Originally by: THE L0CK

---

Originally by: Ranger 1

---

Originally by: THE L0CK

---

Hi Lock here,

I didn't bother reading one bit of this dust thread as I'm quite positive somebody has asked what you have asked and stated what you have stated in the multitude of dust threads now.
There are some massive Dust threads in OOPE where you may find what you are looking for as dust threads got moved there a while back so the denizens of GD didn't have to put up with them.

---

... and now have relaxed that restriction now that the post patch forum fury is over.

Pro tip: Next time read before you comment. It makes you look a bit less like a tart.

---

Did I say read the sticky !!!1one1!!!? No?

Did I mention that there are several threads in OOPE that most likely have the information that he has displayed because the mods moved them there a while back and never moved them back.

Pro tip: Next time read before you comment. It makes you look a bit less like a tart.

---

Originally by: THE L0CK

---

Originally by: Wulfnor

---

Edited by: Wulfnor on 26/08/2009 17:55:04

Originally by: THE L0CK

---

Originally by: Ranger 1

---

... and now have relaxed that restriction now that the post patch forum fury is over.

Pro tip: Next time read before you comment. It makes you look a bit less like a tart.

---

Did I say read the sticky !!!1one1!!!? No?

Did I mention that there are several threads in OOPE that most likely have the information that he has displayed because the mods moved them there a while back and never moved them back.

Pro tip: Next time read before you comment. It makes you look a bit less like a tart.

---

How you can be any kinda positive about something you proudly proclaim you did not read, then to go on and give people a pro tip to read before commenting on things makes me wonder how valid anything you write might be.

if you wish to point people to some area there is some else to read on the topic then do so. The rest of what you have written is a distraction at best.

---

I'm all kinds of positive. In fact I'm positive you don't have a clue as to what is even being discussed. But its people like you that makes these forums so enjoyable to read. NEXT!

---

Originally by: THE L0CK

---

Originally by: Wulfnor

---

And people like you who make them not enjoyable.

---

aaawwww would you like a hug?

---

Originally by: THE L0CK

---

Originally by: Wulfnor

---

aaawwww would you like a hug?

---

and the thought that you are keeping a thread whose opening post you did not read and you apparently think is worthless, at the top of the section makes me smile.

So feel free to keep posting :)

Originally by: THE L0CK

---

Originally by: Wulfnor

---

Edited by: Wulfnor on 26/08/2009 18:54:39

Originally by: THE L0CK

---

aaawwww would you like a hug?

---

and the thought that you are keeping a thread whose opening post you did not read and you apparently think is worthless, at the top of the section makes me smile.

So feel free to keep posting :)

---

Point to where I said it was worthless. All I said was that I didn't read it because what he stated has most likely been said or done in one of the mega threads that were moved to OOPE.
Further proof it seems that you have no clue what is going on. Sorry to burst your bubble like that as I'm sure you felt that post was a clever one, but keep your chin up young padawan, you may be witty yet.

Also L2properlyquote

---

Originally by: THE L0CK

---

Originally by: Wulfnor

---

Originally by: THE L0CK

---

Point to where I said it was worthless. All I said was that I didn't read it because what he stated has most likely been said or done in one of the mega threads that were moved to OOPE.
Further proof it seems that you have no clue what is going on. Sorry to burst your bubble like that as I'm sure you felt that post was a clever one, but keep your chin up young padawan, you may be witty yet.

Also L2properlyquote

---

Didn't read it but then went on later to point out that people should read things before posting.

---

Its good advice and I highly recommend that you take it because you obviously have no idea why I even mentioned it, or should I say copy/pasted it (little clue for you).

Please, feel free to keep further derailing a thread, you are only contributing my cause.

---

Originally by: THE L0CK

---

Originally by: Wulfnor

---

Contrary to you I do read things before posting. It might be possible to understand why you made your first post, no matter how flawed it might be, but to follow on with advice to read before posting (something you admit you deliberately did not do) appears to be something you could better explain in a thread of your own if you are really concerned about derailing rather than bumping your post count.

---

Like a true rebel without a clue you continue to not disappoint. I can make a new thread and continue to explain to you about reading before posting but what is the point, you haven't been able to understand it the first 3 times. You haven't a clue why I replied to the person that replied to me but you sure are hooked on muddying the waters yourself with this ongoing debate.

And why do people keep thinking I'm a Cat alt? That's the 5th time I've been accused of that.

---

Originally by: THE L0CK

---

Edited by: THE L0CK on 26/08/2009 22:28:21

Originally by: Wulfnor

---

And like a true clueless poster you continue to muddying the waters.

what you have said is clear: you did not read the op and posted about it but you advise everyone else to read before posting.

When you decide what you really mean, post it. I will read it before I reply :)

---

Show me where I advised everyone else. Last I recall I advised one person on a subject other than the OP. I believe this is where you are getting confused.

Also repeating me does not earn you points I'm afraid, you should try coming up with your own material.

---

Originally by: THE L0CK

---

Damn it, and I thought we were so close to getting you straighten out. But thanks for proving once again that you have no clue what I was talking about. Thank you and come again.

Protip: This whole discussion we've had, has exactly jack to do with the OP or anyone else including you. You may want to read before commenting next time.

---

Originally by: THE L0CK

---

And he repeats me yet again. This dude's like one of those annoying little kids at the mall who mimics you for the nuisance factor.
I already told you, get your own material so you don't sound nearly as half wit.

---

Originally by: THE L0CK

---

Originally by: Wulfnor

---

Originally by: THE L0CK

---

And he repeats me yet again. This dude's like one of those annoying little kids at the mall who mimics you for the nuisance factor.
I already told you, get your own material so you don't sound nearly as half wit.

---

I think perhaps it is you are running out: I never tried.

How you can be any kinda positive about something you proudly proclaim you did not read, then to go on and give people a pro tip to read before commenting on things makes me wonder how valid anything you write might be.

---

You never tried what? To think a coherent thought?

Let me type slower so you'll understand. As I said, I did not protip people, I protip'd the guy, as in singular action, who responded to me just as I protip'd you later on. It appears he got it, you on the other hand, well, you're just 'special'.
The protip has nothing to do with the OP, or other people, or even you, a third party that is arguing semantics over something he didn't even get the first time.

I understand my quote came from Whitehound, but I believe it applies to you as well. And for the love of god, don't repeat everything I said this time, show us you have the ability to formulate your own sentences.

---

Originally by: THE L0CK

---

Originally by: Wulfnor

---

You really are special:) How you can read a thing over and over and get nothing out of it, is beyond me. Doesn't really matter does it. You still post about things you say you havent read but go on to advise others not to.

You would think this simple concept would get through to you. I am sure it will eventually and I will be here to watch it happen.

---

Sigh, the fail is so strong in this one. Whelp, I'm moving on.

---

Originally by: THE L0CK

---

Originally by: Ranger 1

---

Wulfnor, I rather think that is possibly the best trolling of the troll I have ever seen, well done indeed.

Lock, as Wulfnor pointed out repeatedly, he was commenting on the absurdity of your post in general. It mattered not a wit who it was in response to. In your over the top efforts to look witty, you skillfully succeeded in making yourself look even more dim with each obtuse post.

If your original goal was to make yourself appear as a clueless twit who enjoys interjecting their uninformed opinion and (somewhat lame attempt at) humor into this thread, you have succeeded. However I suspect your goal was actually to be a condescending jerk to the OP and anyone else who thought the thread had merit. I do have to give you credit, you succeeded on that score as well.

I think its a little bit past time for you to run along and stop trying to derail this thread.

---

Well I thought you understood it but I was wrong again. No I wasn't being a condescending jerk to the OP, I was being a condescending jerk to you. But as my daddy always told me you can't argue with stupid, it'll drag you to its level and beat you with experience as you and Wulfnor have done here.
It is sad that you think Wulfnors 5 year old mimicking covered your foot in mouth statement but to each his own I guess.

---