in this very forum.
And there you have it. They were cheating and that is why they were banned. Since the rule changes what they did last year is "no longer ok". Do you guys still want to argue about who said what and whatever? A stupid monkey with a learning disability could see they were cheating. Nobody wanted to say it. Still waiting on the link/quote stating 'A' teams will get banned if they are deemed to have a 'B' team. I linked it a page or two ago.
Missed it due to edit:
Anyway, Quote ''We will be actively removing those alliances that try and add a GÇÿBGÇÖ or GÇÿCGÇÖ team. We want everyone to have a fair chance but stacking the deck in this manner will not be permitted. This removal will also include the main alliance if we detect anyone trying to field more than one team.''.
|
IamBeastx
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
22
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:35:00 -
[8] - Quote
Typhu5 wrote:Anna Katarr wrote:Kazruw Drol wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:[quote=Kazruw Drol]Guys relax. It's just springtime for CCP, and they have a tradition of going full Screegs this time of the year. I just wish this years Alliance Tournament wasn't based on Whose line is it anyway.In the future it would be best if all similar decision had to be accepted by the CSM in order to avoid another Screegs/t20 incident. The rules clearly state that 'B' and 'C' can be disqualified, but say nothing about 'A' teams. oh, nice... so... is hydra or outbreak considered the 'a' team? unban them then...? pretty please? No. Hydra is the B-Team for Outbreak and Outbreak the B-Team for Hydra. That means, both are B-teams and got banned. :-)
We will be actively removing those alliances that try and add a GÇÿBGÇÖ or GÇÿCGÇÖ team. We want everyone to have a fair chance but stacking the deck in this manner will not be permitted. This removal will also include the main alliance if we detect anyone trying to field more than one team.
http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=28644
|
IamBeastx
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
25
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 16:09:00 -
[9] - Quote
Typhu5 wrote:IamBeastx wrote:We will be actively removing those alliances that try and add a GÇÿBGÇÖ or GÇÿCGÇÖ team. We want everyone to have a fair chance but stacking the deck in this manner will not be permitted. This removal will also include the main alliance if we detect anyone trying to field more than one team. http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=28644 I tried a bit sarcasm... and it did not worked... OK Yes i saw the rule and i interpreted it as, one of this two can still join the ATX, because only the B and C Team got banned. But now i am only tired reading this thread.
This removal will also include the main alliance if we detect anyone trying to field more than one team. |
|
|
| |
|