EVE Search - Stacking Command mods?

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Stacking Command mods?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Sybilla Prior	Posted - 2009.09.01 15:14:00 - [1] If you run multiple passive defense armored warfare links, do the armor resistance bonusses stack?
Zeel Aldair	Posted - 2009.09.01 15:15:00 - [2] Nope.
Sybilla Prior	Posted - 2009.09.01 15:20:00 - [3] Edited by: Sybilla Prior on 01/09/2009 15:20:25 So the only way to make multiple warfare links usefull is if they each give different bonusses?
Zeel Aldair	Posted - 2009.09.01 15:28:00 - [4] That's right yep. So you could put on the three armoured warfare ones, and obviously they would all work together. Or if you just want more buffer, you could combine the armour one (passive defence) with the shield one (shield harmonizing). Basically you can only ever get the effects of each mod once, even if you have multiple eligible boosters with the same mods or whatever. At best you'll only get the best bonus from each one. Of course you can also put in a mindlink to get more armour HP or whatever, if you're going for full on buffer buffing. :)
Sybilla Prior	Posted - 2009.09.01 15:34:00 - [5] And they don't stack either if you have 2 command ships running the same mod, one being fleet booster, the other wing, or squad booster?
VaderDSL Invicta. Advocated Destruction	Posted - 2009.09.01 15:36:00 - [6] Originally by: Sybilla Prior And they don't stack either if you have 2 command ships running the same mod, one being fleet booster, the other wing, or squad booster? Nope, highest bonus applied, all others ignored. If both equal I assume it takes the lower commanders bonus. They are alaso stacking nerfed against items of similar type.
Sybilla Prior	Posted - 2009.09.01 15:37:00 - [7] Originally by: VaderDSL Originally by: Sybilla Prior And they don't stack either if you have 2 command ships running the same mod, one being fleet booster, the other wing, or squad booster? Nope, highest bonus applied, all others ignored. If both equal I assume it takes the lower commanders bonus. They are alaso stacking nerfed against items of similar type. Nerfed to 0 or just reduced?
SuiJuris Absinthe Brothers Consortium	Posted - 2009.09.01 15:39:00 - [8] Originally by: Sybilla Prior Originally by: VaderDSL Originally by: Sybilla Prior And they don't stack either if you have 2 command ships running the same mod, one being fleet booster, the other wing, or squad booster? Nope, highest bonus applied, all others ignored. If both equal I assume it takes the lower commanders bonus. They are alaso stacking nerfed against items of similar type. HOLY CRAP HOW MANY TIMES DO WE HAVE TO SAY IT, YOU CANNOT GET A BONUS FROM THE SAME ONE TWICE EVEN IF ITS ON A SECOND SHIP. Nerfed to 0 or just reduced? --- Ceptor Pilots HULL tank
VaderDSL Invicta. Advocated Destruction	Posted - 2009.09.01 15:42:00 - [9] Originally by: Sybilla Prior Originally by: VaderDSL Originally by: Sybilla Prior And they don't stack either if you have 2 command ships running the same mod, one being fleet booster, the other wing, or squad booster? Nope, highest bonus applied, all others ignored. If both equal I assume it takes the lower commanders bonus. They are alaso stacking nerfed against items of similar type. Nerfed to 0 or just reduced? Please correct me if I am wrong but I was under the impression that if say you are running an energized adaptive membrane on a ship and you rdamnation has the passive defence warfare link the bonuses the warfare link provide are subject to the stacking penalties, just like you would if you fitted an extra eanm, so the more energized/adaptive plates fitted the less bonus the warfare link provides. Personally I'd like to see the stacking penalties not apply, that is if they don't already. Like I say I may be wrong about this.
fivetide humidyear Gallente The Avalon Foundation The Drift.	Posted - 2009.09.01 15:46:00 - [10] the passive defence armoured warfare ganglink (and the same shield resists one)stack against any EANM's / active hardners / rigs you have fitted. they are also not effected by your compensation skills unlike eanm's. i've not tried fitting 2 to the same damnation, may try it later but the effect won't be great even if you can (which i doubt)

Guillame Herschel Gallente NME1	Posted - 2009.09.01 18:29:00 - [11] Originally by: fivetide humidyear the passive defence armoured warfare ganglink (and the same shield resists one)stack against any EANM's / active hardners / rigs you have fitted. They stack multiplicatively like any percentage bonus in EVE. But Command bonuses are not stacking nerfed with modules or rigs that provide the same bonus. You always get the full Command bonus, regardless of how many modules or rigs you also have that provide the same bonus. -- The crazy tree blooms at every moment of liberal ascendancy.
Harotak THE FINAL STAND The Final Stand.	Posted - 2009.09.01 19:46:00 - [12] Edited by: Harotak on 01/09/2009 19:46:48 Originally by: Guillame Herschel [They stack multiplicatively like any percentage bonus in EVE. But Command bonuses are not stacking nerfed with modules or rigs that provide the same bonus. You always get the full Command bonus, regardless of how many modules or rigs you also have that provide the same bonus. That is incorrect. Links stack against mods that give the same bonus. If you have 3x eanm than a passive defense link will do almost nothing for you. If you plan on flying with an armor minlink pilot running passive defense you should adjust your fit to get the most benefit from it. Normally you might be the best eHP with two EANMs and then plates, but with the link you might get more with one EANM and an additional plate.
Guillame Herschel Gallente NME1	Posted - 2009.09.01 21:18:00 - [13] Edited by: Guillame Herschel on 01/09/2009 21:18:04 Originally by: Harotak If you have 3x eanm than a passive defense link will do almost nothing for you. I don't think that's because the command bonus is stacking nerfed. It's because the base resists before EANM bonuses are applied are higher thanks to the command bonus. Are you saying that if I have 1 EANM II which gives 20% to all armor resists, and join a fleet with a booster giving 30% to all armor resists, then my single EANM II now gives me only 0.89 x 20% bonus (stacking nerfed with the command bonus)? -- The crazy tree blooms at every moment of liberal ascendancy.
VaderDSL Invicta. Advocated Destruction	Posted - 2009.09.01 21:33:00 - [14] Originally by: Guillame Herschel Edited by: Guillame Herschel on 01/09/2009 21:18:04 Originally by: Harotak If you have 3x eanm than a passive defense link will do almost nothing for you. I don't think that's because the command bonus is stacking nerfed. It's because the base resists before EANM bonuses are applied are higher thanks to the command bonus. Are you saying that if I have 1 EANM II which gives 20% to all armor resists, and join a fleet with a booster giving 30% to all armor resists, then my single EANM II now gives me only 0.89 x 20% bonus (stacking nerfed with the command bonus)? yup


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.