| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Passin Through
   |
Posted - 2009.08.05 17:51:00 -
[1]
I did a quick glance in here and didn't find anything.
I know people are able to fight and win against the new rats in WH's but I'm thinking that the tech 3 ships would probably be better at taking them on... and require less manpower to do so.
So the question would be... what is the best tech 3 ships to use? Or would there need to be a variety of ships to make the take down easier? (Yes I am a tech 3 ship noob so any information would be helpful)
|
Kopach
|
Posted - 2009.08.05 18:04:00 -
[2]
The best for YOU would be the one you can use sooner and the one that you already have weapons and support skills trained for.
All of them can solo C1-C3 WHs with ease.
You could say that Legion has a slight edge for WH action because of the convinience with ammo in long engagements.
|
Lugalzagezi666
|
Posted - 2009.08.05 18:08:00 -
[3]
HML Tengu.
|
Passin Through
|
Posted - 2009.08.05 18:44:00 -
[4]
 Originally by: Kopach
All of them can solo C1-C3 WHs with ease.
I'm talking about going into Level 6 Worm Holes.
|
Davinel Lulinvega
|
Posted - 2009.08.05 18:47:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Passin Through
Originally by: Kopach
All of them can solo C1-C3 WHs with ease.
I'm talking about going into Level 6 Worm Holes.
If you bring anything that isn't an rr bs, logistic, or scorp, you're pretty much dead weight.
Originally by: CCP Tuxford
Now the op looks like a weirdo that can't read kekekeke!
inb4 stealth edit |
fuxinos
Caldari
Guys 0f Sarcasm
|
Posted - 2009.08.05 18:49:00 -
[6]
Edited by: fuxinos on 05/08/2009 18:50:31
For everything above c3, you need more dps then any of them can do.
|
Davinel Lulinvega
|
Posted - 2009.08.05 18:55:00 -
[7]
Ok, so some quick eft tells me they do everything worse than an rr bs. Get an rr bs.
Originally by: CCP Tuxford
Now the op looks like a weirdo that can't read kekekeke!
inb4 stealth edit |
CAPSLOCKBROKE
Exploratory Technologies
|
Posted - 2009.08.05 19:05:00 -
[8]
whoa whoa, your talking about class 6?
None of the tech 3's would be acceptable for that, you need RR Battleships.
However, a decent role would be a cloaked one with the warfare subsytem and scan probe bonus. You could stay cloaked, find sites, then give a bonus to all your comrades while staying out of the fight.
Tech 3 cruisers are just too fragile to handle the extreme dps of a group of sleeper Battleships imo. You could find yourself down a billion ISK in no time. You want to handle those kind of sites, you need a large group of battleships, all with remote rep abilities, some solid ECM ships, and some solid Logistic ships.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"ACH! HANS, RUN! ITS THE TROLL!"
~CAPSLOCKBROKE, last words |
Mors Magne
M. Corp
Mostly Harmless
|
Posted - 2009.08.05 19:19:00 -
[9]
Anything a T3 ship could do a Drake could probably do better.
The most important thing a Drake can do is survive lone PvPers in W-space. This is due to it's massive passive tank and reasonable damage-dealing ability.
I think T3s really shine in a roaming gang where they can all remote-rep and give each other bonuses.
|
Passin Through
|
Posted - 2009.08.05 19:42:00 -
[10]
Originally by: CAPSLOCKBROKE
whoa whoa, your talking about class 6?
None of the tech 3's would be acceptable for that, you need RR Battleships.
Thanks for these assessments.
It will help keep me focused on what is needed
and information should help others too.
|
RiotRick
Black-Sun
Pitch Black Legion
|
Posted - 2009.08.05 22:53:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Mors Magne
Anything a T3 ship could do a Drake could probably do better.
This just utter crap ;)
--
The future is black.
|
Cadius Vect
Domination.
THE KLINGONS
|
Posted - 2009.08.06 02:42:00 -
[12]
Originally by: RiotRick
Originally by: Mors Magne
Anything a T3 ship could do a Drake could probably do better.
This just utter crap ;)
Spend a 1.5 billion ISK on a drake fit(what a fitted t3 will cost) and you would be wrong there.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Killboard: http://www.battleclinic.com/eve_online/pk/view/player-Cadius+Vect-kills.html |
Kopach
|
Posted - 2009.08.06 02:56:00 -
[13]
Edited by: Kopach on 06/08/2009 02:57:28
I`ve spend 1.5 bill on a Drake in a form of CN invuls, Deathspace hardeners/amps and T2 rigs, and Tengu is still much better.
Passive Tank, Tengu wins.
Active Tank, Tengu wins
DPS, Tengu wins.
Sig?Agility?Speed? etc
|
Katarlia Simov
Minmatar
Cowboys From Hell
|
Posted - 2009.08.06 05:06:00 -
[14]
Anyone else think that T3 would be better if the remote-rep subsystems actually made them any good at remote repping ?
I mean a decent range bonus, and a cap use bonus would make them good.
Not as much raw rep as a logistics ship, but with the possibility to fit a good size tank. Not as epic as most t3 tanks, but get some good EHP.
|
Aineko Stryer
Minmatar
Aineko Accelerando Labs
|
Posted - 2009.08.08 08:20:00 -
[15]
http://eve.battleclinic.com/loadout/22770-Loki-Shield-RR-Voltron.html
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |