This may have been the original conception but it hasn't been true since at least 2006. The sooner that we recongnise that Hi-sec isn't just a starter area, the sooner we can have a sensible debate on how to develop it to provide high-end, high-risk, high-reward gameplay.

I wrote a thing.

Close, but not quite. All issues stem from people falsely believing it's a tutorial area. As soon as people drop this notion, the vast majority of the supposed issues go away.

If people stop assuming that it is, and stop thinking that they can hide behind it, the level of automated safety turns out to be just right GÇö perhaps even a bit on the high side GÇö and they will start to create their own security, there as everywhere else.

Stop spreading the myth.

Nope, some ppl think they know , and are biased towards there own play style. Everyone complains when they think its tipped towards the play style of someone else..

Tal

Its not just a tutorial area, can you show me where it says that in the official documentation ?

The high security areas are the safer places at which to start, until you are ready to venture into the more aggressive areas of the game.

I cant be asked to answer dumb questions.

To offer different buckets and spades.

Read the responses in this thread that may give you a clue.

Can you point to the part were it says that other players can't target or shoot you in the "tutorial zones"?

Nope, some ppl think they know , and are biased towards there own play style. Everyone complains when they think its tipped towards the play style of someone else..

No not really, I can see from your posts that no one can tell you anything, so whats the point.

Obscure concept,

Tal

No. That is not what CONCORD does. You are confusing CONCORD with game masters.

Remember the old adage, repeated again and again by CCP: CONCORD provides consequences, not protection.
You're only illustrating yet another false myth about highsec, just like you keep repeating the false myth that highsec is a starter area. It's the repetitions of this kind of nonsense that keeps making highsec that keeps so many issues alive.

No. CONCORD GǣprotectsGǥ everyone by ensuring that all aggression in highsec comes at a costGǪ and again, it's not actual protection.

Protection (of a non-player kind) only exists in the tutorial systems (and there, it comes in the form of harsher rules and nasty ebil GMs). It does not exist in highsec beyond what players can create for themselves.

What exactly is your stance. What is it you think CCP should do?

Mate if you don't know what "play style" is or find the concept obscure then It's not my small mind you need worry about.

Personal attacks attack as well, you running out of overly worded zero content replies ?

Tal


P.S I wasn't trying to be funny.

Play style is the way you play the game, be it miner, PVP god or what ever.

Some ppl love the manufacturing, PI, trading part of Eve but don't want to play pew pew, others want to shoot everything that moves and a few things that don't and screw non combat roles.

All should be catered for in Eve

Tal

It sort of failed at that, didn't it?

Hi sec only puts in a cost into doing that. Once someone is too big to care about costs, that obstacle becomes irrelevant.

Some months ago.

I am actually surprised no goon has thought about how fun it'd be to permanently camp every hi sec main and secondary route and hub. Something like burn Jita (which would be a "beta test" but permanent and spread everywhere).

If I was a goon I'd force EvE to die just because it's amusing. Plus they already rolled on several GW2 servers, so they have a replacement game where to go anyway.