Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
1. [PROPOSAL] Do something about 1 man corp decs - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Whenever I think EVE can't get any lamer, someone posts a thread like this to remind me there is bottom to the well of lameness, especially when it concerns PvE raiders like these Incursion runners in EVE.
- by Xorv - at 2012.08.17 00:46:00
|
2. How would you define a "carebear"? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Carebears are cartoon teddy bears from the 80s with rainbows on their chest, known for caring about others. As such it's actually a terribly inaccurate term to describe those generally labeled as such in MMOs. Those being as Tippia most closely id...
- by Xorv - at 2012.08.13 20:41:00
|
3. Make players pay for CONCORD/crimewatch protection - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote: Concord protection fees based on my owned assets? That just means that my main never owns more than the ship he's flying, and the rest is held by an alt that never undocks. When it comes time to pay the Concord "tax"...
- by Xorv - at 2012.08.08 17:12:00
|
4. Make players pay for CONCORD/crimewatch protection - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
There's too many advantages and not enough disadvantages with generating wealth in Highsec. If player want the protection afforded by Local Navy and CONCORD there should be a heavy price for that. CONCORD/Crimewatch becomes a voluntary sign on, t...
- by Xorv - at 2012.08.08 08:54:00
|
5. Two more accounts unsubbed. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jupiter's ****! reading some of the replies in this thread, what a bunch of petty lamers some of you are! .. was going to type more on EVE, but really it isn't even worth it.. I just think " Inferno " and Mors Sanctitatis see you in Planetside...
- by Xorv - at 2012.08.07 09:51:00
|
6. So why is 20% of the game's population representing the entire CSM? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
JonnyRandom wrote: If you had read the thread, you'd see that I am looking for two things: 1. Is this an issue that needs to be addressed? 2. How can this issue be addressed? 1. No Why, because the issue as stated is manufactured from the m...
- by Xorv - at 2012.08.03 02:08:00
|
7. Sticky:New dev blog: CSM Meeting Minutes - Summer 2012 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
The good: * Transparency on who said what, particularly CSM positions on issues. (Didn't need to include banter and jokes though) * That CCP thinks off grid boosting shouldn't exist. * POS ideas show promise The bad: I could write a lot here, b...
- by Xorv - at 2012.08.03 01:58:00
|
8. The new Self-destruct mechanics. How to fix it in 5 steps! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
All the posters arguing against the SD changes because they think killing yourself ought to be a "useful" "viable" tactic should apply the same philosophy to their fight against the changes, and simply delete all their own posts.
- by Xorv - at 2012.08.02 07:45:00
|
9. So why is 20% of the game's population representing the entire CSM? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Incredibly ignorant or troll post, I can't decide which. I'm leaning to towards trolling, no one can be that stupid surely?
- by Xorv - at 2012.08.02 00:35:00
|
10. The new Self-destruct mechanics. How to fix it in 5 steps! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
No, Also fail to see how any of your ideas make things more interesting in any way. Others and myself have suggested ship capture be linked into SD.. that would be interesting.
- by Xorv - at 2012.08.01 20:32:00
|
11. Self-destruct changes on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Senn Denroth wrote: The loot dropping idea however ... doesn't make a lot of sense at all as the self destruction of a ship means the ship is getting destroyed from the inside out (assuming that the charges have been placed properly, lol). I...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.31 06:07:00
|
12. Self-destruct changes on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Good change. Remove Insurance payout as well.
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.31 01:28:00
|
13. why give mining barges a ridiculous boost and not tighten restrictions on -10s i... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
clamslayer wrote: wtf CCP, why make ships ungankable when the real issue is freedom of -10s in high sec? Miners are being ganked indiscriminately because: -10 can fly around high sec in destroyers with out being stopped at gates. -10s should...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.30 23:24:00
|
14. Off Gride Command Bonuses Please don't nerf them. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
MotherMoon wrote: Just introduce off grid boosters. The catch being to.boost off grid, you have to enter a Seige type mode. That would be a reasonable alternative to on-grid only boosting. I would add that near unprobability should also go....
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.29 01:23:00
|
15. Off Gride Command Bonuses Please don't nerf them. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Whar Target wrote: I can't imagine the number of lost subscriptions any on-grid booster nerf would result in. Go ahead, whine and troll me for saying it, but it's the truth and CCP knows it. It would also be another buff to blob warfare and a...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.28 19:59:00
|
16. Fake wardecs / Griefing wars - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What's the TL:DR of the OP? Nerf solo PvPers so that players in a "1000 man alliance" that are unable to defend themselves against a single player can make hordes of risk free ISK running Highsec Incursions? Wow, that's a whole new level of lame...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.26 00:26:00
|
17. Self-destructing your ship should not give you insurance money - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Another +1 for removing Insurance entirely, but especially in the case of Self Destruct. Further more regarding Self Destruct, make it a means for people to potentially capture ships. * As soon as you activate SD, your pod is ejected from the s...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.25 20:04:00
|
18. ITT: Discussion about Missions being used as a low sec boost - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
VaL Iscariot wrote: : 1. Sleeper AI in low sec missions Pro: Curbs afk mission runners and possible gankers. Its hard to keep a player tackled if all the NPC's suddenly join his/her side. Con: Alters and restricts some player behavior. ...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.22 19:23:00
|
19. Grows some balls. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Corina Jarr wrote: You don't understand. You won't ever get carebears, or partial carebears, to enter a free PvP zone. They will learn that they can be probed down and killed without knowing anyone is there, and they will either leave the gam...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.22 04:40:00
|
20. Cloaking - Make it respect the laws of thermodynamics? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: Xorv wrote: Remove Local Chat Intel! Remove L3 and L4s from hisec. Sounds good.
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.21 20:26:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |