| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Yu Lee
Infinite Improbability Inc
Mostly Harmless
   |
Posted - 2009.07.29 20:27:00 -
[1]
Hi,
I think almost all alliances in EVE that has a JB Network has problems tracking the JB network.
Perhaps a good addition to the game would be a JB Network fee. This fee would be calculated based on the Liquid Ozone consumption of a given ship and subtracted of the char (with a warning message that can be disabled if required).
The JB can be configured to charge for the fee by LO or not.
This would bring the concept of the JB to something much higher than it is.
- JB could be public and allowed to be used by anyone (and even perhaps shown on the overview)
- This would help alliances to prevent or even charge the enemies that try to use its own JB Network. Knowing the password wouldnŠt be enought.
Just a few comments about the issue... but I think the idea can be developed further.
Att,
Yu Lee.
|
Ephemeron
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.07.29 23:11:00 -
[2]
Extensive JB networks are really bad for small scale PvP. Only the large scale fleet battles benefit.
EVE should be more restricting on JB networks, with much higher costs. And JB itself should be much more vulnerable to small roaming gangs.
|
Mr LaboratoryRat
Confederation of DuckTape Lovers
|
Posted - 2009.07.30 09:42:00 -
[3]
I dont see any problems with jumpbridges as how they are now. Jumpbridges are more for small fast transportation (constellation station to constellation station). Big fleets cant use them really unless u have a hauler next to every jumpbridge to refuel it. Besides, who's using jumpbridges for large fleets with all those titans ingame? Titanbridge ftw...
|
Slave 2739FKZ
|
Posted - 2009.07.30 11:25:00 -
[4]
 Originally by: Ephemeron
EVE should be more restricting on JB networks, with much higher costs. And JB itself should be much more vulnerable to small roaming gangs.
This.
Make fitting req. of JB stupidlly large so a PoS can barelly fit a couple of medium/small batteries and some ewar, and reduce the shield HP a big deal so a small roaming gang can incap them.
This would force owners defending their networks and forcing battles around them.
|
Herschel Yamamoto
Agent-Orange
|
Posted - 2009.07.30 18:23:00 -
[5]
Makes sense - not being allowed to charge a fee is kind of silly. And while making bridges vulnerable to roaming gangs is a nifty idea, it's an unrelated topic - make a separate thread for it.
|
Carniflex
Fallout Research
Fallout Project
|
Posted - 2009.08.10 08:15:00 -
[6]
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |