Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Mutnin
SQUIDS.
217
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 19:18:00 -
[1] - Quote
...to capture a system under the new FW game mechanics. The system was Tama no less, a well known system throughout all of EVE as a popular hot spot for pirate types and for people whom want to blow up internet space ships.
Cheers to all those that plexed it and the ones whom showed up to shoot down the bunker, which gave about as much resistance as the Galentte Militia did. The resistance being pretty much null & void. (ie they didn't show)
Tama used to be with-in the 4 or 5 jump radius, Gal Militia was willing to travel to get a fight, but seems it was just a bit too far out of their safety net last night.
Youtube video of the fight for Tama..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkfVdrtLcRs&ob=av3e
|

Dread Pirate Pete
Tribal Core Defiant Legacy
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 19:30:00 -
[2] - Quote
Pretty sure we took Lamaa a while back  |

Vordak Kallager
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
290
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 19:31:00 -
[3] - Quote
Sorry bro, I led the fleet that captured Raa last week on Thursday, I think it was. But, congrats on taking Tama. Sa souvraya niende misain ye. |

Vordak Kallager
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
290
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 19:31:00 -
[4] - Quote
Dread Pirate Pete wrote:Pretty sure we took Lamaa a while back 
We took Lamaa Pre-Inferno, but as I said above, we did take Raa under the new system. Sa souvraya niende misain ye. |

Mutnin
SQUIDS.
217
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 20:03:00 -
[5] - Quote
Vordak Kallager wrote:Dread Pirate Pete wrote:Pretty sure we took Lamaa a while back  We took Lamaa Pre-Inferno, but as I said above, we did take Raa under the new system.
Does Raa really count? It's a station-less system in the middle of nowhere.
After heated discussion with fellow Caldari, we decided to let you share in our lime light for taking a insignificant system that nobody really cares about. We however took Tama after all, a station system that is a hot bed for piracy and dirty shenanigans.
Tama > Raa
(btw don't mind me I'm polishing up on my null sec snobbery, being we are after all now in null sec lite) |

Dread Pirate Pete
Tribal Core Defiant Legacy
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:03:00 -
[6] - Quote
Vordak Kallager wrote:Dread Pirate Pete wrote:Pretty sure we took Lamaa a while back  We took Lamaa Pre-Inferno, but as I said above, we did take Raa under the new system.
right, confused the names |

Capitol One
Wolfsbrigade Lost Obsession
31
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:05:00 -
[7] - Quote
Mutnin wrote:Vordak Kallager wrote:Dread Pirate Pete wrote:Pretty sure we took Lamaa a while back  We took Lamaa Pre-Inferno, but as I said above, we did take Raa under the new system. Does Raa really count? It's a station-less system in the middle of nowhere. After heated discussion with fellow Caldari, we decided to let you share in our lime light for taking a insignificant system that nobody really cares about. We however took Tama after all, a station system that is a hot bed for piracy and dirty shenanigans. Tama > Raa ( btw don't mind me I'm polishing up on my null sec snobbery, being we are after all now in null sec lite)
Tsk, tsk Mutnin.
Making fun of sweet Vordak for taking an insignificant system, it's making me want to make fun of you for being all insignificant yourself. But I shant, for I am nice 
- Capitol One |

Rezig Huruta
AD ASTRA Interstellar
17
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:31:00 -
[8] - Quote
Shouldn't really matter which system was taken, because your claim is:
Mutnin wrote:...to capture a system under the new FW game mechanics.
Not "...to capture a SIGNIFICANT system under the new FW game mechanics."
Be specific. |

Vordak Kallager
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
291
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:42:00 -
[9] - Quote
Why are you all so mean to me?  Sa souvraya niende misain ye. |

Thor Yaken
Black-Epsilon
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:45:00 -
[10] - Quote
Gratz fot taking Tama, was a good work . |
|

Gallactica
Shadows Of The Federation Drunk 'n' Disorderly
118
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:56:00 -
[11] - Quote
Duhhh, we let you take it so your 2 jumps from our home system. You've been moaning like a big girl for ages so happy birthday. |

Gallactica
Shadows Of The Federation Drunk 'n' Disorderly
118
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:56:00 -
[12] - Quote
Joking apart, nice job tbh mate. |

Tekitha
Shadows Of The Federation Drunk 'n' Disorderly
42
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 22:24:00 -
[13] - Quote
Mutnin wrote:... Tama used to be with-in the 4 or 5 jump radius, Gal Militia was willing to travel to get a fight, but seems it was just a bit too far out of their safety net last night.
Or it could have been more to do with the time of day the bunker went vulnerable. Honestly we (me and my 1 corp mate online) were rather baffled as to how many guys you had online at that hour. We came to the conclusion you either have loads of aussie's / japanese players or you are actually calling CTA's for "silly-o-clock" plexing (I sincerely hope it's the former). I saw the system at 99.5% vulnerable and asked around in intel channels if any1 was active for a defense fleet, I got 2 x's and a couple of guys saying they were going to bed in <15 minutes so I just called it a night myself.
Anyways, so as not to belittle your achievement, congratulations on your prowess at PVE :) |

Jones Bones
Imperial Outlaws
62
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 22:56:00 -
[14] - Quote
I just came into this thread to gloat about shooting a structure. Am I doing it right? |

Lock out
Shadows Of The Federation Drunk 'n' Disorderly
200
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 23:05:00 -
[15] - Quote
Jones Bones wrote:I just came into this thread to gloat about shooting a structure. Am I doing it right?
Can a deity like yourself do it wrong ? |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Villore Accords
150
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 00:58:00 -
[16] - Quote
Well we had fun defending kedama this afternoon since it went vulnerable when some of us were actually online lol. |

Kuehnelt
Amarrian Retribution Amarr 7th Fleet
61
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 02:18:00 -
[17] - Quote
Tekitha wrote:Or it could have been more to do with the time of day the bunker went vulnerable
Or it could be that the factors that led you to ignore it as it climbed in contested% are the same factors that would've prevented you from decontesting it after winning a bunker fight, so why bother? Maybe you can gank a few Tr3s over a bunker, but if there were a will to keep the system you would've seen heavy fighting well before it went vulnerable. And, once it's vulnerable, it will take about as long to flip it back as it would to decontest it, so even if you did suddenly acquire a will to have the system, why not wait a bit and then secure it when you'll get paid to do so?
The only time it'd really matter for you to hold a system that you'd let get so contested is when you realize that losing it will knock you down one bracket of warzone control. But the brackets are so big, that's never going to happen. |

Tentaki
Percussive Diplomacy PERCUSSIVE PIZZA TIME DIPLOMACY
6
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 02:31:00 -
[18] - Quote
Didn't want that system anyways.
Seriously though, no one cares about Tama anymore.
Gj orbiting buttons and shooting a structure. |

Joanna Ramirez
Intaki Militia
9
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 07:42:00 -
[19] - Quote
Jumped the gun there a bit Mutnin but yeah, it was first station system taken with new mechanics. |

Vyktor Abyss
The Abyss Corporation
142
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 08:39:00 -
[20] - Quote
Halp halp, I cant get access to my cloaking merlin! CCP I demand you change these stupid mechanics or I'll cancel my 1 subscription!!!                                          |
|

Terrorfrodo
Deep Space Darwinian Law Enforcement Agency
71
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 08:48:00 -
[21] - Quote
As a newcomer to FW with no actual experience yet, I'd be interested to know what it took to conquer Tama. Cap fleet? 30 Drakes? 10? And how long did it take?
(And btw, why do I read everywhere on the forums that Caldari do guerilla warfare because we are outnumbered by Gallente, but ingame the FW tab claims that Caldari have siginificantly more warzone control than Gallente?) Winner of elections banned, runner-up demoted by rest of the body, the council controlled by the losers. CSM 7 is illegitimate, CCP should remember when dealing with them. Remember what players voted for. |

marketjacker
Percussive Diplomacy PERCUSSIVE PIZZA TIME DIPLOMACY
28
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 09:04:00 -
[22] - Quote
Oh **** I can't dock in Tama anymore.....oh wait.
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Villore Accords
151
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 09:52:00 -
[23] - Quote
Terrorfrodo wrote:As a newcomer to FW with no actual experience yet, I'd be interested to know what it took to conquer Tama. Cap fleet? 30 Drakes? 10? And how long did it take?
(And btw, why do I read everywhere on the forums that Caldari do guerilla warfare because we are outnumbered by Gallente, but ingame the FW tab claims that Caldari have siginificantly more warzone control than Gallente?)
It took them a lot of pve and then just a little waiting till there was no gallente online to defend it. Basically. |

Mutnin
SQUIDS.
220
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 10:10:00 -
[24] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Well we had fun defending kedama this afternoon since it went vulnerable when some of us were actually online lol.
I see by dot lan that went well for you guys.. 
Congrats Caldari for being the Only Militia to capture two systems under the new Sov system.. |

X Gallentius
Quantum Cats Syndicate
242
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 10:56:00 -
[25] - Quote
I hear there are nice vacation POS's for sale in Iwisoda. Caldari still only at +1. (Nice job on Ked btw) |

Joanna Ramirez
Intaki Militia
9
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 11:05:00 -
[26] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:I hear there are nice vacation POS's for sale in Iwisoda. Caldari still only at +1. (Nice job on Ked btw)
Took you long enough but we figured it was not worth trying to hold into it due to it's sub-optimal position and lack of station.
Besides, I had a theory that SLAPD might not want to even take it but keep it continuously "on the brink" since with new mechanics it's pretty much in a prime spot for LP farming. I mean, that's pretty much what I would do with Vifrevaert if I still lived in Ladistier.
|

Andre Vauban
Quantum Cats Syndicate
20
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 13:30:00 -
[27] - Quote
Terrorfrodo wrote:As a newcomer to FW with no actual experience yet, I'd be interested to know what it took to conquer Tama. Cap fleet? 30 Drakes? 10? And how long did it take?
(And btw, why do I read everywhere on the forums that Caldari do guerilla warfare because we are outnumbered by Gallente, but ingame the FW tab claims that Caldari have siginificantly more warzone control than Gallente?)
I heard they took it with a fleet of about 30 BCs. Gallente dominate US and EU TZ. Gallente will win most fleet fight during these times, but Caldari have more active pilots that spread out, run plexes everywhere, and do very well in small gang fights where they can avoid the Gallente "Jesus Blob". Caldari dominate AU timezone. You can kind of think of it as the Gallente win most of the battles, but are losing the war.
The Caldari are capturing around 150 more plexes per day than the Gallente, so that is around 50 man hours a day of extra plexing. It's now just a matter of whose morale breaks first IE do the Gallente give up or do enough Caldari grow weary of sitting on buttons that the Gallente can get the upper hand again.
The ingame militia member count is totally useless. That is the total number of pilots enlisted in the militia since 2008. There are TONS of inactive accounts in that number. They should really remove it as it provides no value. |

BolsterBomb
Bane Inc INQUISITION.
63
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 13:44:00 -
[28] - Quote
Andre Vauban wrote:
The Caldari are capturing around 150 more plexes per day than the Gallente, so that is around 50 man hours a day of extra plexing. It's now just a matter of whose morale breaks first IE do the Gallente give up or do enough Caldari grow weary of sitting on buttons that the Gallente can get the upper hand again. .
We get fights orbiting buttons, I dont know why people keep saying that. I even had someone drop in on my test fit last night.
*shakesfist at cat casidy*
Really if you keep taking the mindset orbiting buttons is orbiting buttons, by all means do it.
You will be locked out of most systems in a month or so I predict. Brig General of The Caldari State
Traitor and Ex Luminaire General of The Gallente Federation |

Andre Vauban
Quantum Cats Syndicate
20
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 13:58:00 -
[29] - Quote
BolsterBomb wrote:Andre Vauban wrote:
The Caldari are capturing around 150 more plexes per day than the Gallente, so that is around 50 man hours a day of extra plexing. It's now just a matter of whose morale breaks first IE do the Gallente give up or do enough Caldari grow weary of sitting on buttons that the Gallente can get the upper hand again. .
We get fights orbiting buttons, I dont know why people keep saying that. I even had someone drop in on my test fit last night. *shakesfist at cat casidy* Really if you keep taking the mindset orbiting buttons is orbiting buttons, by all means do it. You will be locked out of most systems in a month or so I predict.
Bolster, you don't understand what I'm saying. There are two distinct types of Caldari at this point. Those that PVP and those that farm LP. If it's State Pro people, I've bum rushed plexes with 1:3 to 1:5 odds against me, and they run. If you sit in the plex, they go one system over and start a plex there. If you follow them, they run to another plex somewhere else. On the other hand, then there are Caldari that will fight for every plex. I get 90% of my fights in plexes, I actually love it. When I talk about sitting on a button, I'm referring to the LP farmers. If we can break their morale and get them to farm isk elsewhere, then things will turn around for the Gallente. The PVP Caldari are hardcore and their morale won't break. |

Terrorfrodo
Deep Space Darwinian Law Enforcement Agency
82
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 14:26:00 -
[30] - Quote
Andre Vauban wrote:I heard they took it with a fleet of about 30 BCs. Gallente dominate US and EU TZ. Gallente will win most fleet fight during these times, but Caldari have more active pilots that spread out, run plexes everywhere, and do very well in small gang fights where they can avoid the Gallente "Jesus Blob". Caldari dominate AU timezone. You can kind of think of it as the Gallente win most of the battles, but are losing the war.
The Caldari are capturing around 150 more plexes per day than the Gallente, so that is around 50 man hours a day of extra plexing. It's now just a matter of whose morale breaks first IE do the Gallente give up or do enough Caldari grow weary of sitting on buttons that the Gallente can get the upper hand again.
The ingame militia member count is totally useless. That is the total number of pilots enlisted in the militia since 2008. There are TONS of inactive accounts in that number. They should really remove it as it provides no value.
Good info, thanks :) The Invulnerability Sphere:Make mining/industrial vessels defendable, better fights for everyone! |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |