Keep those Joke replies coming:)

No

Learn to adapt and all that other horseshit people tell highsec players

op you are the most pathetic kind of scum wagon jumping me-tooing everything you see on the gd, low even for the gd, oh i am anti goon, but now i am going to start ganking too
let's not forget how creepy you were for issler dainze a few months back

lurk more, read up on nickyo, masternerdguy, and those other regulars, count to ten before you post. christ

Another possible option by Mors Sanctitatis

Posting in a thread created by an idiot who doesnt realize removing local from 0.0 would make it essentially the same as W-space

I, too, enjoy killing variety and gameplay options in my sandbox.

let's not forget how creepy you were for issler dainze a few months back

0.0 without Local is nothing like Wormhole space go read the whole argument thread it was brought up several times and shot down in flames by different people.

never forget

0.0 NPC without local would be exactly like w-space with the only exception being that the belts would have rats.

There is a reason why CCP doesnt listen to the tunnel-vision idiots such as yourself, they have a bigger picture of things

Clearly someone who has never even been to WH space.

You're clearly someone who has never left hisec

You're clearly someone who has never left hisec

Why do you say that? ..and do you also think that the only thing distinguishing Wormhole Space and NPC Null Sec is Local and belt rats?

Nullsec already pays for local's intel with Sov bills.

Requesting removal of local in highsec instead, they didnt paid for it and they have concord already. Its used for jita scamming only anyway.

Pls vote for removing highsec local, that would attract more people to null.

Yeah for my next amazing trick I might even try to get a member of Goonwarm to finish an entire term on the CSM.

Like in CSM 1,2,3, and 4, you mean?

No.

Aside from the usual argument, removing local would significantly reduce the chance of engagement/fights and made it far harder to collect useful intel for fleet engagements and small gang roams. Fleet battles, small gang roams are some of the reasons people go to null in the first place.

Yeah this is a great idea. Make 0.0 even less enjoyable to live in than it is already. I'm sure that will attract people to live out there in droves.

So your argument is keep it for the same reasons the population is so low atm. 0.0 should be so much more than easy Pvp.

Pretty much this.

Every time Frying Doom is pushed on this, all he does is respond with "well that's just, like, your opinion, man!", even though he himself says that nullsec is more depopulated than it should be, and the risk vs reward aspect is broken. So he wants to fix that by making it riskier still, and expects that suddenly the hisec population will see that nullsec is a hardcore place and suddenly man up and go out there in droves.

I don't quite understand his logic, but that's why we keep getting these topics, because of people like himi, with his weird sense of logic. vOv

i dunno where his plan of highsec pubbies waging a guerilla war on goons' mining backbone could go wrong. Clearly the one barrier must be the existence of local.

Maybe it should be kind of "tiered" - in terms of the lore it could be reasoned out as: high sec has the most infrastructure so has full local, lowsec/nullsec have less infrastructure so only have a constellation wide "local", wormholes have nothing (and love it)

How do you Vote Yes on the removal of local in Null space?

Just click the Like button on
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=110995&find=unread

This post contains the removal of Local completely but the majority of replies are on removing Local in 0.0

It would make Pvp harder but also more strategic as you would not be able to get instant information as to your oponents size for one thing

and it would create a system that would favour the attentive rather than the current system that favours the lazy.

No.

Aside from the usual argument, removing local would significantly reduce the chance of engagement/fights and made it far harder to collect useful intel for fleet engagements and small gang roams. Fleet battles, small gang roams are some of the reasons people go to null in the first place.

Just block Lord Zim. He has never said anything of value. Ever.

What happened to adapt or die? Or does that only apply when things work in your favor?

Get voter support for it as authorised in the CSM charter - there is a special button / checkbox to support a CSM topic.
If it gains a certain level of support they are FORCED to consider it.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Forced by who? The CSM pushes it's own personal agenda. An agenda that is comprised of the entities that put them there. Seriously what rock have you been living under?

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Forced by who? The CSM pushes it's own personal agenda. An agenda that is comprised of the entities that put them there. Seriously what rock have you been living under?

TBH, it's actually something we're going to discuss at the summit. ATM it does seem to be the step-child of the forums.

Just 27 more likes to go and the No local for 0.0 thread could run for the CSM.

Please press like at
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=110995&find=unread

wrong forum, do not pass go, do not collect $200

Yeah, the one that's in General Discussion and not Assembly Hall (which is where proposals with enough likes are eligible for CSM consideration, not GD). Meaning this whole thread was a dumb misinformed waste of time. Which it would have been anyway GD or no-GD.

Oh except the CSM just discussed this in the last couple of days and the system may or may not be valid anymore, no one but the CSM and CCP knows.

Read more type less.

Oh except the CSM just discussed this in the last couple of days and the system may or may not be valid anymore, no one but the CSM and CCP knows.

Read more type less.

Strange I click on the link and it takes me to the forum titled "Grow some extremely durable genitalia."

Were does your send you? Null bear land.

Well if the system won't be valid (IE, it doesn't need to be in Assembly Hall), what the hell makes you think it'd still use the same rules regarding numbers of likes and whatnot?

Power of wishful thinking, I'm guessing.

Well if the system won't be valid (IE, it doesn't need to be in Assembly Hall), what the hell makes you think it'd still use the same rules regarding numbers of likes and whatnot? Come on dude.